| |
  
|
||||||||||
SGT Lagasse and SGT Brooks Destroy the Official 9/11 Story
Submitted by declarationofre... on Fri, 04/10/2009 - 14:21
These two independent accounts from Pentagon police officers of the plane being on the north side of the CITGO station blow the official story out of the water. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elKov_UZDQE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2... » |
|
|||||||||
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
And listen to Michael Ruppert
CIA, Drugs, Wall Street & 9-11
http://www.archive.org/details/MichaelC.RuppertIntroduction
Question.
How did the interviewer (whoever he is) managed to get 2 cops to answer questions about the Pentagon?
I'm not that smart, but I honestly have no idea what those cops are talking about. They mention, only, a plane headed toward the Pentagon. How does that discredit the official story?
Because for the plane to have
hit the light poles and caused the directional damage to the Pentagon it had to fly where the government-supplied alleged FDR data says it flew in the final seconds, which is SOUTH of the Citgo Station.
These officers were at the station and they are 100% sure that it flew north.
Witness after witness has since been located and interviewed on location and everyone who could see the plane in relation to the station say the same thing from multiple excellent vantage points, and they're all 100% sure of it.
Read these and look at the drawings:
http://thepentacon.com/Topic1.htm
http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic11.htm
And watch the full video and many others here:
http://www.thepentacon.com
This is why the damage to the Pentagon was so dubious all along and why the FBI has refused to release the tapes. There WAS a plane, there was NOT a missile, but the plane flew NORTH of Citgo and did not hit the building.
The cops talked to them because they thought they were SUPPORTING the official story. They didn't realize that the plane would have had to be south of the station in order to have hit the light poles and building, and they didn't know that the government had released phony "blackbox" data that alleged that it was on the south side.
However, they now understand this after seeing the documentaries that these interviews were featured in, and Sgt Brooks has called it "an eye opener" and said that "anything is possible" in terms of him being fooled. Lagasse admits that he flinched when he saw the plane so likely did not see what happened when it got to the building. Both are still 100% insistent that the plane flew on the north side of the station, even now that they understand the implications.
Read my lips..."Penatgon's missile defense system"
Citgo station did not have a missile defense system.
Pentagon did....none of the great warriors of 9/11 truth have ever chased the only useful fact of that day...ever....none of them...the missile defense system could have blown that plane to smithereens two dozen times and everyone at the Pentagon KNOWS IT.
It is there and a hundred or so military officers have banded together to bring it out.
Have a nice day Citgo station! I hope you sell a lot unleaded.
Lose the Citgo station.
The missile defense system is what we want to talk about...not "some guy" who "said" he saw the plane fly by.
Why didn't they shoot the damn missiles and more importantly...why the F doesn't anyone talk about it? Because the 9/11 dance is run by the men in power.....?
No that couldn't be it.
Unify
As I told you
in this thread, it's not just "some guy" allegedly saying something. It's guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy after guy. Literally. Pentagon Police Officers, people at the Pentagon, ANC workers, gas station employees, auto mechanics... from the five most perfect and critical vantage points they all the same SAME THING and they are all100% certain about it... the plane flew north of Citgo, which PROVES that it didn't hit the light pole or the building.
It's not about the Citgo station, it's about the flight path which 100% contradicts the physical damage and the government-supplied alleged FDR data.
In addition, one eyewitness saw the plane FLYING AWAY SECONDS AFTER THE EXPLOSION.
Another witness right across the street from the Pentagon saw the plane "pull up" at the last second.
NO ONE saw the plane hit a light pole.
The cab driver -- whose car was allegedly hit by one of the poles and whose story is blatantly physically impossible -- has had to resort to trying to claim he was ON THE NORTH SIDE even though there was many photos proving exactly where his cab was, and despite the fact that EVEN IF he was on the north side that would also PROVE that the plane didn't hit. Also NO ONE saw a light pole in his cab. NO ONE.
This is THE smoking gun of 9/11. I don't know if you still haven't watched the interviews or if you're purposely trying to spread false information or what, but you don't know what you're talking about.
Amazing isn't it! "When
Amazing isn't it!
"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny."
