92 Grandparents refused by court ot raise grandkids--Kids given up to adoption to Gay couple!

What's the purpose of pointing out that the couples gay in your title? Does that make things worse or something?

It is hard to judge or have an opinion on the matter. Myself if a couple is too old to take care of the children and the social worker brings a case that the grandparents even if loving and caring cannot take care of themselves or the children. The court must rule in the best interests of the children.. The assumption is that while parents and relatives have a special relationship and responsibility to the children if they are not able to take care of the kids then it is appropriate and indeed highly ethical to take the children and give them a loving home that will help them become better young people and then adults (i.e. citizens).

The day when Parents owned their children is over . Children are people and the community as a whole judges the standards of which is "in the best interests" in the 16th century people owned children.. worked them etc.. Children were owned and not protected unless orphaned. We are way better off with the view that Children do not belong to their parents. They have (gay or straight, even bi) a special responsibility to Children to be protected for the health of the world and the government in question.

I am sure I will be flamed but the need to feel like you own your kids and have exclusive rights to them is long pass e and an unethical concept. You do not own children.. We must love and care for them even if others who by blood should but cannot take care of them due to finances etc..

(family at that), this is just a further nail in the coffin of the moral values of family life.
The NWO has worked actively on destroying families since the sixties. Morals and family values are not wanted, close relations are not wanted,, make it wild, and sex, and confuse people about what is really important, all in preparation of serving only one Master, The Illuminati!!.

Of course there is no doubt in my mind that grand parents, or siblings of a so-called unfit parent should be considered first. Blood is thicker than water!!

It is also an indication from which age group onwards we have to look to be the target of 'useless eaters'.

But making it into a perhaps gay campaign is just another ploy to distract of what is really going on.
Nothing is what it seems..

careful semper.. Rhino will call you a bigot!

"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny."
-Thomas Jefferson

I am more concerned about the return of my money than the return on my money. --Mark Twain

the family is to be broken down, as it was in China; women, men, boys, girls all in separate dorms with no family contact. The purpose? Indoctrination into loyalty to the state above all else, with no family ties. Might see more of this and worse.

gay couples adopting; what troubles me about this is the reasoning concerning the grandparents' ages and health--the gay couple could die tomorrow in a car accident or some other way...or develop health issues...or anybody else who adopted these children...
Also, imo, family raising family should be a priority...government needs to get their noses out of it...

I noticed this story on the sidebar when reading about the adoption case.

School bosses under fire after inviting a pole-dancer to perform for 14-year-old pupils

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1131522/Teachers-sla...