0 votes

Skyscraper on fire in Beijing! Will it collapse?

Very sad if there is any loss of life no doubt. However, my curiousity is what will be left after the fire.



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

911 SCIENCE > MY HYPOTHESIS

WHAT WILL HAPPEN????????????????

I HYPOTHESIZE THAT THE BUILDING WILL NOT FALL DOWN

WHO AGREES??????????????????????

IF THE BUILDING DOESNT COME DOWN AFTER 1 HOUR OF

FLAMES JUST LIKE THE TWIN TOWERS DID

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN????????????

IT MEANS > SOMETHING OTHER THAN MERELY THE FLAMES

BROUGHT DOWN THE TOWERS

THINK ! AZZHOLES !

THINKING IS SUBVERSIVE !

PEACE OUT

BBC just announced that the

BBC just announced that the tower collapsed.

“The more corrupt the state, the more laws.”

nothing like this on BBC

........

"(Better) to be confused in the search for truth than fully confident and sound asleep in a dream of lies." ~ Michael Nystrom
http://www.votenader.org/blog/2008/09/10/statement-to-ron-pa...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57925480@N00/2660779139

LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
http://www.dailypaul.com/203008/south-carolina-battle-of-cow...
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15

It may have been a joke

related to the BBC announcing the collapse of WTC 7, 20 minutes before it collapsed.
Just a guess.

★★★★★★
The 2nd amendment.
The ORIGINAL Homeland Security

link?

look at those pictures...

look at those pictures... that building is on fire more then the towers ever were.. same with building 7 that wasn't on fire.. interesting! next few days are going to be awefully funny around here.. when the lights go on the cockroaches scramble!

"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny."
-Thomas Jefferson

I am more concerned about the return of my money than the return on my money. --Mark Twain

Did this tower....

...have one of it's corners destroyed, and structural supports by falling debris like WT7? Or maybe it was struck by an airliner full of fuel ?? Oh wait..I forget Hoffa and Elvis planted explosives in WT1 and 2..Right..I got it now..LOL..The Airliners were CGI or Holigrams..and all the eye witnesses were Government plants..Right (wink)... Comedy pure comedy..Thanks I needed the laughs! Yet, 19 dead sucide bombers..that's impossible...PUHLEESE

What destroyed corner?

There's no physical evidence of the crime scene, so do you at least have photographs of the "destroyed corner" of WTC-7? I'd like to look at them.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

What makes you think a chipped corner..

..would cause spontaneous collapse of a giant steel-framed building 610 feet tall?

It's not a medieval castle built of stone blocks and held up by rotting timber.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

fireant's picture

All the more reason...

to question the manner in which it fell. Had that damage contributed, the fall would have been lopsided, rather than the whole thing coming down as it did.

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams

Undo what Wilson did

yes

A damaged corner would have introduced rotation vs. vertical symmetrical collapse.

IQ=SHOE SIZE

10-10 1/2

symmetrical and vertical collapse

Did this tower have one of it's corners destroyed?

If the corner of WTC 7 was destroyed, then why did WTC 7 collapse symmetrically and vertically straight down into its own footprint?

It's called engineering...

... If you plan to build a skyscraper in a highly populated area, it makes sense to design it so that "If" something happens, the damage is contained as much as possible..IE into it's own foot print. Here, I'll start you off in the right direction...

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
To summarize all of these points, a 500,000 t structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction other than nearly straight down.

You fail to answer Tuma's

You fail to answer Tuma's above question I see. Of course you did. The building was built to withstand multiple airline impacts. A plane laden with jet fuel doesn't turn a skyscraper into dust! A steel melting raging inferno doesn't have a woman waving in it. Get real.

I'll try again w/ fewer words....

....inertia

Keep trying

It turned to dust in midair. That entire upper portion should have stayed together in one piece until it hit the ground. Inertia does not turn buildings into dust in midair you fool.

"There can be only one permanent revolution - a moral one: The regeneration of the inner man."
—Tolstoy

"The body is but a vessel for the soul,
A puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny.
And lo, the body is not eternal,
For it must feed on the flesh of others,
Lest it return to the dust whence it came.
Therefore the soul deceives and despises."

If they design them to fall into their own footprint...

...does that mean that there will no longer have to be demolitions experts?

Take note that your link is theory

As it even mentions in the title, it is full of speculation.

Using this paper to speak in authoritative terms is folly.
_________________________________

My liberty-minded home base of thought:

www.ponderthis.net

_________________________________

Freedom - Peace - Prosperity

Tiiiiiiiiiiimmber!

Ever notice that the taller things are the longer it takes to topple? You can experiment with a toothpick and broomstick - then extrapolate to 1000' tall. Collapsing and toppling were competing processes at WTC. Collapse was (much) faster. I don't expect people ignorant of math and physics to understand.

So the building pancaked?

How did the foundation of the building fail so rapidly and absolutely? Did the steel core fail at every key juncture simultaneously?

_________________________________

My liberty-minded home base of thought:

www.ponderthis.net

_________________________________

Freedom - Peace - Prosperity

Ya GATA remember that when they build something as tall

as current technology allows, you don't have a lot of safety factor (having pushed the envelope, so to speak). Don't get me wrong - the official 9/11 line stinks. We can argue endlessly about whether the fire was hot enough, how the control wires and detonators necessary for controlled demolition survived the fire, why nobody noticed Hoffa and Elvis, etc. Not to mention the fact that the physical evidence is gone. All this distracts from a potentially much more fruitful inquiry (which is why I am somewhat suspicious of 'truthers') into why fighters did not intercept, why intelligence was ignored. Need a new investigation for sure.

"...why fighters did not intercept..."

That is one thing that made me raise an eyebrow about the whole thing in the first place.

I can agree there

_________________________________

My liberty-minded home base of thought:

www.ponderthis.net

_________________________________

Freedom - Peace - Prosperity

It's called trolling...

That link is about WTC 1 and 2, not building 7.

In addition, that link does not talk about buildings being intentionally designed to collapse into their own footprint.

exactly

thats the clincher for me.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
woo hoo!

What's your point

19 hijackers sure as hell didn't pull off 9/11 if that's what you're claiming. Especially since 7 of them turned up alive.

Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/

Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Hoffa and Elvis, lol

and the Mission Impossible Team