0 votes

What would be a good slogan to wake people up to the 9-11 info?

Or not?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
fireant's picture

911-Who Did It???

The FBI has not charged bin Laden due to lack of evidence, so where does the evidence lead?
Thanks for changing the heading deepcover. Bump for more ideas.

Undo what Wilson did

9-11 defying the law of

9-11 defying the law of physics one building at a time

Formerly rprevolutionist

I like that one.

It's short and simple, yet says it all.

Investigate the war on physics!

We have entered a new phenomenon where the laws of physics no longer operate in a reliable manner. Insurance rates will skyrocket now we know that fires can make a building fall down with the speed of gravity, and planes when they crash leave no obvious fuselage.

Not sure if it's worth it.


It's good of you to be passionate about 9/11 and wanting to bring your fellow citizens to some clarity/truth about what happened. But you have a very uphill struggle.

Most Americans have jobs, families, responsibilities and are probably worried about many things other than 9/11. Banks are failing, the global economy is tanking and job security is at a very low point.

9/11 was 8 years ago and is really not on the minds of many these days: there are other, more pressing, priorities - like survival.

Still, if you feel passionate about bringing the truth (as you see it) to others, then by all means go for it.

The USS Liberty,

then 9/11, what's next on the agenda to keep America engaged in fighting other country's wars for them? How much more American blood will it take?

Wake-Up-Edia

A site that could gather all the info now spread over thousands of sites. We need some people to put this together.

Jesse Ventura's line.

"I don't believe that two planes knocked down three buildings."

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

How about: "Yippee-ki-yay,

How about: "Yippee-ki-yay, ************!"
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

These

"Follow the Money"

First read about The USS Liberty otherwise you won't get it!!

Gollum / Lieberman 2012 "Feel the Dream"

Cows think they are free, this is no bull, the beast must be Fed, with pitchfork instead

Cows think they are free, this is no bull, the beast must be Fed, with pitchfork instead

"Who put the pools of molten steel ...

... under the three collapsed World Trade Center towers?"

History

Slogan - " 9-11, who's your source for information?"

I'd look at history. It has been said FDR knew Japan was coming to bomb Pearl Harbor. Get a video or audio clip of that and then ask, ' 9-11, who's your source for information?'

Detective Krum Investigates:
http://victory1project.wordpress.com/
http://v1-p.com/

Detective Krum Investigates:
http://victory1project.wordpress.com/

How 'bout ...

"HOT TOPIC: 9/11 was a 'Thermite' Job!" Then put in your favorite website address.

Lead them to the science first; it's less threatening. Then, this way they can decide whether its a "conspiracy" theory or not.

Joint CIA/MOSSAD/ISI Inside JOB! Follow the money!

"All great truths begin as blasphemies."

"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."

fireant's picture

Leading Question.

The only thing known with reasonable certainty is the official version is suspect. In my view, stating "911 was an inside job" does the truth movement more harm than good. It appears there must have been some level of inside cooperation in order for the attack to have been pulled off, but there has not been enough testimony to know who, or what level of inside involvement. It is unthinkable for most Americans that "the government" committed such an act of treason, so asserting "inside job" merely affirms the "kook" image portrayed by the "official" hacks. "Inside job" is a catchy slogan, but it portrays the wrong image and repels potential new allies.
A better question for this board may be, "What is a good slogan to help sell 911 truth?"

Undo what Wilson did

Fireant makes a good reply,

and one that deserves to be discussed.

Truthers recognize that this issue is not readily accepted by the firmly brainwashed general public. So, we're not ignorant of the concerns.

There are 2 schools of thought on the subject.
One says, "Shout them awake", and the other says "Don't shock them, and give them a little info, so they can come into the movement".
There is reasonable basis for both approaches.
"Shouting them awake" gets them into a protective mode that may challenge them to do research and then they find things they didn't know, and it can lead to them understanding and coming back for more.
"Slow and steady", is like spoon-feeding a baby, and some will respond to that, as long as you don't gag them. And this takes time, but it can work too.
The idea is to get them to a point where they will leave the nest and figure the rest out on their own time, and then come back to discuss the particulars, and then they become part of the group. They have to fly on their own.

I have brought alot of folks into this overall movement over the last 30 years, and I found that both approaches can work, but you need to assess each individual you speak to, so as to be able to connect with him/her.
So, I don't think it's just a matter of one approach all the time. Do what works in each particular case..

Very few people can accept anything we talk about here, coming in "cold", without any preparation. Their entire world views revolve around their programming, and we are going to be a glass of cold water in their faces, no matter what we do.

We can see this right here on this website. There are beginners, and there are people who've been around for a few years, and there are people who've been doing this their entire lives. There is no way that a newbie is going to match an "old timer" in breadth of knowledge on these subjects.
And until they get enough knowledge, they tend to be protective of certain ideas that they are not comfortable to let go of.
It's very difficult to come to the conclusion that almost everything you think you know, has actually been lies.
However, there are some that catch on real quick.

