Gov Mark Sanford agrees with Gingrich: We should attack North Korea "pre-emptively"
1 min 30 sec into the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_JWBfh2ciE&#t=1m30s
Governor Sanford also refers to Mr Gingrich as his former boss who he defers to on issues of foreign policy
Sanford is Jesse Benton's choice for president. will he still remain to be advocated on the C4L website?
are you still living a pipe dream about Mark Sanford the bilderberg attendee?
my thoughts? Imagine if Sanford or Gingrich were president during the Cuban Missile Crisis?
My God
ps dont be too hard on Benton or C4L. they werent the only ones. Sanford served people well and he was telling conservatives what they wanted to hear. eventhoiugh im proud to say i wasnt fooled many good people were fooled including Ron Paul. Sanford said one thing to The American Conservative magazine where he denounces pre-emptive war and another thing to Fox news. He pulled a well orchestrated one
He also backtracked on rejecting the bailout according to this
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/88691
It was all a political grandstanding nothing else.
/
/
The Neo-Cons own the Republican Party
Sanford and Gingrich should answer a question. If North Korea is such a threat, why aren't the South Koreans interested in invading? If they're a threat to us, they would be a gigantic threat to others in the area.
One thing is for certain
North Koreans are leaving North Korea. They cross the border into China at certain underguarded places, and from there they request political asylum from South Korea. The South Korean government wants them, so it's usually granted. I know an American who lives in South Korea, speaks the language fluently and socializes with the natives, so I believe his information is accurate.
The Neo-Cons own the Republican Party
Sanford and Gingrich should answer a question. If North Korea is such a threat, why aren't the South Koreans interested in invading? If they're a threat to us, they would be a gigantic threat to others in the area.
Typical Chicken Hawk Politicians
Maybe Sanford and Gingrich will volunteer to parachute in. You want to lead? You lead from the front.
HE SHOULD ARGUE AGAINST US AID to North Korea...not for war.
As Ron Paul stated on a video on this site a couple weeks ago, we give North Korea all kinds of money and we have funded their nuclear program.
I believe it is the Federal Reserve angling for a war wherein they can profit again.
Here is a link showing how much we give to North Korea, so I can back up my statement with facts...
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21834.pdf
"We have allowed our nation to be over-taxed, over-regulated, and overrun by bureaucrats. The founders would be ashamed of us for what we are putting up with."
-Ron Paul
What a pair they make. I just hope the Sheeple can see what`s
in for us if they come to power.
"Since 1789 the only government on Earth that has the power to crush the American people`s liberties across the board is the government of the United States"
Robert Higgs
A terrific way to start a world war...
North Korea is a client state of China and in close proximity to Russia.
A non-nuclear pre-emptive strike on North Korea will result in North Korea using its thousands of launch tubes to decimation of Seol and annihilate tens of thousands of US troops at or near the DMZ. A nuclear pre-emptive strike on North Korea would result in fallout landing on China and Russia. China would almost definitely retaliate, and Russia, smarting from our cozy relationship with Georgia, probably would. As we all should know, both have nuclear-tipped missiles targeted at us.
And the GOP establishment called Goldwater "an extremist".
The Invention of Hitler
Preemptive war is the invention of Hitler, and the fantasy of George W. Bush.
All I can say is
that I hope that we do. Then I hope that Kim Jong has capabilities that we don't know about and kicks our ass.
But there is no way that North Korea could fight us is there?
http://www.rense.com/general37/nkorr.htm
Was hoping he would not be total foreign policy neocon
He was in congress a long time and knows lots of people, being buddies w/ Neocon Newt.
A pre-emptive strike against N. Korea? That's insane.
-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity should be our motto as Americans. Keep the American dream alive no matter how dark or difficult our circumstances seem.
Ron Paul is my President.
------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Not War, Welfare and Bankruptcy.
------------
Foreign policy
is where you can tell who the neocons really are.
Sanford is in the CFR
and Bilderberg...he is not to be trusted.
I posted nearly a year ago about Mark Sanford
Did he get endorsed by Ron Paul?
I told you guys we must do our own due diligence -- ON EVERYONE
Now -- Go look into Adam Kokesh (due diligence -- Not a witch hunt)
He is less proven than Sanford.
Octobox
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality
Less proven that Sanford?
Seriously? Kokesh seems at least to be a libertarian. Sanford, meanwhile, is a just another one of those conservatives trying to pass themselves off as libertarians.
Sanford has "voted" -- We can trace his policies - his decisions
"proven" does not mean "on our side" -- it means tested.
