CATS Do Exist (Here's the proof!)
If you are going to read this it will not make sense unless you read to the end.
This is written in defense of all of us on this site. It is written because we all have talked conspiracy, but as we all know when we talk it, we automatically set our message and ourselves up to get slammed for doing such a horrible thing. That in itself is not so bad. What's bad is that quite often very valid and important information becomes suppressed or distorted in the process. Thus understanding the meaning of conspiracy and how it quite often can be the stimuli that provokes conflict will help us understand the nature of what were dealing with and, thus, how to develop a stronger and more effective argument to help build our case.
***************************
It seems using the word conspiracy always seems to touch a nerve with the so-called anti-conspiracy folk. Why is that so? If we look into the dictionary called "Newspeak," we see the word "Bellyfeel." What does "bellyfeel" mean? It means to react "uncritically" from a gut level, but not logically from the mind. For many times this is why people who claim to be anti-conspiracy minded attempt to avoid the topic simply because they have a sickening gut level response programed into them by the media to be repelled by the topic. An example of media-induced bellyfeel is illustrated when radio talk show hosts, Rush Limbaugh and Michael Medvid had "Conspiracy-Kook-Friday's." Other times the anti-conspiracy crowd could simply be agent provocateurs intentionally attempting to misdirect conversation, or keep selected topics covered up. It seems it’s OK when others, speak of conspiracies, but if anyone else should mention one that they don’t agree with or want to keep hidden, all of the sudden you get accused as being a sky is falling chicken little, a kook, or even being a dreaded conspiracy theorist.
The fact is conspiracies do exist and those who accuse others as being a “theorist” should look up the definition of “conspiracy” before they accuse.......... Then look in the mirror.
Here is how it is: There are three major forms of conspiracy, which most people here, only know of TWO. They are: 1) A common conspiracy, in which two or more collaborate in secret to do evil. 2) A subjective conspiracy, i.e. a “theory,” and, 3) “The open conspiracy,” which is what most people do not know about and is what we are dealing with -most of the time-. It is called the open conspiracy because it is out in the open, for all to see, to such a degree that it is in everyone’s face. The book, "The Open Conspiracy," was written by the same author who wrote 1984, George Orwell. In 1928 George Orwell, basically prophesied that the Open Conspiracy would eventually take place at a future date. Well it is here, now.
The open conspiracy plainly exists and is all around us. It is the matrix, that one can sense, but, cannot explain. All anyone has to do to recognize the open conspiracy is by being honest with ones self and look at all the crazy things that are going on in today's world. Intuitively you know that many of the things happening are not the results of something logical or natural.
With that said, conspiracies exist and are all around us all the time. They exist every bit like a cat exists. A cat exists not -only if- the critter should meow or should not meow, but, it exists, because it embody’s the definition of the words and the physical qualities of what it takes to be a cat. Likewise, conspiracies exist NOT because the conspiracy may or may not be a theory, or everyone already knows about it, or if very few know about it. It does NOT matter if the conspiracy may be old or brand new. It does not matter if the conspiracy is any longer a secret or not, because once its out in the open it is no longer a secret. BUT, nevertheless, conspiracies exist when the criteria of the DEFINITION is met: "Two or more collaborating in secret to do evil."
The point to all of this is, that when one is talking conspiracy, they're more than likely to be talking about the open conspiracy. Thus, without knowing or utilizing the conspiracy "type" in its proper context, leaves the door open to the message becoming debased, losing it's credibility and losing your argument.
To sum up:
Win your argument by clarifying -if or when- the definition of conspiracy has been met.
v9
Your usually dealing with an
Your usually dealing with an emotional mindset when someone argues against a conspiracy.They use trigger words that trigger the emotional programming that is embedded in people via the media, such as where you mention conspiracy kook Fridays.
This kind of show embeds in folks emotional programing that anyone who thinks there is a conspiracy is a kook. They don't even realize it's happening to them. People don't want to be labeled or classified with the group (conspiracy advocates) that is being ridiculed by such shows.
