Food Safety Modernization Act Feedback.
The other day, I wrote a post on the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009: HR 875 being introduced to Congress by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D –CT), in which I made the erroneous statement that her husband, Stanley Greenberg, worked for Monsanto. I also included in this post extracts from emails sent to me by Jill Richardson, an intelligent and passionate campaigner for organic farming. To her credit, when she read my post, she immediately sent me an urgent email, warning me that there was a great deal of misinformation buzzing around the Internet, which I had unwittingly included in my post. She herself pointed out that (1) the bill has nothing to do with Monsanto, (2) Rep. DeLauro’s husband is a pollster for a company that once had Monsanto as a customer a decade ago, but he in no way ‘works’ for Monsanto, (3) HR 875 as it currently stands is very unlikely to even pass, and (4) the group behind disseminating this trumped-up propaganda is NICFA, whose mission statement maintains their goal is to ‘promote and preserve unregulated direct farmer-to-consumer trade’ and ‘oppose any government funded or managed National Animal Identification System. This organization has been aided by the support of a woman named Linn Cohen-Cole, whose unsubstantiated and exaggerated claims in an obsessive crusade20against Monsanto, Hillary Clinton, Obama and anyone else in an imagined government ‘plot’ to nationalize farming does seem to indicate a serious lack of credibility.
I have since been in contact with Rep. DeLauro’s office, and they have confirmed that Rep. DeLauro has been meeting with organic farmers to draw up a proposed list of amendments to HR 875 based on those discussions. While these amendments are not yet public knowledge, and would be an informal document to clarify the bill, she and her staff would be happy to get the word out that the Congresswoman is indeed working very hard on improving both the bill and her office’s relationship with organic and small farmers. And to Rep. DeLauro, I add my personal apologies for any inadvertent misinformation regarding herself or her husband presented in my post.
To set the record straight:
There is no language in HR 875 that would regulate, penalize, or shut down backyard gardens or ‘criminalize’ gardeners; the bill focuses on ensuring the safety of food in interstate commerce.
Farmer’s markets would not be regulated, fined, or shut down, and would, in fact, benefit from strict safety standards applied to imported food to ensure that unsafe imported food doesn’t compete with locally grown produce.
The bill would not prohibit or interfere with organic farming, or mandate the use of any chemicals or types of seeds. The National Organic Program (NOP) is under the jurisdiction of the USDA. HR 875 addresses food safety issues and falls under the jurisdiction of the FDA.
Monsanto and any other large agribusiness company had no part whatsoever in drafting this bill, and Rep. DeLauro’s husband and his company do no lobbying on this issue.
HR 875 has nothing to do with any national animal ID system, which would fall under the jurisdiction of the USDA, and not the FDA.
This isn’t a done deal – the bill hasn’t yet even been considered by any Congressional committee, nevermind seen any debate or proposed amendments. There is no ‘plot’ to ram this through Congress and into law.
I'm telling you it just keeps getting tougher to find the wheat for all the chaff. Guess we just keep on top of things, communicate, keep an open mind and hope we can help each other from being mislead by the misinformation machines that seem to be running full out on each side of the aisle.





















It's a set up. One foot in the door.
It can eliminate local control of food and farming practices.
On March 28th, 2009 RawfoodLiberty says:
A great concern to many of us right now is the right to EAT PURE NATURAL FOOD . . . in contrast to the genetically engineered, refined, prepared, and processed foods that make up most of the supermarket food items.
Because profit is low on PURE NATURAL WHOLE FOODS, the food industry has turned to value-added (convenience, taste, excitement) processed foods to create a profit-making business.
Now they seem to be very aggressively trying to cement their spot on your dinner plate. HR 875 - creation of a Food Safety Administration to Control Food from Growth to Table appears to be a dangerous restriction of commerce in that it can eliminate local control of food and farming practices. Do you want the same people that offer you foodlike items that entice you into bad disease-producing eating habits and away from healthy whole foods. to control the people who can offer your the real thing in food.
Click on this web address to learn about the latest move:
(it's six short paragraphs and a few links) take a minute and click)
http://www.thenhf.com/press_releases/pr_26_mar_2009.html
Join a petition and alert congressional members of the dangers of this bill.
Our numbers count at the ballot box and at the cashier. They can only count if each of us speaks up.
And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”
Food Safety Modernization Act Feedback.
Dear Synthetic Solutions,
My name is Deborah Stockton and I am the Executive Director of the National Independent Consumers and Farmers Association (NICFA).
In the following excerpt from your post of 27 March, 2009, “Food Safety Modernization Act Feedback” you accuse NICFA of "disseminating this trumped-up propaganda" and being "aided by the support of a woman named Linn Cohen-Cole" :
“She herself pointed out that (1) the bill has nothing to do with Monsanto, (2) Rep. DeLauro’s husband is a pollster for a company that once had Monsanto as a customer a decade ago, but he in no way ‘works’ for Monsanto, (3) HR 875 as it currently stands is very unlikely to even pass, and (4) the group behind disseminating this trumped-up propaganda is NICFA, whose mission statement maintains their goal is to ‘promote and preserve unregulated direct farmer-to-consumer trade’ and ‘oppose any government funded or managed National Animal Identification System. This organization has been aided by the support of a woman named Linn Cohen-Cole, whose unsubstantiated and exaggerated claims in an obsessive crusade against Monsanto, Hillary Clinton, Obama and anyone else in an imagined government ‘plot’ to nationalize farming does seem to indicate a serious lack of credibility.”