Adam is completely un-tested -- his new videos show a completely different personality -- mode of dress -- et al.
The reasons why I would elect him (if I had a choice or even "if" I would) are disapearing. The only reason I'd hire him is to be a lion -- this pussy cat in pinstripes looks like another suit to me.
I'm not saying I wont "eventually" endorse him -- I'm just saying tough talking at some ralies does not make for a voting record I can trace or anything really.
I wouldn't elect anyone on DP who ran for office -- I don't know them; I don't care if they've agreed with every single post I've made.
I'm a fierce individualist and this is my point -- As individuals NEVER take an endorsement -- DIG - RESEARCH - DIG - RESEARCH.
Make them earn it.
Octobox
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality
Why not take an endorsement?
If you were an ice carver, you may be in a career that is isolated, as you work for and by yourself, but you are only as good as the jobs you get.
Would you turn down a 40 block contract of an ice bar for a corporation / 5 star hotel because a client gave you an endorsement to a corporation who can afford to pay you 10K?
Maybe calling it networking doesn't sound like an endorcement, but it is, because a good word, is a good thing, Doncha think?
WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
Granger: I see your point -- It's not contrarian to my point
So - we are in agreence in theory.
However, we are not talking about free-market society where one is 100% dependent on endorsement and the result of that endorse is reflected (profit driven) by 100% market forces.
What we are talking about is Gov't Job -- Gov't Salary and Gov't Budget.
It's "my money" and it's taken.
We have not won one-single battle in 40 years -- because the number of people who "get it" in Congress and are "proven" is 1 (Ron Paul).
Even Ron said if we had enough people in Congress to turn the tied (whatever the break even on that is) it wouldn't matter because the masses need to rid themselves of welfarist notions (notions of collectivism -- i.e., "1 bad cop = 900,000 bad cops" or "police state").
This is why I seek to education and create temporary unions where it counts -- with consumers. Voting is important and simple: "vote-out-the-incumbent" -- that destroys lobbying). However, without the daily-dollar-vote -- it's all the definition of insanity (Einstein's version).
Octobox
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality
Proven vs. on our side
OK, i gotcha. I see what you meant. ;)
I dont like Sanford
to me hes a milly- mouth and a half hearted libertarian that supports neo-cons like gingrich and mccain who then will turn around and stab you in the back. i dont think he belongs in this movement..
It looks like
they won't be happy until we have yet another war. Ugh!
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
Once the Federal Reserve
Once the Federal Reserve goes out of business, it's going to be very difficult for our politicians to pay for wars without a printing press.
That's the only hope we have to stopping our crazy politicians from invading other countries.
Once the Fed goes away, our wars will end.
Excellent observation
The international bankers are responsible for financing all the barbaric wars of the last two centuries.
Newt Is Very Dangerous and Scary
and Mark Sanford - backs him up .... Mark Sanford is for pre-emptive strikes .... he is not fit to run for prez .... just like Jeb or Newt ...
(or anyone else with such names)
Governor Mark Sanford Confronted on Bilderberg Attendance
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&frie...
This was one of the most
This was one of the most honest and genuine interviews I've ever seen where the interviewer was not "mainstream."
That said, he follows Newt blindly and I lose all respect for him.
He Might Be OK As Governor, But That's Where He Needs To Stay
Cross another one off the list, not that I'm terribly surprised.
____________________________________________
"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." -- Joseph Goebbels
_____________________________
"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it." -- Joseph Goebbels
I agree with this quote:
"I'm fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in." George McGovern
Hmmmmm. I don't know how to feel about this.
You see, I live in SC, and I am immensely proud of Gov. Sanford for his stance against taking the stimulus money that is being "offered" to our state. He says that it will create a situation where, when the money is gone, we will find ourselves unable to financially keep in place the very programs that will come about with this money. The fact that Rep. Clyburn (D) is so vehemently opposed to Sanford's stance tells me that he (Sanford) is probably right. There has been alot of talk about Sanford as a possible presidential candidate for 2012. I am not sure exactly what role the Republican party has given to Gingrich, but it looks to me like he has been tasked with taking Sanford "under his wing". Just when i was really starting to like Sanford. I will hold off on an opinion until I have an opportunity to weigh in on future comments made by Sanford.
~Your perception becomes your reality~
~Your perception becomes your reality~
food for thought
anyone asscociating with a newt .... should not be trusted.
anyone in favor of pre-emptive war is a warmonger.
Are there any Dems or Reps that are Truly Non - Interventionist ?
option - vote third party