Who here is a 'libertarian feminist'?

If your a libertarian you don't need to be a feminist. We should fight for EVERYONE, not just a specific gender, race or religious proclivity. I'm all for equal pay, rights, etc., but from everything I've ever witnessed from so called feminists, it normally equates to being a "man hater". I remember a story a few years back from Henry Makow where he described a group of feminist from a prodigious college that had rally's cutting paper penises in half and laughing and celebrating. Feminism, as it's touted has out grown the original intent. That original intent should be equality for all.

It's not a new concept.

in my mind, feminism is about equality for women.

same wage as men for the same job, right to vote, right to marry who they want to, right to work, a workplace free from sexual harassment, right to own real estate, right to sell their own real estate without the permission of their husband, right not to be beat by their husband, right not to be killed by their husband or family ('honor' killings) etc...

whether the nwo funded it, started it, or just helped it along... it was LONG overdue. freedom and liberty are not just the prerogative of men.

i'll take today's reality over this dumb 1955 sh!t, any day!!

Housekeeping Monthly 1955
http://a6.vox.com/6a00c2251fc9698e1d00c225289b2e549d-pi

or how about...

Housekeeping Monthly 1955
http://a6.vox.com/6a00c2251fc9698e1d00c225289b2e549d-pi

we only 'recently' got the right to vote and own property.

alberta still has a dumb @ss real estate law on the books.

there is still some major sh!t that goes on in some male dominated workplaces. i would say that is not the norm anymore though.

i've observed the crap my cousin puts up with and its just sad. she won a human rights case against her last employer for the amount of sexual harassment she went through.

before i got into real estate i did security. i had excellent training and had to pass a physical exam. i don't expect special treatment. i also worked with fabulous guys. never once had an issue.

just because a girl works in a physically challenging, male dominated job doesn't mean she still can't be a girly girl.

i have observed with a friend of mine who is a cop... we observed it with mostly female cops....

you often have to go from nice to b!tch pretty rapidly in some situations to be taken seriously. whereas a male cop in the same situation wouldn't have that issue. that's a flaw in society though not the female cop.

some men can't handle strong women. that's THEIR problem. none of the cool women i know hang out with men like that.

strong women kick @ss. i'll take being independent, brilliant, outspoken, and sassy than the BS they were peddling in the 50's.

i have tons of girl friends with kids. i have a friend who i used to work with in security. she's a stay at home mom now. they adjusted their lifestyle so they could do that. i think that's cool.

there really aren't that many limits on a woman in the western world.

BOTH parents ought to be able to spend more time with their children.

THAT reality will happen a lot quicker with sound money, no taxes, and less government.

because there were real issues that women had with men about their rapacious conduct with women who chose to work outside the home and not being paid the same. Women also brought up legitimately, that men needed to spend more time with their children. This was all appropriate.

But no sooner did these 'threatening' complaints make in in mainstream media, we saw the rise of Gloria Steinem and the Rockefeller/CIA backed Ms. magazine which modeled 'the new woman', calling for 'change' in family life with the introduction and promotion of Big Pharma contraception pill that did more for promiscuity than anything could because its use led to the dishonor and negation of the spiritual, 'sexual responsibility'.

We saw an increase in STD's and eventually this led to AIDs and then of course, abortion, for those who did not take 'the pill' or they forgot to.

We saw the rise of homosexuality as a chic 'lifestyle' alternative to 'family life' (not that I have anything against 'real' gays, but this was twisted). We saw these ideas promoted in University courses in political science, the new 'women's studies' courses that in fact promote Lesbian lifestyles (not that I have anything against Lesbians) but these were/are 'fake' and bogus.
This was and still is a deliberate attempt to social engineer us and our families. The bankers knew that if they could 'break down' American families, this would create a break down of our Constitutional government. This is absolutely no different than what was done to the Native Americans and their once 'strong' culture. They had to break down the 'family structure' in order to 'weaken' the system.

All of these 'ideas' were concocted in the think tanks of the CFR and their affiliated institutes and introduced at their secret Bilderberg meetings as heads of Universities, big Media conglomerates were brought together and given their new 'ideas' for University courses and Media articles. Notice how all these things would occur one thing after another, gradually, gradually leading to what we have now. It is all kept in place now with ADL tactics of political correctness and those that disagree can now be considered 'hate speech' and a 'terrorist'.

No I would not wish to be considered a 'Libertarian Feminist' at all. I am a simple woman and it gives me immense pleasure when men are men and women are women, but most of all, I love it when people are just 'true to themselves' whether they are gay or not, yet choose to resist all the mind control.

in today's meaning of the word isn't good no matter how you look at it in my book. It was a movement initiated by the NWO. It is unbiblical and the good parts of it could have happened without the bad parts of it. The NWO instigated it in order to split up families, get the women working and bringing in taxes for them, and get the kids away from the parents and into state care. Since the movement began, our families have gone straight to pot. I am a feminist only in not supporting the brutality and aggressiveness of men over women, but that is really not feminism. I am libertarian for sure and my own definition of feminist. The greatest full time job and service to humanity that a woman can perform is to raise her own children without the help of day care and extended school care, preferrably without schools period and to take care of the homefront and hold it together while the man is out. Get the women out of the work place and things would go a lot smoother at home for many reasons. On the other hand, if the woman is working, there should be equality there to the extent that she can perform as well or better than a man in the situation. Women should be able to work when and where they desire.

I do not appreciate the junk that the so-called feminist movement has imposed on us ladies.

I am not a man. I have no desire to be one.

I want men to be men.

shows strength. The whole feminist movement as such has always horrified me, and yes I am a woman.
For some obscure reason I would feel offended if they believed I was a feminist. Too many connotations to that word to feel comfortable with, mostly because I felt it was aiming at taking away one's femininity.
You don't have to go overboard to stand up for freedom.

Later, reading about how this whole movement was pushed to undermine society strengthens me to resist ever wanting to be anything else but my own person.

To me, I have that concept of the feminists as being the 'armpit' brigade... thanks but no thank you.