On the Impossibility of Limited Government

0 votes

The fiery anarcho-capitalist Hans Hoppe, from his book Democracy—The God That Failed:

The American Constitution must be recognized for what it is—an error. As the Declaration of Independence noted, government is supposed to protect life, property, and the pursuit of happiness. Yet in granting the government the power to tax and legislate without consent, the Constitution cannot possibly assure this goal but is instead the very instrument for invading and destroying the rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. It is absurd to believe that an agency which may tax without consent can be a property protector. Likewise, it is absurd to believe that an agency with legislative powers can preserve law and order. Rather, it must be recognized that the Constitution is itself unconstitutional, i.e., incompatible with the very doctrine of natural human rights that inspired the American Revolution. Indeed, no one in his right mind would agree to a contract that allowed one's alleged protector to determine unilaterally—without one's consent—and irrevocably—without the possibility of exit—how much to charge for protection; and no one in his right mind would agree to an irrevocable contract which granted one's alleged protector the right to ultimate decisionmaking regarding one's own person and property, i.e., of unilateral lawmaking.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well, the modern Constitution is a sham, anyway.

It was amended into a mockery of itself.

No American citizen has lived under the Founder's Constitution since 1868. The Fourteenth Amendment grievously wounded the true Constitution of the United States, and the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments killed it off and threw it in a hole in the ground.

Then the Patriot Act urinated on its grave.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

Hoppe tears the original constitut'n to shreds

He's not referring to what it's become, he's attacking the constitution as an error by the american revolutionaries. Read the post again: he exposes the original constitution as a ridiculous document—who would willingly agree to a protection contract that you can't leave, and where the alleged protector unilaterally determines the price of his protection, and who reserves the right to change the terms of the contract?!?

As you stated below, founders saying the same thing back then.

"Regardless of which political party we belong to, we need an ideological spine to the movement. People need to know what we stand for. Beginning with us." - Tuma

So, it's something as a guideline . . .
I believe the advent of the satellite and internet will give rise to a supra consciousness. An enemy called ignorance is very evasive.

And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”

Thanks. I think it would be a good thing to say--

--"I believe in the ORIGINAL Constitution."

The original intent of the Founders.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

The title of the book says God failed. Corruption needs fixing.

*

And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”

A bit theologically sensitive?

Lol.

---
"It’s common among conservatives to call for a return to the Constitution. But why stop there? Let’s return to the Articles of Confederation, the original founding document." - Lew Rockwell

Bump for discussion.

to tired today to comment. Thanks for sharing.

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.

Wow, that is fiery!

Though I disagree with him that limited government is impossible...I just think that it is highly unlikely (ie. that it will stay limited) because of the incentive structure that an agency of coercive force sets in place.

---
"It’s common among conservatives to call for a return to the Constitution. But why stop there? Let’s return to the Articles of Confederation, the original founding document." - Lew Rockwell