Happy MLK Day! Dr. Paul speaks against the Civil Rights Act of 1964

I think his point is eloquent in its entirety, and well spoken by a true constitutionalist. I am sure that there are those that will not be able to accept his words, and possibly find it easier to follow the status quo’s instruction to label Dr. Paul a racist. This is the farthest from the truth, and those that are speaking out against it should read the constitution. Ignorance is truly bliss if anyone thinks that H.Res 676 was the end of racism in America, and that is what the MSM and status quo want us all to believe as it makes it easier to separate us with that belief, and to further us away from individual liberty. It was the people of this great nation that have turned the tides of racial turmoil, not the legislation that was passed. Do not get me wrong, some of what the legislation did was good, but in and of itself it did not end racism in the least, and has yet to turn the tides of racial tensions in places like Mississippi and others. The only thing that will end racism is when a people educate themselves and come together to find that they have more likes than differences. We; as a nation, are the controllers of our own destiny. To think that H.Res 676 was the end all beat all is simply incorrect; it would be as if the anti drug laws simply caused all that were addicted to drugs, to stop using. I stand beside Dr. Paul and his words, and I am no way a racist, and as a Native American I forgive those that’s ignorance have led them to think that I am lesser of a person. In the end it will be up to the people of this nation and world to end racism, not legislation from those that use our differences against us to further their agenda.

In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.
~Mark Twain

Dr. Peter S. Ruckman
Page 2 B.B.B. January, 2004
Dr. Ruckman’s
Preaching
Schedule
Jan. 2–4
Crossroads Baptist Ch.
414 Ridge Road
Fern Park, FL
(407) 599-4033
Pastor Rylan Millett
Strictly