NICFA is not "disseminating this trumped-up propaganda," nor have we been "aided by the support of a woman named Linn Cohen-Cole." NICFA opposes HR 875, in part, because its language would place under the authority of a "Food Safety Administrator" every farm in the country (and even out of the country if owned by an American). Because the bill does not strictly define farm, it necessarily includes any and all such places the Administrator decides are farms.
From HR 875:
(14) FOOD PRODUCTION FACILITY- The term `food production facility' means any farm, ranch, orchard, vineyard, aquaculture facility, or confined animal-feeding operation.
The bill, over 100 pages long, would give the proposed "Food Safety Administration" authority to oversee essentially all management aspects of every farm in the United States. Please read the bill at http://www.thomas.gov for further details.
Deborah Stockton, Executive Director
National Independent Consumers and Farmers Association (NICFA)
info@nicfa.org
http://www.nicfa.org
Our purpose is to promote and preserve unregulated direct farmer-to-consumer trade
that fosters availability of locally grown or home-produced food products.
NICFA opposes any government funded or managed National Animal Identification System.
I would welcome Linn Cohen-Cole's aid in opposing HR 875!
I have had an opportunity to read articles by Linn from an agricultural email group I belong to. At first Linn didn't seem to understand the pressures family farmers and ranchers were dealing with, and her take appeared to be that we should be able to sit at the table with environmentalists and reach a consensus, and she was wanting to help achieve this.
Over the months I have read her writing, she has educated herself well, and she is alarmed about NAIS, and HR 875. She is intelligent, willing to change her opinion when she finds out she doesn't have it right. I respect that---it is something that many of us have done! Ron Paul admitted the same in his speech to C4L in St. Louis.
Thanks
People need to be careful jumping to conclusions about something, if they haven't done their homework. It is easy to do.
Healthnut4freedom
"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct thy paths." Proverbs 3:5,6
Healthnut4freedom
The lip of truth shall be established forever: but a lying tongue is but for a moment...Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are His delight. Prov 12:19,22
Feedback
I cannot vouch for everything written in "Food Safety Modernization Act Feedback," however it does fail to mention many important things, such as:
From what I see, H.R. 875 would transfer regulatory powers from the independent states making them the minor power in governing food laws and making the newly established national Food Safety Administration (FSA) the major.
This normally results in more and more ever growing regulations eventually regulating to the point where the small farmers can no longer handle, nor afford, all the added regualtory pressures eventually putting many (if not nearly all) out of business.
Thanks for the update. I've been
affirmation: President Paul
on the phone with NOFA-NY and the Cornucopia Institute and they basically said the same thing you did. NOFA-NY is one of the groups working with the congresswoman to change the language. Basically, rules for the large agribusinesses should not be applying to small family farmers and backyard gardens. It's clearly not a "one size fits all." We should all stay on top of this but, so far, everything seems to be okay. It's wonderful to see so many people with passion about their food; we just need to get our facts straight, myself included, which is an overwhelming task in itself.
affirmation: President Paul 2008
Thanks for your update, and for working
for truth, not being stuck on erroneous dead ends. Clarity helps us see what are the real battles to fight.
I too have noticed that
I too have noticed that sometimes passion becomes an inaccurate depiction of what is really going on with some state and national bills that we oppose. We have to be open to listening to the other side and get the facts straight.
Lots of far Left Liberals and democrats like organic farming and would never want that taken away.
This is wonderful news and I commend you for ...
updating your post. I know there will be those who rant about the "panic" caused by the mis-info on the internet.... BUT I would point out that it is only because of that mis-info that organic farmers, and natural food proponents CALLED their congress people and DEMANDED that this be looked into and GOT these people looking at the bill.
So it is our constant VIGILANCE that we must maintain to keep all of those in Washington on their toes. They already feel like they can do whatever they want with no opposition. Something like the scare over this bill shows them we are still out there and will not be TRUSTING any more. So GOOD NEWS, and lets not lower our guard! The power of the internet is once again shown to work in many cases.
_____________________________________________________________
"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6pAcBXt2j8
Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever."
Viva La Revolucion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmaTNf4YhEs
Thanks
For your well thought out response to this post. I agree, we must remain vigilant and we should all be appreciative of the existence of the internet.
I have had many people tell me in response to this or that. They say, "keep in mind anybody can say anything they want on the interent" and my response to that is, "that is exacly why I trust it as a source of information as opposed to network news which is limited to only a few people not being able to say anything they want. I would rather have access to all kinds of information and decide on its credibility myself.
David-
This makes it sound
as if this Act/Legislation isn't really all that bad..... your thoughts......
Re: This makes it sound
My thoughts............
I cannot vouch for everything written in "FSMA Feedback," however it does fail to mention many important things, such as:
From what I see, H.R. 875 would transfer ALL state control over food from the states to the newly established national Food Safety Administration (FSA). This normally results in more and more ever growing regulations eventually regulating to the point where the small farmers can no longer handle it, nor afford, all the added regualtory pressures eventually putting many (if not nearly all) out of business.
Two steps forward, one back
your thoughts..........