Treason at the highest levels?

That ones that were regular joes ( the ones the key players tricked ), they lost they're lives, but not the key players, hell.. the key players lived out their lives, being taken care of by hundreds of slaves. It's just common sense, to realize that we came here to escape taxation, and some how without a vote or a signature of the rest of the regular colonists, we ended up with a document that gave a few centralized folks the absoliute power of taxation and law making. Doesn't that seem a little odd to you? Why would that happen? I mean the colonists were fighting the british, fighting, indians, fighting diseases, fighting harsh weather, why the hell would they need one more thing holding them down? Taxing them again! Why? If taxation is a force, how do we control them especially when they have the power to tax and no one else does! How many of you, actually believe that the King allowed the colonists to just escape, and not have a hand in it? This has been an on going CON people. The even tell you when they're conning you! CONstitution, CONgress, CON CON. Even if the states break away, you will still have a bunch of mini-mees. You will still be taxed, and regulated, because that is gubberments lifeblood, CONTROL, and they will still figure out how to unite for power. You have to remember that there is a top to this chain. We are ruled and owned by a bloodline, and it has alway's been that way.

It's still not good enough to know all these issues bearing in mind we are powerless. We know why we are powerless yet we still cannot reverse it.

And give back all of his ad revenue to 'the people'.

============================

Glenn Beck Supports NAFTA and taking your job:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/86643
Glen Beck -- RP Supporters are "Domestic Terrorists":
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/86000

It makes me irate that the media presents this information as if they are just finding out about it. We all know that every corporation is criminal but we are never going to change that fact....

"There can be only one permanent revolution - a moral one: The regeneration of the inner man."
—Tolstoy

There was quite the debate a few weeks back on this thread I started about who can enforce the constitution

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/87074

It's basically the people, they are the only one who can enforce the constitution by electing representatives who will truly uphold the constitution. Law enforcement officers and military swear a duty to uphold and defend the constitution, but these people have too much to loose potentially by trying to enforce it. They might be imprisoned or jailed by military tribunal or some other beaurocracy.

I've been pondering about Ron Paul or someone else putting up a bill in congress that would suspend any laws or bills passed that violate the constitution. These bills would be reviewed by the supreme court. Also, any bill passed or made by congress must also have the supreme court validate whether it violates any part or portion of the constitution or also any amendment thereof.

The supreme court would actually be doing their duty at that point by acting as another branch of government, with actual authority.

I think completely hi-jacking the supreme court too is a more difficult task in some ways than hi-jacking congress. The supreme court's duties are clearly defined as protectors of the constitution.

It basically boils down to this: people are fallable and can be corrupted, so basically anyone can be corrupt. We just need to start electing people with pro-constitutional track records who aren't criminals or sellouts to lobbyists.

-------------------------------------------------------
“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds” - Sam Adams

are those with the power...?