Submitted by jedipauly on Mon, 03/02/2009 - 16:46.
Who gives a damn what either party says they stand for. I am 47 years old and both parties are socialist. Both parties talk, talk, talk, and speak to the populist rhetoric, then when they get in office it is socialism, socialism, and more socialism, with some fascism and communism thrown in. I do not believe any politician who says he is for the Constitution or for Personal Liberties. I have never seen that. All my life I have seen more and more of my freedoms and liberties taken away. Never are freedoms secured by government. Only Ron Paul talks abut abolishing the FED and IRS and returning to a gold and silver standard. I do not even know if he would even follow through if he was elected president. We need to abolish the current form of corporate U.S. government and start over from scratch with the Original Jurisdiction Constitution pre Civil War era.
I'm lovin' the humor from RP at 6:00 in the video.
rofl @ "What are you doing? did you get permission to do that?" hahahah
—
The slogan press on has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race. No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave.
I would only recommend two things for her next video:
Less volume on her microphone. She has a clear distinct voice already, and doesn't need a lot of amplification. It sounds a little like she is yelling in these interviews.
More cleavage. I remain a guy who is untroubled by pretty girls with great big -- uh, brains.
The Freedom Formula: Au + Ag + Cu + Pb
—
LXXI BC: Ego sum Spartacus // MDCCCLVII: I am Dred Scott // MCMVL: Ich bin Anne Frank // MMX: Je suis Assange // MMXI: Ik ben von NotHaus
Submitted by The Granger on Mon, 03/02/2009 - 09:36.
When Rachel was hired by the campaign, I had hoped that we were going to see allot more YouTubes with Rachel.. but it was like watching John Galt sell his engine to a corporation that took the engine off the market.
It's great to see Rachel, and I think it was smart to have C4L employ Rachel as the moderator, but I'm not a TV person or a tech, or a wanna be Rachel, I want to say what I'm about to say because seeing this video gives me the idea that
I think Rachel has talent that has been and is being wasted. Rachels's first YouTubes were POWERFUL and while this video is informative, I get a feeling that what we need to do is set Rachel up and let her be Rachel, because when she interviews the female CPAC attendee (It would have been nice to have a reference), Rachel absolutely transmitted to me the atmosphere of CPAC, better than MSM, and when she talks to Napoliano... it's like seeing a flame next to a toad. I'm sorry, for Judge makes some good points, buts hes not real... Rachel has a way of comming across the screne as REAL, and some folks look plastic.
Take Ron Paul... see how when Rachel comes up to him he brightens and jokes and he's very real. You can feel the compassion and warmth.
I really think Rachel needs to have her own show like Alex Jones or Glen Beck, etc.
—
WE ARE GOING TO WIN! ___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
Submitted by atrickpay on Mon, 03/02/2009 - 13:27.
I think Rachel has talent that has been and is being wasted. Rachels's first YouTubes were POWERFUL...
She had that video 'Confessions of a Ron Paul junkie' right?
--- “The very word government means some men governing--ruling over others. But to the degree that men are ruled by other men, they exist in slavery. - The Market for Liberty - Linda + Morris Tannehill
Submitted by The Granger on Mon, 03/02/2009 - 15:33.
She should have a YouTube or TV?Cable/ show, :Confessions of a Republican Junkie",.. and if the GOP was smart, they would hire her for their PR. She's refreshing and far more real than Sarah Palin, who I like.
—
WE ARE GOING TO WIN! ___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
Straw poll
Mitt Romney won the who should have been the candidate straw poll at CPAC so what have we accomplished?
WTF is a "Conservative?"
WTF is a "Conservative?"
Please, let's drop this word. It reminds me of Reagan and Reagen was a puppet, moron, and a fraud!
Why can't these people say Constitutionalist, Libertarian or even AMERICAN?!?!
Or better yet, leave the titles at home! Titles are exactly what got us into this mess in the first place....
