Dennis Kucinich Rails Against the FEDERAL RESERVE Banking
Submitted by Alli on Mon, 01/26/2009 - 18:50Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) takes to the House floor during one minute speeches to rail against bank bailouts, the creation of money out of thin air, ergo fractional reserve banking, and returning monetary policy to the Treasury Department.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x85sun_rep-dennis-kucinich-...
»
I wish Kucinich would just
I wish Kucinich would just SHUT UP and sit down! He lends no credibility to the idea of ending the FED.
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/user/BeaReady/
http://www.ohiofreedom.com/subd/
Trust in God, but tie your camel tight.
"Socialism needs two legs on which to stand; a right and a left. While appearing to be in complete opposition to one another,they both march in the same direction." - Paul Proctor
He was on Glenn Becks show
He was on Glenn Becks show an hour ago saying that "The Federal Reserve is as federal as Federal Express"... Glenn Beck was so happy to hear a Democrat against the Fed...
Our anti-fed message has reached both ends of the political spectrum... It's only a matter of time until it reaches a "tipping point" and permeate throughout the masses.
-------------
Here's a link that explains why Ron Paul's message is better for Israelis, Palestinians, Americans, and the entire world. www.AmericansForIsrael.com
That was embarrassing
I saw it...Him preaching his monetary socialism. Why didn't he talk about free-market money?
Dennis is a monetary socialist
Pathetic. He thinks everything "would be all better" if the monopoly license to print money pout of thin air would simply be given to the Treasury.
What did he mean by...
"spending money into circulation"?
Undo what Wilson did
I believe that means...
the Treasury would print the money out of thin air and it would then be used to pay for the bills that Congress passes.
It's my understanding that under the current system, the Federal Reserve buys bonds from the Treasury. So, the money still goes to the Treasury (as in Dennis' proposal)...but I guess the difference is that the Treasury owes interest payments (on the bonds) to the FED,