"HE IS RISEN"
"HE IS RISEN"
By Chuck Baldwin
April 7, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
As we approach Resurrection Sunday, it behooves us to remind ourselves (Christians should need no reminder) of the significance of this season. Along with the virgin birth, the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ form the cornerstone of the Christian faith. Indeed, the resurrection of Jesus separates Christianity from all the world's religions.
Furthermore, the overwhelming number of America's founders understood the connection between the Christian faith and the rise of these United States. John Quincy Adams said, "The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: it connected, in one indissoluble bond, the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity."
Adams also said, "From the day of the Declaration . . . They [the American people] were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of the Gospel, which they nearly all, acknowledged as the rules of their conduct."
Then, on July 4, 1837, Adams said these words, "Why is it that, next to the birthday of the Savior of the World, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day? . . . Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birthday of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birthday of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of Independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer's mission upon earth? That it laid the corner stone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity, and gave to the world the first irrevocable pledge of the fulfillment of the prophecies, announced directly from Heaven at the birth of the Savior and predicted by the greatest of the Hebrew prophets six hundred years before?"
Daniel Webster also acknowledged the relationship between our founders' Christian faith and America's creation. He said, "Finally, let us not forget the religious character of our origin. Our fathers were brought hither by their high veneration for the Christian religion. They journeyed by its light, and labored in its hope. They sought to incorporate its principles with the elements of their society, and to diffuse its influence through all their institutions, civil, political, or literary."
Advertisement
Noah Webster, the man who is called the Father of American Education, said, "Education is useless without the Bible." He also said, "The Bible was America's basic textbook in all fields."
Noah Webster went on to say, "In my view, the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government, ought to be instructed. . . . No truth is more evident to my mind, than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people."
One more quotation from Noah Webster is necessary at this point. He said, "The religion which has introduced civil liberty, is the religion of Christ and his apostles, which enjoins humility, piety, and benevolence; which acknowledges in every person a brother, or a sister, and a citizen with equal rights. This is genuine Christianity, and to this we owe our free constitutions of government."
These sentiments were the sentiments of America from the inception of our great country. Remember, the voyagers of the Mayflower made a covenant between themselves and Almighty God. It is called the Mayflower Compact, and in it they said the reason they had made the voyage and determined to plant a colony in the new world was "for the glory of God, and advancement of the Christian faith."
It was only in the last half of the 20th Century that America began trying to distance itself from its Christian heritage. Yet today, educators, entertainers, chief executives, and politicians are in the process of supplanting our Christian heritage with the pseudo-religions of secularism, multiculturalism, and universalism.
What many people do not understand is that when America abandons its dependence upon the God of the Bible, it will--at the same time--surrender the very foundation of our liberty and independence. As Thomas Jefferson said, "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath?"
Patrick Henry agreed with Jefferson. He said, "It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains."
As we celebrate the vicarious death and victorious resurrection of Jesus Christ, let us remember the importance of preserving liberty within these United States of America. And this commitment involves much more than attending church once a week or repeating an occasional catechism. It means we must seek to incorporate the principles of liberty and independence into the very fabric of our lives and work. It means we will offer eternal vigilance to the fundamental principles upon which America was built. Liberty has no guarantees or assurances. Each generation must work to preserve, protect, and defend the principles of constitutional government, or else liberty will be lost.
The angel spoke of Christ, declaring, "He is risen." And so He is. And because Christ lives, liberty and freedom may also live. Why? Because "where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty."
HAPPY EASTER!
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.
© 2009 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved
Another great Patrick Henry quote
.
My family doesn't celebrate Easter
"It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains."
Sadly enough, Protestants have strayed very far from their origins and taken all the Roman Catholic holidays for their own. It wasn't very long ago that Easter was considered a pagan holiday.
And all regular churches that are 501(c)3 are controlled by the government and have agreed to be powerless in influencing that government. So where is our hope?
I still consider it a pagan
I still consider it a pagan holiday.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
Yes, He is risen, but...
Yes, He is risen, but He did not rise on Easter! Easter has nothing to do with the resurrection of Christ except as misinformed and deceived religionists have bought into the lie.
Acts 12:1-4 proves it (with the help of Exodus 12).
Acts 12:1 "Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church."
2 "And he killed James the brother of John with the sword."
3 "And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.)"
4 "And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people."