The irony is the Shows themselves even call it programming. Perhaps people should look up the definition of "programming" too... ;-)
-----
Get Prepared!
Only dead fish go with the flow...
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
"Open Conspiracy" local node of control
How many of you have a Masonic Temple in your hometown?
Wow, this is sooo well written.
Thank you. I like the words OPEN Conspiracy because that nails it.
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
Re: Wow,..............
Thanks for the Thank you quiltingsando. Hope I've made it clear enough for everyone to understand.
Conspiracies
I agree with the person who started this thread.
**repeat of what I've written elsewhere**
It's amazing how MSM indoctrination causes a "slide response" (go look up that term) in people upon hearing the word "conspiracy"; causing their brains to go into complete shutdown mode (other words have a similar effect). Funny, because that is not the case in other countries/cultures.
The use of 'conspiracy theory' as a derogatory -- as an epithet almost -- is something the propagandists have perfected over the decades, and it's a useful tool for eliminating articulate dissent and other points of view. So now the label "conspiracy theorist" is used to discredit anyone seeking answers.
Conspiracies obviously DO exist otherwise there wouldn't be a word for in it the friggin' English language, and we wouldn't even be using the word right now, nor would they be against the LAW. It is a civil and criminal charge you know. They are actually quite common. They happen all the time. That's why laws against them have been in place for at least a few hundred years. Don't forget, you can't have a conspiracy charge all by itself - there must be some other underlying crime (or tort in civil law) to get a conspiracy conviction; i.e. conspiracy to commit murder, conspiracy to defraud, etc.
But fairly recently, in the MSM, the definition seems to be changing from "two or more people working together towards some evil or illegal end" to being associated with tin foil hats, kool aid, paranoia and UFO chasers in an attempt to squash the truth. Go back and read the old definitions of "conservative", "liberal", "republican", "democrat", "semitic", "terrorist", "occult", "gay"(great example here) and other terms to see how their meanings have been changed slowly over the years to benefit the implementation of the NWO.
Anybody that denies the existence of conspiracies, must be delusional or involved in conspiracies. I often tell deniers that they can call me a conspiracy theorist if I can call them 'coincidence theorists'. I guess some actually believe evil people don't work together towards evil ends. Fact of the matter is, most GOOD people are not willing participants in conspiracies (occasionally some are knowingly involved, or duped into getting involved), but for the most part, evil people are the ones that hatch and execute the majority of them. BTW, it does not necessarily have to be a secret, but it would need to be proven that the alleged conspriators are aware of the desired end result.
Also, the word "theory" has no place next to the word "conspiracy". I have never heard of terms like "Fraud theory", or "Murder theory" thrown around. Someone is accused of a crime, the evidence is presented and they are found guilty or not-guilty. Nowhere in legal procedure is the charge considered a "theory" before it's proven or disproven.
What's even funnier about the propagandists putting the word "theory" behind "conspiracy" (in order to make it seem like by saying "theory" thay can imply that means "non-existent"), is the fact that a theory, outside of mathematics, is a very high level of proof. And obviously these shills think it's ok to call other thing theories like "the theory of evolution", and the "theory of relativity" and believe they are true.
There's no doubt in my mind that IF we could ever get a FAIR trial (which probably would never happen) that we would have no problem coming up with enough evidence to charge Bush/Cheney/Paulson/Rockefeller and the lot of them with conspiracy..along with fraud, treason and a bunch of other stuff.
When you think of the "official story" about 9/11, they are describing a conspiracy; 19+ arabs conspiring to commit murder. It's funny, but the MSM NEVER never uses the word to descibe it that way. I guess they don't want to use the word properly, for fear the public will actually start using it properly. Occasionally you'll hear it in the MSM - like Lil' Kim getting convicted of conspiracy - but it seems we're only allowed to see the little conspiracies, while the big ones committed by big wigs are met with denial and labeled as "theories".
But WE should start using it properly.
In other words, call 'em out when you see them! But remember, something illegal has to have been done.
