Civilizations Evolution
Ok, hear me out I’ve been doing a bit of research. It started when I read a book by Michio Kaku a theoretical physicist specializing in string field theory, and a futurist. It’s the futurist part of his book that grabbed my attention to our political situation. This is a theory of civilizations evolution. The Kardashev scale is a method of measuring a civilization's level of technological advancement. The scale is only theoretical and in terms of an actual civilization highly speculative; however, it puts energy consumption of an entire civilization in a cosmic perspective. It was first proposed in 1964 by the Soviet Russian astronomer Nikolai Kardashev. The scale has three designated categories called Type I, II, and III. These are based on the amount of usable energy a civilization has at its disposal, and the degree of space colonization. In general terms, a Type I civilization has achieved mastery of the resources of its home planet, Type II of its solar system, and Type III of its galaxy. We are at 0.7 on the scale. According to Michio Kaku the transition from 0 to a type 1 civilization is the most difficult and dangerous. He also states that every civilization have to go through these transitions, and that it’s unavoidable.
What if this is similar to what the proponents of a one world government are using this to base there model off of.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Kaku (this is just info on Michio Kaku)
I’m just looking for your thoughts on all this. I believe this is there focus, as ours is in national sovereignty, and state rights.
There was some excellent discussion on this post below
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/79318
"Obamney care," Nuff said.
Thx
it was good.
I didn't see much on the site you linked to
but from what I have seen in history on civilizations is that there have been many great and powerful civilizations, and they have all died. But it seems that corruption from within the government and the people happened first and appears to have caused the death of their civilizations.Some had manipulation of the money, but some didn't. Whatever your religious orientation, or lack of, this is obvious from seeing the history of these civilizations. The people in power seem to be the worst. hmm, doesn't look too good for us, does it?
Anyone
Have feedback on this?
A few ideas:
1. Respect the dignity of ALL sentient being.
2. Decentralize.
3. Comprehend and appreciate (again it seems to be about 'respect') the immense energy all around us, at our fingertips almost, and likely only available to a more 'evolved' human maturity.
The trick does seem to be (this dangerous step from "0.7" to even just step 1)... is whether or not "power" is going to be concentrated in the hands of a small number of low-thinking people... or shared (the knowledge), equitable, among all? (btw, this IS a cosmos of plenty. "Scarcity", even in terms of energy, is a myth promulgated and sustained by those same low-thinking types unable to comprehend a world of genuine freedom and liberty.
I've been thinking for some time, and saying, that it seems "They" may be stuck in a rut, unable to feel empathy, sociopaths who tripped over the 'secrets' of domination long ago... and just can't see themselves getting out of the way now that they've held the reins of Control for so many millennia.
What you're discussing about Science, for example, runs VERY deep. Orthodoxy, compartmentalized orthodoxy for that matter, is a hurdle almost unimaginably high, with institutional torpidity containing mind-bending inertia.
Try this out... one of my favorite web sites... detested by wikipedia and NASA alike: thunderbolts.info
Cool website
thanks.
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/