For the Grahmer police
I once knew an English professor who taught English and vocabulary at a university in California. The professor once told me that he taught his students to feel free to invent new words, if there wasn't something already "just right" for what they wanted to communicate. That's how language expands, and gives people the ability to more accurately convey their message to others. Subtleties of meaning also often require new words to communicate them properly.
I believe the same concept applies to the use of grammar and spelling. Rules of any kind shouldn't hamper the style or content of any communication, and if they do, we must make up new rules. While writing has certain grammatical rules that are meant to govern it, it is also an art, and if the impact or message can be enhanced by breaking these rules, they should be broken. Using fine art as an example, Van Gogh was criticized and rejected, because he didn't follow the "proper" rules or styles of painting. Yet most people now recognize that he conveyed feelings, and sometimes a message, that could have only been done by ignoring the rules, and expressing himself freely. I approach writing in a similar manner. I deliberately ignore convention, in favor of communicating with the reader in a way I feel is most effective. Much of this is because I want the writing to reflect "speaking" to you. This creates a more intimate communication, and also more accurately represents the thoughtful deliberateness of speech that is characteristic of many teachers.
Thus in my posts/comments you will find "odd" words/phrases/sentences, "odd" grammar and punctuation, and "odd" usage of all the above. It's not because I am illiterate or due to lack of professional editing. Some of the differences include (but are not limited to), extra commas (for instance, they may have been deliberately inserted to reflect an "enhanced" pause), hyphenated or strangely spelled words (to make something stand out, get you to think, or make a connection to another thought), These aren't extreme differences, and I believe it actually helps some readers transcend the limitations of left-brain thinking just a bit, and makes my writing even easier and more enjoyable to read.
So relax, take your shoes off, and enjoy the ride.




















a perfectly "legitimate" approach
And in this sense, by legitimate, I mean apt or fitting or efficacious.
In the interests of educating, enlightening, and inspiring, it is important to target your message. You probably don't want to tell your grandma or your young children that you suspect that America's future is fucked, though you may not hesitate to say so to your bowling buddies.
I confess I'm a bit of a spelling snob, but I try not to get too carried away. I recognize that there are often larger issues, but also know that poor presentation can often compromise the message. For me it's a balancing act. Whenever I'm speaking or writing, I'm aiming for clarity, brevity, and poetry, and frequently finding that those criteria at odds with each other.
Typically, those who best know the rules are the most successful at breaking them.
LXXI BC: Ego sum Spartacus // MDCCCLVII: I am Dred Scott // MCMVL: Ich bin Anne Frank // MMX: Je suis Assange // MMXI: Ik ben von NotHaus
Historically Speaking
It is always the poor who create language
and the rich who mandate it
www.Umake.it - The online resource for the Hand Made Society
Here's my only objection:
I am deeply into poetic license and freedom of expression but I also know that making a good impression on the public or strangers requires a fair degree of adherence to conventions other than the ideas you express. In fact, the more out-of-mainstream thinking your ideas are the more helpful it is to use conventional appearance and expression.
Because of the importance of our ideas I hate to see efforts to promulgate them be wasted because their advocates insist on looking or sounding too weird or uneducated for many to take seriously. Efforts to use good grammar, spelling, personal hygiene, and proper manners are therefore important to the success of our effort.
We are not automatons operating on a one-approach-for-all program. We should be able to shift gears between online chat and public relations efforts. It is a small sacrifice considering the importance of our mission.
New Hampshire and Ecuador
Yes, however...
The Daily Paul is not for noobs. The noobs can head for the Campaign for Liberty website. Too many tin foil hats here (self included)
Well,
I do remove my tin foil when I visit CFL ;-)
New Hampshire and Ecuador
Hee,hee
hee, thanks you made me feel better. Deserves a bump.
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
lol! that is "grammar"
I will read your post now!
Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.
Yes,
I originally titled my post "grammer" on purpose. I changed it to Grahmer so would be a little more obvious. Sorry if you thought I was a complete moron.
Grammar, yup
Time to fix the headline
Colchester, New London County, Connecticut
lol
that is my biggest laugh when someone is calling out spelling and spells something wrong... "grammar"
the best grahmer....
makes smores