Get It Straight: Self-Defense Militias Are NOT BADSubmitted by Hard Work on Fri, 03/27/2009 - 16:18
Basic common sense, along with the laws of natural life, and also righteously codified in the reminders that were the founding documents, all point to the BASIC conclusion that self-defense militias - meaning loosely organized free individuals prepared to defend their lives, liberties and property, can only be viewed as bad by those who intend to COMMIT AGGRESSION against such free people.
If a so-called "militia" were to be performing acts of aggression, yes, that would be problematic and worthy of popular outcry, as well as more forceful DEFENSE against it.
However, if people simply form groups of free association based on mutual SELF DEFENSE, how on earth could any right thinking individual have a problem with this?
Militias were written into the Bill of Rights for a reason, they are the PEOPLE'S TRUE DEFENSE. Those who are systematically attacking groups of people interested in defending themselves are the real ones peaceful people need to be wary of.
Those who are Anti-Constitution and Anti-Freedom and Anti-Self Defense will try to subvert the meaning of the word "militia", but the fact of the matter is, the defense of the people is ultimately up to themselves and this is in fact Constitutional and beyond righteous.
Enough of the nonsense already.