-Thomas Jefferson
I am more concerned about the return of my money than the return on my money. --Mark Twain
“A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Prov. 22:3; 27:12 KJV)
Hey McCain-----┌П┐(◣_◢)┌П┐
bump
because Im tired of being looked at like Im a nutjob
when I can understand 8th grade science class
I wonder
if Lloyd England, on whose testimony this other video is focused, was given a manufactured memory following (or even before) the actual damage was done to his cab. (video: http://thepentacon.com/eyeofthestorm.htm)
If the plane didn't hit, what happened to it and what *did* hit the pentagon? Could the plane have been a giant hologram as some have suggested the WTC planes were? Could the actual damage have been done by a cruise missile that *did* come in at the "official" angle? Is that the light-colored, ground-hugging blur we see in the security camera frame the instant before impact? (In my view the small entry hole and lack of any evidence of wings and engines hitting the exterior of the Pentagon are more characteristic of a missile than a plane.)Was the plane just a diversion so the cruise missile wouldn't be noticed? Was the official version constructed around the path of the cruise missile?
No, I'm not a believer, just curious and open minded. The idea of our own government implementing some enormous, diabolical plot is not that strange. It certainly sells well as fiction and the reason it does is that it feeds off our already healthy suspicion of government's hidden agendas.
New Hampshire and Ecuador
Explosives
Have you seen April Gallup's account? She was a Pentagon employee that was in the building on that day; listen carefully to what she experienced. Did you also know that the exact section of the Pentagon that was destroyed was the accounting department which had just lost 2.3 TRILLION dollars which has still never been found?
"There can be only one permanent revolution - a moral one: The regeneration of the inner man."
—Tolstoy
"The body is but a vessel for the soul,
A puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny.
And lo, the body is not eternal,
For it must feed on the flesh of others,
Lest it return to the dust whence it came.
Therefore the soul deceives and despises."
Thanks for April Gallup link.
I found her absolutely impressive.
New Hampshire and Ecuador
Definitely
She also was visited in the hospital late that night/early the next morning by unidentified individuals (including one Navy one Army) who didn't ask her how she was or anything, just asked "what do you think you happened?" and she told them she thought a bomb had gone off, and they said "no, THIS is what happened" and gave her the official story, and then left.
She starts telling the story here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EcpiPL6kw4#t=9m15s
And continues here after the commercial break:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZO9k3Y4H-s#t=1m03s
Here April Gallop endorses The Pentacon (the video that the clip in the OP of this thread is from)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nUato7U5JY
Some have speculated that about Lloyde England
But there is no evidence that he was somehow mind-controlled, and he has been caught lying multiple times. For example, if you watch Eye of the Storm, you'll see that early on in the conversation he lets it slip that his neighbor, who photographed his car from close range, was "up on the bridge". Then later he tries to deny that he was anywhere near the bridge, even though there is abundant photographic evidence proving his location. So he definitely knows what really happened.
Also, if you listen to his candid comments in the car from the same video, and transcribed in the article I posted here, he makes it quite clear that he knew it was a staged event.
There's no independent verifiable evidence that ANYTHING hit the Pentagon. The evidence proves that the plane did not hit, and there is not a single independently verified eyewitness who claims to have seen a missile. The missile theory really took off after Rumsfeld "accidentally" said it was a missile. However, now that we have conclusive evidence of the true flight path of the plane -- the REAL smoking gun that proves that the Pentagon attack was a military black op -- it is obvious that this "slip" was a calculated move to send researchers in the wrong direction, only to be discredited eventually.
The plane was not a hologram. It flew extremely low, right past these people. They could hear it and some could even feel the heat. Any baseless speculation about holograms and missiles distracts from the indisputable proof that the plane did not hit the building and thus 9/11 was a false flag military black op.
Then my question of what happened to the plane
becomes all the more important, to me at least. If an airliner soared just meters over the Pentagon, wouldn't heads have turned from many directions following the explosion, increasing the odds of someone seeing and reporting a very low jetliner in a steep climb away from the blast? Are there any such reports? Is there a "rest of the story" out there I haven't noticed? (I really have done little reading except on DP and I don't read everything that shows up here.)
It makes no sense that the plane would be flown off and destroyed along with its passengers, otherwise why not crash it into the Pentagon in the first place, avoiding the necessity of a cover-up? Was it the Pentagon flight that author Barbara Olsen was supposedly on? Is she living in Chile with a surgically altered appearance and a billion in hush money along with the rest of the passengers?