So, I take it in a "triage" sort of approach, like combat medics, because time is getting short.
I have a conversation.
I identify the possibility of a person accepting certain concepts.
If they show promise that they can wake up, I work with them.
If not, I let them go.
You can't save everyone. You do what you can, and your efforts need to bear fruit, because we don't have time to waste on the impossible cases.
I know that sounds hard, but those are the facts.

To directly answer your question about "selling 9/11 truth" it can only be done on a case-by-case basis, by footsoldiers like us taking an interest in a person who can grasp what we're saying.

The "megaphone" that we use on websites like this, is to attract people who are already questioning authority, and are somewhat prepped for further info. When they come in looking, we can give them their answers, or give them reasons why we suspect certain things, but can't prove it yet.
Then they do their own research and become part of the group.

It's not just some "marketing idea" that we can swing into motion, that will grab large segments of the population. That's not going to happen. There's too much momentum from their previous programming to expect that to happen.
So, we'll work with who we can get.
And that's really the simple answer. it takes work by each one of us on the ground floor level to bring them in one at a time. Just like the RP campaign did. This is not something you can sell on a TV commercial. It's just too complex, and goes against the grain too hard, to do in 30 seconds.

A good way to start would be, during a conversation about the sad state of affairs we find outselves in, if they think this is all "accidental" or if they think it might be part of a planned effort. If they are willing to consider that a plan has taken us here, then we have PLENTY of information that can support that idea, and then they are one of us.

fireant's picture

Good points.

One on one is always the best sales method, and adapting to the "customer" is on target. Banners and slogans however, fall more into the marketing category (setting the stage for effective sales), and I am looking for a more sellable slogan, or eye grabber.

Undo what Wilson did

It is easy to draw

It is easy to draw conclusions from weak data. The most that could be said is that the information is either incomplete or that it seems "funny". Because it does not conform with previous experience does not automatically mean it is wrong, just different enough to warrant closer attention.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

I know.

That gov't story IS really weak and full of holes, and people are actually buying into it, because they don't know any better.

I think if people actually knew that the people who were in charge of things when 9/11 took place, were the same people who wrote the report that declared a necessity for a "new Pearl Harbor" type event to take place to swing their plans for world hegemony into action, it could definitely raise some eyebrows.
I don't think many people even know about the PNAC report.
Those fingerprints are all over this.

You deliberately

You deliberately misunderstood what I meant in order to make it look like I agree with you, which I likely do not. Both "sides" of the story are inconsistent, but I find far more inconsistencies on the truther side.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

Inside of what ?

I suppose the perpetrators were inside the plane, so yea, it was.

Now what ever else they were inside of I can't say, and neither can anyone else with any certainty.

yes, without any doubt.

"americas war on terrorism" by michael chossudovsky

"terrorstorm" on google video

www.INFOWARS.com www.survivalblog.com www.rense.com

"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas." - Brock Adams, Director UN Health Organization

'This campaign against the American people -against traditional American culture and values - is systematic psychological warfare. It is orchestrated by a vast array of interests comprising not only the Eastern establishment but also the radical left. Among this group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, the money center banks and multinational coporations, the media, the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the large tax-exempt foundations.

Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a New World Order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called New World Order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles. . . .

The psychological campaign that I am describing, as I have said, is the work of groups within the Eastern establishment, that amorphous amalgam of wealth and social connections whose power resides in its control over our financial system and over a large portion of our industrial sector. The principal instrument of this control over the American economy and money is the Federal Reserve System. The policies of the Industrial sectors, primarily the multinational corporations, are influenced by the money center banks through debt financing and through the large blocks of stock controlled by the trust departments of the money center banks.

Anyone familiar with American history, and particularly American economic history, cannot fail to notice the control over the Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency which Wall Street seems to exercise....

The influence of establishment insiders over our foreign policy has become a fact of life in our time. This pervasive influence runs contrary to the real long-term national security of our Nation. It is an influence which, if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our constitutional order.

The viewpoint of the establishment today is called globalism. Not so long ago, this viewpoint was called the "one-world" view by its critics. The phrase is no longer fashionable among sophisticates; yet, the phrase "one-world" is still apt because nothing has changed in the minds and actions of those promoting policies consistent with its fundamental tenets.

Mr. President, in the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power. Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy.

In this point of view, the activities of international financial and industrial forces should be oriented to bringing this one-world design - with a convergence of the Soviet and American systems as its centerpiece - into being. . . . All that matters to this club is the maximization of profits resulting from the practice of what can be described as finance capitalism, a system which rests upon the twin pillars of debt and monopoly. This isn't real capitalism. It is the road to economic concentration and to political slavery."
- jesse helms

Obviously it was to anyone

Obviously it was to anyone who actually thinks.

Yes

I'm convinced.

HOWEVER: I'm not sure if I'd like to see this as a frequent topic on the Daily Paul. For me, the DP is about the freedom movement and continuing the ideals of the first American Revolution. I would guess the majority of DP'ers would support a new investigation. Can't we please leave it at that? There're tons of other sites which deal with 911 ad nauseum. I realize many issues are intertwined but can't we set the minute details aside and just recognize the majority would support a new investigation and make allowances for those who are not yet ready to confront this issue?