0 votes

I had a judge tell me the constitution is legal jibberish today!

i had a judge say the constitution was legal jibberish today when i was in court how is this legal for a judge to swear a oath to uphold it and say its legal jibberish?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I would like to see the

I would like to see the court transcript of your statements before I comment on this. It could be you were trying to defend your case with the constitution clause that did not apply. I don't like to make conclusions without the facts. Can you get a copy of your transcript and scan it in so we can make a proper decision and suggestion?

www.retakecongress.com

www.rtrradio.com

Ask the judge

If he is an attorney and is familiar with the effect bar grievances have on attorney standing (job related) and bonding issues. Ask him if he is familiar with liens placed on courts, and the effect his oath (or the lack thereof) has on the judgements he has made. Ask him if through that oath he has established a third party contract with the people that come before him in his courtroom. Ask him if he is familiar with criminal complaints as per the Constitution and the code irregardless of the state where he practicies. Ask him if he is familiar with grand jury procedure and your ability to approach (without reproach) them concerning criminal complaints for public servants. Finally ask him if he has an updated resume because he's going to need it. Your judge is in for an awakening.

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

I had jury duty yesterday. I

I had jury duty yesterday. I was actually excited to see the court system in action. Even though it was a real pain to go, I was thinking I sure would appreciate a fair jury if it were I who was being charged with something.

so I show up and the Judge reads some instructions and I have to fill out this form. It asks me if I would believe a cop's testimony over a defendant's. I of course said no. I can't believe anyone would check "yes" on that without even hearing the facts of a case. Anyone who checked "yes" I'm sure would be dismissed as a juror as they should be.

Long story short, after sitting there from 8:30AM to Noon, we did nothing. They sent us to lunch for and hour and a half. I came back and they said there was no trial after all today. They paid us each $13.00 which pretty much covered the cost of our parking. There were at least 50 people there times $13.00. That's $650.00 tax payer dollars for nothing. Also, all those people lost a day of work. What waste. What a disappointment. The guy at the parking garage says it happens all the time.

tell him he's not a real man

tell him he's not a real man and you'll meet him out in the parking lot.

then kick his ass to the curb and teach the lil bastard some respect!

without knowing specifics

without knowing specifics FreeManOnLand is correct, a judge, not under oath and on record can say anything...also, depending on what you are defending yourself from, citing the constitution and declaring that it applies to you will not work...
think about this:
If you get a job for Chevrolet, and in your contract, that you sign, it says "if you wear shorts to work you will be fired", then you wear shorts and indeed get fired, you cant then sue Chevrolet for violation of your rights, and state, "it's unconstitutional to not allow me to wear shorts" this was an agreement you entered into.

it's the same if you have a drivers license in a state. The license is an agreement, a contract, that you sign, that says you will follow the statutes and acts of the state. Now, even though NONE of the driving "laws" are actually laws, but rather statutes that you have agreed to follow, you will have a hard time fighting tickets. On the other hand, if you are licensed in another state (which I recommend), then you have made no agreement to follow this states statutes and acts, and can therefore easily fight the ticket because they dont have jurisdiction over you. Same as if you started working part time at KFC (while employed for Chevrolet from the scenario above) and wore shorts to KFC, and they fire you because of your contract with Chevrolet...I know these are silly analagies, but they are just used to explain how it works.

Ive heard my whole life of people trying to fight tickets, be free, avoid taxes, etc. based on principle of constitutionality, and failing miserably. This is because you HAVE signed a contract with the corporation "THE UNITED STATES" and you have been assigned an employee id number which is your social security number. The only way, is to break that connection by giving up your social security number. If you want the SS benefits, than keep the number, but you will NEVER be free, as long as you are an employee of the UNITED STATES.
CALL the social security association and ask them if the ss is mandatory. they will try to imply it is, but it is not. If they say it is, Ask them this "So do I HAVE to get my children a social security number?" they will say "no, but you should." Then remind them that they just said it was mandatory!!
This is because our government is tricking us, NOT breaking the law, only tricking us.
the definition of these words "citizen" "resident" "domicile" are NOT what you think

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/Citizenship/WhyAN...

Of course.

Makes perfect sense. Ask any educated idiot.They’re the enlightened ones.

—Cliff, Sioux City, Iowa
February’s song: “Carly’s Song” by David Sanborn
Throw-away tools of war

On Facebook:
Personal ProfilePolitical GroupPolitical Page

well you know....

Those who betray or subvert the Constitution are guilty of sedition and/or treason, are domestic enemies and should and will be punished accordingly.

They have just gotten away with it for far too long.

well what do you think i should do

the alaska court system is totally a racketeering operation, they say you don't have rights in there superior court up here.

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

no lawyer

and am from the country so I haven't tangled with the law or been in a courtroom in quite sometime. So i wouldn't know what advice to give you.