This is the only time the word Easter appears in the Bible. It is being observed by a pagan (Roman) king. The Romans believed in many gods, Venus being one of their favorites. Use an encyclopedia and look up Venus, Aphrodite, Ishtar, Ashtoreth, Milcom, Adonis, Cupid, Isis, Horus, and Astarte, and you'll find a connection between the gods of the Babylonians, Moabites, Ammonites, Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Phoenicians, etc. They all believed in a female god who had a son who was considered divine. These religions existed prior to the birth of Christ, yet they are a perversion of Christ.
You may ask how can they be a perversion of something that had not occurred yet? Simple the birth of Christ was foretold more millenia before His birth by prophets and leaders from Adam on down. So those who misunderstood the prophesies (easily done) became purveyors of faulty stories with similar themes. But I'm getting sidetracked...
To get to the point, Herod was definitely NOT celebrating the resurrection of Christ when he decided to wait until AFTER Easter to have him killed like he killed James.
Since Peter was imprisoned DURING THE DAYS OF UNLEAVENED BREAD (verse 3) We know that the Passover was already past because the passover was on April 14, while the days of unleavened bread occurred from April 14-21, lasting seven days. The days of unleavened bread were ongoing, in which the Jews celebrated the Passover, in honour of God delivering them out of the bondage of Egypt.
For the Passover, the Hebrews were required to sacrifice a male lamb with out spot or blemish and sprinkle its blood over thier doorposts. Failure to do so resulted in death of the firstborn.
When John the Baptist was preaching one day, he saw Jesus and said, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29)
Jesus was God in flesh and He came to take on Himself the blame for the sins of the world and to pay what justice demands - death and burning (as the sacrifices of the Old Testament pictured). Since God cannot die. He took on the form of man so that form could be put to death, therby paying the penalty for all of us.
So Jesus was crucified on Passover Day, as the real Passover Lamb of God. )BTW, all who obey God and trust His command and believe in jesus Christ as their Saviour are passed over in judgment and are delivered from the bondage of sin's penalty.
So, if Jesus was crusified on Passover day and the dyas of unlevened bread were already going on, Herod was not waiting for the anniversary of the resurrection of Jesus Christ because it ocuured on April 17. Easter in those days occurred after the seven days of unleavened bread, toward the end of April.
Therefore, Easter has nothing to do with the Resurredtion of Christ. The reason a connection has been made is because of the success of the early diciples and the spreading of the gospel of Jesus Christ. The pagans saw the connection between the story of Mary and Jesus to their pagan gods 9which were a perversion of the prophesies of Christ) and they blended the stories and they changed the names of their gods to Mary and Jesus without changing their characters too much exept when necessary to deceive gullible weak "Christians".
Then they changed the observance of Easter from a fixed date to a floating date to keep in tune with the insistence of "Christians" that Jesus rose on Sunday. Which is why Easter today has a floating date, but Christmas, another pagan holiday has a fixed date, there not being ant reference in the Bible as to what day Jesus was born like there is for the day of His resurrection.
The deception continues, which is why Jesus said to the woman at the well in John 4:22, "Ye worship ye know not what." That is true for many, many "Christians" today. It is the unscriptural blending of paganism with "Christianity" which results in flawed religious dogma which is persecutorial, arrogant and turns so many free-thinking independent-minded people away from the truth.
This is why I attend an "independent of the independent, Baptist Church in Phoenix. They are so rare. It is not a 501 (C)3 or incorporated "church", but a true Biblical one.
Hope you can find one in your area, but chances are slim. If I can help you find one, contact me.
Kool-Aid Alert
Sorry, but if a religion existed prior to another, the perversion exists in the latter, not the former. If you'd get off your Kool-Aid for a moment you'd realize that the prophecies you refer to also are predated by the religions you cite, and the cyclical nature of religious prophecies not only indicate that those Pre-Christian religions had the same ones (that Christians co-opted for their own agenda), butt hat ti will happen again in the future.
FAIL.
You're SO right.
But Ishtar does get the people into church to cough up a little more money....just like at Xmas time.
If there was a command in the Scripture that we were to observe Christ's resurrection you can better believe NO ONE would do it.
Having said that.....you'll be able to get chocolate cheap at Walmart since that stupid pagan holiday is over with.
You're on the right track but
if you do a little further study you will find that in this verse Easter is a mistranslation of Passover. Check your concordance. Herod was not ignorant of the Jewish festivals and was doing this to appease the Pharisaical Jews. Thus he would wait until after the Passover. But as far as the pagan origins of Easter you are very correct as it was introduced into christian worship along with pagan Sunday sabbath (sun worship) and Christmas (Saturnalia) by Constantine after he set himself up as leader of the "church" around 300ad.