Personal THE END OF THE
CONSTITUTION
As America approaches
bankruptcy on an international
scale, and shortly will
become a “Vatican satellite”
of the European Economic
Community, there are still a
few immensely naive Americans
in it who think they
have “Constitutional rights”
in law courts; they often appeal
to various “amendments”
in the Bill of Rights
hoping they will find “justice”
under Supreme Court justices
and District Court
judges. Their “track record”
since the days of FDR
(1933–1945) has been a
joke. It turned from a joke
into a farce in 1964 with the
passage of the Civil Rights
Act, which did away with every
“right” in the Bill of
Rights.
Since 1964, the law-making
body of the original
American republic has
ceased to pass about 4,000
“laws” which are now being
enforced by bureaucrats and
the “Justice Department.”
The ghastly truth is that every
ersatz “law” being enforced
in America today,
where it deals with privacy,
abortions, the drug traffic,
protection of private property,
discipline of children,
school curriculums, foreign
policies, and operation of
small businesses, is a nonexistent
“law” that was never
passed by any Congress. All
of these fabricated laws turn
out to be nothing but rulings
on “interpretations” of the
Constitution, given by practical
atheists who believed
that Darwin’s evolution
should be applied to society,
civilization, religions, and
education.
Congress never declared
war on Haiti or Kuwait.
Congress never declared
war on Vietnam or Korea.
Congress never voted to
take England’s side against
Germany before 1941 and
supply Russia with weapons
(before 1941).
Congress never voted for
the “Greer” (an Amercan destroyer)
to guide British
bombers to sink a German
submarine in German waters
which had never fired a shot
at anyone, including the destroyer.
Congress never voted for
“Affirmative Action,” no matter
who thought it should be
practised.
Congress never passed
any law saying anyone could
sue anyone for being
“harrassed” or “offended” by
something somebody said.
Congress never passed
any law that said you had
no right to object to anyone’s
“sexual preference” or “color”
or “religious belief.”
Not a dozen activities of
any government bureau, now
operating on the taxpayer’s
money, are legal or lawful;
they are “policies” and “regulations”
or “executive orders,”
etc. Back in 1933 and
1939, FDR declared three
times that if elected he would
make it absolutely sure that
not one American “boy”
would ever leave the shores
of America to fight in any foreign
war. “I give you mothers
and fathers one more
assurance. I have said this
before and will say it again
and again and again: your
boys are not going to be sent
into any foreign wars” (Boston,
Oct. 30, 1940).
Later it was discovered
that he planned to draft and
send 5,000,000 armed
American “boys” overseas to
invade Europe.
On December 4, 1941, the
Chicago Tribune published
FDR’s plans for a full scale
war against Germany. The
war plans were authentic
and drawn up by order of
FDR. Nobody discussed
them or voted on them. Sen.
Burton Wheeler, southern
senator, leaked news from
the War Department and let
them know what five men
would do for one man outside
of the law.
America was a republic.
It has not been a republic
since 1865. It was a “democracy”
until 1964 (Civil Rights
Act), and now it is an apartheid
oligarchy run by nine
“old men” (occasionally a female!)
and the news media.
FDR’s buddies (Sec. of
the Interior and Sec. of War
[Stinson]) wanted charges of
TREASON to be brought
against the Chicago Tribune.
Before they could prosecute,
FDR had Pearl bombed.
The most pitiful sound in
this decade is the sound of
Christians singing either
“God Bless America” (Kate
Smith) or “The Battle HYMN
of the Republic.” No such
things exist—in or out of the
Scriptures.
Every “freedom document”
of the “Republic”
(1776–1790) was put together
by white, straight,
male Protestants, as well as
the Gettysburg Address. No
Afro-American, no female,
and no sex pervert ever
poked his nose out of the
bushes. Historical facts such
as that are considered to be
“hate literature” and “hate
speech” by atheistic, humanitarian
evolutionists:
monkey men—“do-gooders”;
i.e., ANTI-AMERICANS.
The Bill of Rights was intended
to be an official restriction
against the kind of
government that came in
with FDR in 1933. What the
judges did was use the Bill
of Rights to restrict the states
from governing themselves;
they were to be governed by
apartheid—centralized bureaucrats
in “MARYland”
(Washington, D.C.).
When the Supreme Court
judges tried to apply the First
Amendment to the individual
states (1865–1880), they
were voted down by Congress
six times. The judges
wanted to limit each state’s
authority so that the federal
government would handle
violations of the First Amendment
in Washington, not in
the United STATES (plural).
Every decision by the Supreme
Court made after FDR
was a violation of the Constitution,
for all of them came
by using the infamous Four-
(Continued on page 4)Page 4 B.B.B. January, 2004
teenth Amendment to control
individuals in the states.
The lawmakers (Congress)
said six times this idea was
unconstitional before the
“justices” and the news media
enforced it.
Thomas Jefferson took
Congress’ position against
the Supreme Court and ALL
district court judges long before
the Civil War. He said
(1798): “There shall be no
power over the freedom of
religion delegated to the
United STATES [plural] by
the Constitution”; [1805] “In
matters of religion I have
considered the free exercise
thereof is guaranteed by the
Constitution INDEPENDENT
of the powers [plural] of the
general Government”; (1808)
“I consider the government
of the United States is interdicted
and prohibited by the
Constitution from intermeddling
with religious institutions
[local churches, church
schools, daily vacation Bible
schools, servicemen’s centers,
rescue missions, etc.],
their doctrines, their disciplines,
and their EXERCISES.”
This meant that no government
could tell BJU,
PCC, or BBC what they
should PRACTICE (“exercise”)
if they had doctrinal
convictions about segregation,
the UN, abortion, grading
systems, equality of
sexes, sexual lifestyle, morals,
discipline of children,
marriage or divorce, the
Babylonian Whore (Rev. 17)
and Vatican imperialism, or
Islamic Imperialism.
At least not in a “REPUBLIC”
or a “DEMOCRACY.”
As an authority on the
Constitution, Thomas Jefferson
was so far superior to
any Supreme Court judge
who ever lived in the nineteenth
or twentieth century.
They are not worthy of comparison.
Another higher authority
than any coalition of evolutionary
atheists would be
James Madison. Here is
what he said: “Before any
man can be accepted as a
member of civil society he
must be considered as a
subject of the GOVERNOR
of the universe.” (There went
Einstein, Marx, Spencer,
Huxley, Leakey, Hawking,
the National Geographic
magazine, and the ACLU out
the window). “It is the duty
of all to practise Christian
forebearance, showing love
and charity for each other.
The success of our government
is based on KEEPING
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.”
When the Supreme Court
tried to get rid of the “Ten”
they found out the correct
“ruling” was as follows:
“Nothing could be more offensive
to the virtuous part
of the community or more injurious
to the tenderal morals
of the young than to declare
profanity lawful.” So?
So in 1971 we find inscribed
on a T-shirt, “F— the draft!”
The wearer was informed
that the state laws (California)
which forbid him to display
this were “unconstitutional”
by the same Supreme
Court that had previously
said it was going to do more
INJURY to “youth” than anything
anyone could do.
“F—” is not an “offence”
to anyone according to nine
evolutionary atheists. The
California statute “infringed”
on the scumbucket’s civil
rights to free speech as “defined
in the Fourteenth
Amendment to the Constitu-
The End of the Constitution
(Continued on page 11)
(Continued from page 2)

"Balkanization"

nice word!

The irony is that people may think RP is racist when he is the most colorblind congressman probably in the history of the US.

Flame
Meikldielk (sp? I just call him Molachzdick)
ladalang
captcorona

All of the above people have started regularly posting on this forum since the war on Gaza and all have overwhelmingly taken divisive stances. Is it coincidence that Israel is now paying an army of bloggers to instill strife in Anti war forums with the arrival of these people?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/israel-recruits-army-of-bloggers...

I don't think so.

Actually it is for Effort, for which I thank you. As a DP’r libertarian I appreciate your judicious patience.

What substance exists between the lines ( well… I guess it’s actually the ‘lines’ themselves now that the ‘between’ has been redacted ) is worth salvaging. ;-)

then will someone please explain WHY the election of Obama is such a big deal ?

Why would any of us care what color his skin is ?

The emphasis on him being an "African American" would be a non-issue.

My point - there is no racial equality in the hearts and minds of many Americans when this man (who, BTW is neither Black nor American) receives the undue honor and fanatic following he has due to his skin color. He has absolutely NO qualifications to be POTUS.

Again, BRAVO to Ron Paul - he gets it right every time and continues to instruct me and open my eyes.