But...

I meant that one day that judge will have to stand before us and be judged himself as to how he treated the Constitution.

bump

bump

1) What was the context of

1) What was the context of the utterance? (In other words, what did you do or say beforehand)

2) Judges are only human, and I've personally seen odd behavior exhibited when I went to small claims once.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

the context was superior court case quoted

and then i connected it with the sixth amendment and he said that i was quoting legal jibberish and thats why could not represent myself because i kept quoting legal jibberish.

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

Question.

Did you have the judge state that he is under oath on record?

The judge, as police officers, acts upon two dual capacities. One, off record, as an officer of the court; and two, under oath, as a true judge. Most proceedings usually occur with the judge acting as an officer of the court without a jury or even a present 3rd party.

Think about the people's court. One person is suing another and the judge is acting as the "judge" or neutral third party. When you go to court for a traffic ticket who is the party charging you? the prosecutor, your defending yourself, and who is the judge? the 3rd party. However, unless you put the judge under oath he is an officer of the court and not on your side.

Things change when you put him under oath on record.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

i like the idea but everytime i do

i looked at his fraudulent oath he took its not even real and besides that the judges in alaska don't even have a appointment, or a commission to be a judge and they don't even have a bond numbers they basically are all attorneys with bar #'s acting as the judges/prosecutor.

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

im extremely involved in

im extremely involved in judicial reform. What the judge said doesnt surprise me. They are not accoutable with out access to the grand jury. Im researching complaints to the sheriff, or the senate legislature chair, but so far there has been no acountablity.
Im also wondering, since we are corperations in court and staues apply to corperations, maybe the judge is correct, the constitution does not apply to you as a corperation, maybe you agreed to "pro se" there for your subject to priviliages, that most likely the court writes those rules.....I dont have rock solid answers, but I think im on to something here.

Look up Rod Class on google video.

actually i told the judge im not a slave

i can't represent myself because i am myself. i also told them im not a artificial person and they have to prove they have venue and jurisdiction besides im not in commerce im a private inhabitant on the land, consumer, lender, cestui que
unless they got the jurisdiction in writing from God im not presuming anything.

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

Here's why he said that...

About British courts, but the logic still applies. 1st of 5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0IM7Hobd_k

upholding a constitution

will not support their lavish lifestyle. They're meant to be crooked unless your talking about our judge... Andrew Napolitano

When you read or hear the word: "judge", try substituting

the phrase: "lawyer wearing a $25 black robe". Lawyers don't give bad advice......they charge for it. :)
_________________________________________
"An economy built on fiat money is a society on its way to ashes."

_________________________________________
"An economy built on fiat money is a society on its way to ashes."

Someone posted below the words...

team law. I looked it up and what a revelation. I learned things there today that I never knew about govt. fed and more. And I'm kicking 60. I'd recommend the read to anyone.

What Judge

Please identify the judge. He needs our help in identifying the truth.

Naton

patrick mckay

anchorage alaska

Wisdom is better than weapons of War.....

If the Constitution is jibberish to

this judge then the Federal Reserve Bank is gone, the Federal Income Tax is gone, play by his rules and then file one hefty lawsuit on the county for this judge not abiding by his sworn oath, isn't that still perjury ?

Oh that's right these are the jibberish parts of the Constitution I forgot !

"Ask not what your country can do
for you, Ask what you can do for
your country."
John F. Kennedy 1961

"Freedom is a right that can never be won in war,only by each individual "

INFURIATING

_________________________________

My liberty-minded home base of thought:

www.ponderthis.net

_________________________________

Freedom - Peace - Prosperity

the constitution is gibberish

Are you willing to stand up and enforce the articles of the Constitution on the government? Are you willing to arm yourself and promise them that they'll be met with retaliatory force should they violate your rights that are supposed to be protected by the Constitution?

The government has no problem pointing a gun at you to get what you want. Why shouldn't the judge, a government employee of some 'authority', simply tell you the truth? What will you do about it?

The Constitution is gibberish because so few people are willing to enforce it on the government.

Tell that black robed

Tell that black robed Satinist that what he says is jbberish.

"You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning." --Andrew Jackson,
1828

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams

That's not new

I had a Florida Circuit Court Judge tell me in a 3 hour interview, "Sometimes we have to set the Constitution aside." Tried to vote him out later, but people didn't come through.

Detective Krum Investigates:
http://victory1project.wordpress.com/
http://v1-p.com/

Detective Krum Investigates:
http://victory1project.wordpress.com/

Might want to get some

Might want to get some neighbors together and vote this guy out of office. He is there to uphold this country and that includes the Constitution.

Wow,

can you ask for a different judge, maybe one who went to law school.

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.

give his name and state

get the transcript.post it everywhere. get him outta there