Democrats or Republicans?
Who gives a damn what either party says they stand for. I am 47 years old and both parties are socialist. Both parties talk, talk, talk, and speak to the populist rhetoric, then when they get in office it is socialism, socialism, and more socialism, with some fascism and communism thrown in. I do not believe any politician who says he is for the Constitution or for Personal Liberties. I have never seen that. All my life I have seen more and more of my freedoms and liberties taken away. Never are freedoms secured by government. Only Ron Paul talks abut abolishing the FED and IRS and returning to a gold and silver standard. I do not even know if he would even follow through if he was elected president. We need to abolish the current form of corporate U.S. government and start over from scratch with the Original Jurisdiction Constitution pre Civil War era.
Awesome video!
Thanks Rachel!
I'm lovin' the humor from RP at 6:00 in the video.
rofl @ "What are you doing? did you get permission to do that?" hahahah
The slogan press on has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race. No person was ever honored for what he received. Honor has been the reward for what he gave.
- Calvin Coolidge
Thank you Rachel.
For sharing your distrust of the party, pointing out its complete lack of credibility, and demanding an apology.
Napolitano was looking good up there too.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
LOVE HER
Rachel Rocks.. we need more women in the Liberty Movement!
-----
A great empire, like a great cake, is most easily diminished at the edges. - Ben Franklin
-----
A great empire, like a great cake, is most easily diminished at the edges. - Ben Franklin
Wicked Good Fun
I would only recommend two things for her next video:
Less volume on her microphone. She has a clear distinct voice already, and doesn't need a lot of amplification. It sounds a little like she is yelling in these interviews.
More cleavage. I remain a guy who is untroubled by pretty girls with great big -- uh, brains.
The Freedom Formula: Au + Ag + Cu + Pb
LXXI BC: Ego sum Spartacus // MDCCCLVII: I am Dred Scott // MCMVL: Ich bin Anne Frank // MMX: Je suis Assange // MMXI: Ik ben von NotHaus
What a wonderful group of Liberty minded people spreading
the message to the sheeple. I hope and pray it sticks in the minds of many of them.
I'm with you Sister!
When Rachel was hired by the campaign, I had hoped that we were going to see allot more YouTubes with Rachel.. but it was like watching John Galt sell his engine to a corporation that took the engine off the market.
It's great to see Rachel, and I think it was smart to have C4L employ Rachel as the moderator, but I'm not a TV person or a tech, or a wanna be Rachel, I want to say what I'm about to say because seeing this video gives me the idea that
I think Rachel has talent that has been and is being wasted. Rachels's first YouTubes were POWERFUL and while this video is informative, I get a feeling that what we need to do is set Rachel up and let her be Rachel, because when she interviews the female CPAC attendee (It would have been nice to have a reference), Rachel absolutely transmitted to me the atmosphere of CPAC, better than MSM, and when she talks to Napoliano... it's like seeing a flame next to a toad. I'm sorry, for Judge makes some good points, buts hes not real... Rachel has a way of comming across the screne as REAL, and some folks look plastic.
Take Ron Paul... see how when Rachel comes up to him he brightens and jokes and he's very real. You can feel the compassion and warmth.
I really think Rachel needs to have her own show like Alex Jones or Glen Beck, etc.
WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
YES!
I agree, Rachel is a gem and her talent is being squandered.
Oh ya, I remember her...
She had that video 'Confessions of a Ron Paul junkie' right?
---
“The very word government means some men governing--ruling over others. But to the degree that men are ruled by other men, they exist in slavery. - The Market for Liberty - Linda + Morris Tannehill
Yes; Confessions of a Ron Paul Junkie
She should have a YouTube or TV?Cable/ show, :Confessions of a Republican Junkie",.. and if the GOP was smart, they would hire her for their PR. She's refreshing and far more real than Sarah Palin, who I like.
WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
Good points. Listening,
liberty media?