Judge Napolitano's "Freedom Watch" Webcast 4-1, 2pm ET

Thanks for the link.

Dugg. Thanks for the link.

Sure there is a portion of blinded Obama supporters, but I have been able to talk to many who are not completely star struck and I've been able to turn them towards embracing Dr. Pauls message. And it greatly helps that when they start watching RP videos that he never outright rails against Obama thus closing the persons mind who is watching. If someone verbally attacks someone you identify with already, it is rare that you will be able to rationalize the message that the person is putting out there.

but come on, he's a talking head. He was fortunate to be sitting there with the Judge and Celente. Besides, he was late. Had he been at the set on time, maybe the Judge would have had him in the middle. But I doubt it. ; - )

Edit:

Celente's comment regarding deregulation was largely misconstrued, as he was actually referring to the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act during the Clinton administration, which enabled the plundering of nearly every pension fund in the world.

The Glass-Steagall Act, passed in 1933, mandated the separation of commercial and investment banking in order to protect depositors from the hazards of risky investment and speculation. It worked fine for fifty years until the banking industry began lobbying for its repeal during the 1980s, the go-go years of Reaganesque market fundamentalism, an outlook embraced wholeheartedly by mainstream Democrats under the rubric "neoliberalism."

Here's the article that paragraph came from, check it out.

http://www.counterpunch.org/kaufman09192008.html

He is sort of right. With a government subsidized and regulated banking system, you'd BETTER regulate or things will go insane. Of course, this does sidestep the reality that without the government interference to begin with you wouldnt need that regulation.

What about when Obama said that little joke on Leno's show? It was only mentioned, once, the next day.

To me, Obama is the greatest car salesman of all time, and with that comes some shallowness. Dick Cheney, you might be right, I hate to say that, but BHO's out of his league.

It's obvious Ron Paul is a patient man. He doesn't seem to go into personal attacks, and if he started to it might look unnatural. His philosophical battle is what counts. All in all, he does a good job i.e., the Limbaugh affair.

Yet, having a partisan debate would be great. Maybe on economics, there needs to be serious debates on a whole host of issues; social security, health care, Medicaid, private central banks vs. free-market banks, the IRS, our empire, the MIC, 9/11, etc., etc. Instead, there's hardly a debate about any of these. The MSM instead gives us, not a debate about whether or not gov't intervention is necessary or not, but how much the gov't will intervene. NPR in particular has stoked my ire. They are basically inaugurating more world government with the coverage of the g-20. That's gov't funded radio, for ya.

^^^We need to build political strength and political will$%$%

Ron Paul later pointed out that they want a world government and will say anything to get it.

Which one of you should be better able to convince Obama supporters to see the light? You or Dr. Paul?

I agree with Dr. Paul's assessment: Obama is ignorant, but very smart and well-intended. Dr. Paul won't open any eyes if he attacks Obama, personally. Lots of people voted for Obama because of his personality and an attack on him is an attack on them.

One can't educate people by putting them on the defensive.

IMissLiberty

Im sorry for you, screw those tyrants... I guess you don't really know what you have until you loose it. Glad to see there are ways to get around it though.

Ron Paul's Convention Speech

hiding behind their badge. Wannabees! I can abuse you because I can.
Screw them and their little boy agendas!