Hope to hear more...
New Hampshire and Ecuador
I think
they did not crash the plane into the Pentagon because they wouldn't be able to control HOW MUCH damage was done. With a pre-planted bomb, they pretty much can estimate what gets damaged and what doesn't.
Flyover
One major thing that you need to understand is that the Pentagon is in Arlington VA, a mile from Reagan National Airport, and there are large commercial airliners flying extremely low over the area every 2-3 minutes all day every day. It is not in the restricted airspace in D.C. Planes making a steep ascent over the Potomac river is an extremely common site.
Besidse that, multiple proven-fraudulent media reports about a "second plane" that allegedly "shadowed" the attack jet were put out immediately following the attack. That way anyone who did see it and did think it was suspicious would just assume that it was the "second plane". (There was a real second plane, but it was a C-130 cargo jet, and eyewitness accounts, photographs, video, and even the pilot himself prove that it didn't arrive until minutes later).
This is what happened with Roosevelt Roberts, Jr., who was working in the Pentagon on 9/11. He was about seven steps inside a loading dock when he heard and felt the explosion of the alleged impact. He immediately ran outside (took a matter of seconds), looked up, and saw a large commerical airliner flying away from the scene. However, he bought the propaganda and assumed it was this mysterious "second plane' that never really existed. There was only one plane. It was THE plane that he saw. His first-hand account can be heard in this video.
Undoubtedly there are others like him (Dewitt Roseborough is probably one of them, for example), but they are hard to locate. Also, witnesses are usually only willing to talk BEFORE they understand the implications of what they saw. None of the witnesses have come out and said they've been misquoted in their accounts which prove that the plane flew over the building, but they get scared and shut up once they understand. Roosevelt is a prime example.
As for why they did what they did I don't know; you'll have to identify the planners and ask them. But the evidence conclusively that the plane flew north of the Citgo gas station and therefore did not hit the building. If I were to speculate I would say that it was so that they could assure complete control over the damage and make sure that no top Pentagon brass were taken out.
As for what happened to Barbara Olson and the other passengers: Same answer. We will likely never know unless there is a real investigation. The evidence proves that they did not die on Flight 77 as it hit the Pentagon because that never happened. (There is no evidence that the flyover jet was Flight 77 anyway for that matter, and substantial evidence that it was not.)
I recommend just taking the time to watch the videos on http://www.thepentacon.com yourself when you get a chance. It takes time, but it's well worth it. This is extremely important stuff.
Watched 'em.
Thanks.
New Hampshire and Ecuador
You're welcome
Thank you for watching them.
The reason not
to crash it into the Pentagon is because of the difficulty of that mission. The reason to vaporize it over the ocean, is obviously to cover the story that it went into the Pentagon. The way they did it was more certain. There was a certain position in the Pentagon that they wanted to blow up and they did not want a chance of missing. The plane and passengers would be sacrificed one way or the other.
A Must-Watch
You can see the full video and others here:
http://thepentacon.com/videoshorts.htm
These clips are taken from The Pentacon: Smoking Gun Version.
All of the eyewitnesses in a position to tell (including these two officers) definitively place the place NORTH of the former Citgo gas station, proving it couldn't have hit the building.
See this thread too for more info:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/89351
Where`s the plane?
I agree there was no noticable reckage of #77 at the Pentagon. But where did the plane and passengers go? If they deverted upwards prior to contact with the pentagon someone else should have seen or heard where #77 went. It`s difficult to miss something that low,large and noisy.
Who said
it had to be flight 77? Could have been a smaller plane painted like an AA plane. The passengers?? I would guess executed.
And that it didn't knock down the light poles
"There can be only one permanent revolution - a moral one: The regeneration of the inner man."
—Tolstoy
"The body is but a vessel for the soul,
A puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny.
And lo, the body is not eternal,
For it must feed on the flesh of others,
Lest it return to the dust whence it came.
Therefore the soul deceives and despises."
Right
That is a critical point as well and even more obvious.
Bump
to keep the shredding of the official story going. :)
I just
can't believe the amount of people that still won't even admit some things are not right. I guess they are just scared.