Therefore, even though some say there was an MSM conspiracy against Ron Paul during the primary, there really wasn't because NOTHING ILLEGAL was done (of course, you make the case that unjust and immoral laws are put into place by the NWO so their activities are technically legal). So you CAN say there was a concerted effort to squash him, but *technically* there was no conspiracy.
However, there seemed to be an effort to fix the vote totals in certain places against RP. Now, THAT would be a conspiracy. Obviously, rigging the vote is against the law (as if we could ever prove that - the NWO crowd would make sure we couldn't).
As far as the poster's observation that there is an "open conspiracy", I offer this summation:
Everything in this world is upside down. Everything is a deception, everything is smoke and mirrors.
Doctors destroy health
Lawyers destroy justice
Universities destroy knowledge
Governments destroy freedom
Media destroys information
Religions destroy spirituality
Nothing is as it seems.
I especially like
I especially like the paragraph, where you state:
Also, the word "theory" has no place next to the word "conspiracy". I have never heard of terms like "Fraud theory", or "Murder theory" thrown around. Someone is accused of a crime, the evidence is presented and they are found guilty or not-guilty. Nowhere in legal procedure is the charge considered a "theory" before it's proven or disproven.
Good observation.
Thanks ArmorOfChrist777
For the extra input, clairity and added discourse. I really hope many more people see this thread and your post, because it is of vital importance and the topic must be "untabooed".
What percentage..........
Its a wonderous thought to consider "what percentage of the world is still under the control of bellythink?" For we all are to some degree...........
The book, "The Open Conspiracy," was written by the same author
The book, "The Open Conspiracy," was written by the same author who wrote 1984, H.G. Wells.
George Orwell wrote 1984, as well as Animal Farm.
Yes...........
OrWell, Orson Wells, H.G. Wells, Oh Well I give up. Thank you, I will update........... always get em mixed up.
Cats are paid shills working
Cats are paid shills working for the MEOW.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
Ending
You're a joke.
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
This response is just too
This response is just too cryptic.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
Cats exist as a
Cats exist as a superposition of all possible states until by act of observation the wave function collapses and the cat behaves as a particle.
I think you just described
Heisenberg's uncertain kitty principle.
__________
--------------------------------
"the only thing that keeps the banking system from failing is general ignorance about how the banking system works."
----------------------------
They must have called
They must have called "Confuse-A-Cat".
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
Seriously,
Execellent reply though.
Excellent reply...........
I waz gonna say it exactly like that, but I thought no one would understand?
The obvious and not so obvious results of Conspiracy cause me
"bellyfeel" but rather than a spirit of fear--we must overcome this gut feeling, be strong and stand up for liberty in our words and actions.
Re: The obvious and not so obvious...........
You also sumed things up pretty good in your old post.
The word "conspiracy" is used to marginalize, and yet conspiracies abound in many ways. The intent of labeling people as conspiracy freaks, is to try to cause a knee-jerk reaction for sheeple to ignore the truth of what is being said.
Could Not Have...........
Could Not Have Said It Better!
Most interesting.
Now I have a name to put to "political correctness" which quite frankly, pisses me off. I hate it, I despise it and yet everyone tiptoes around because of it, afraid of offending someone. Clearly an example of an open conspiracy.
Pat
BOHICA!!
Pat
BOHICA!!
Political Correctness is Evil
Because it's a distortion of the truth.
PC reminds me of "Newspeak" from 1984 except that when we learn that a term is no longer PC, we police ourselves by not using the term anymore for fear of offending someone/anyone.
Wait a cotton pickin'
Wait a cotton pickin' minute! I was also going to mention the kind of enviromentalism that tramples people's rights as another example, but in a (gulp) PC moment, I didn't! Enought already! Down with political correctness. We all just need to start saying what we mean.
Pat
BOHICA!!
Pat
BOHICA!!
Re: Wait a cotton.........
Thanks Pat. You've got it right on all that environmental crap. I've been trying to figure out how to communicate this stuff for years. Posted an old version of this a week ago......... Not many replies. Guess people just still don't understand how important or relative understanding this information is?
Thanks again.