No.
Ishtar was exaclty what the heathen Herod was going to observe and not the passover. They were and are 2 different observances and Herod was only going to be part of Ishtar.
The verse in question isn't a mistranslation.
Mistranslation
English Word: Easter
Usage Number: 1
Strong's Number: 3957
Greek Word: pascha
Usage Notes: mistranslated "Easter" in Acts 12:4, AV, denotes the Passover (RV). The phrase "after the Passover" signifies after the whole festival was at an end. The term "Easter" is not of Christian origin. It is another form of Astarte, one of the titles of the Chaldean goddess, the queen of heaven. The festival of Pasch held by Christians in post-apostolic times was a continuation of the Jewish feast, but was not instituted by Christ, nor was it connected with Lent. From this Pasch the pagan festival of "Easter" was quite distinct and was introduced into the apostate Western religion, as part of the attempt to adapt pagan festivals to Christianity. See PASSOVER
Passover 28, Easter 1
Also notice meaning #4 at the bottom.
Strong's Greek Number 3957
Greek word: pascha {pas'-khah}
Root: of Aramaic origin cf 6453
Cross Reference: TDNT - 5:896,797
Part of Speech: n n
Vine's Word(s): Easter, Passover
Usage Notes:
KJV - Passover 28
- Easter 1 [Total Count: 29]
1) the paschal sacrifice (which was accustomed to be offered for the people's deliverance of old from Egypt)
2) the paschal lamb, i.e. the lamb the Israelites were accustomed to slay and eat on the fourteenth day of the month of Nisan (the first month of their year) in memory of the day on which their fathers, preparing to depart from Egypt, were bidden by God to slay and eat a lamb, and to sprinkle their door posts with its blood, that the destroying angel, seeing the blood, might pass over their dwellings; Christ crucified is likened to the slain paschal lamb
3) the paschal supper
4) the paschal feast, the feast of the Passover, extending from the
14th to the 20th day of the month Nisan
Easter is a Pagan holiday of the Sadducees & Pharisees....n|t
*
I don't understand
SimplemindedSam. Your statement makes no sense and sounds ignorant. Perhaps you would like to elaborate.
He has risen indeed...
-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity should be our motto as Americans. Keep the American dream alive no matter how dark or difficult our circumstances seem.
Ron Paul is my President.
------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Not War, Welfare and Bankruptcy.
------------
friends whom I esteem
AN ANSWER TO A FRIEND
PARIS, May 12, 1797
IN your letter of the 20th of March, you give me several quotations from the Bible, which you call the 'word of God,' to shew me that my opinions on religion are wrong, and I could give you as many, from the same book to shew that yours are not right; consequently, then, the Bible decides nothing, because it decides any way, and every way, one chooses to make it.
But by what authority do you call the Bible the 'word of God?' for this is the first point to be settled. It is not your calling it so that makes it so, any more than the Mahometans calling the Koran the 'word of God' makes the Koran to be so. The Popish Councils of Nice and Laodicea, about 350 years after the time the person called Jesus Christ is said to have lived, voted the books that now compose what is called the New Testament to be the 'word of God.' This was done by yeas and nays, as we now vote a law. The pharisees of the second Temple, after the Jews returned from captivity in Babylon, did the same by the books that now compose the Old Testament, and this is all the authority there is, which to me is no authority at all. I am as capable of judging for myself as they were, and I think more so, because, as they made a living by their religion, they had a self-interest in the vote they gave.
You may have an opinion that a man is inspired, but you cannot prove it, nor can you have any proof of it yourself, because you cannot see into his mind in order to know how he comes by his thoughts; and the same is the case with the word 'revelation.' There can be no evidence of such a thing, for you can no more prove revelation than you can prove what another man dreams of, neither can he prove it himself.
It is often said in the Bible that God spake unto Moses, but how do you know that God spake unto Moses? Because, you will say, the Bible says so. The Koran says, that God spake unto Mahomet, do you believe that too? No. Why not? Because, you will say, you do not believe it; and so because you do, and because you don't is all the reason you can give for believing or disbelieving except that you will say that Mahomet was an impostor. And how do you know Moses was not an imposter? For my own part, I believe that all are impostors who pretend to hold verbal communication with the Deity. It is the way by which the world has been imposed upon; but if you think otherwise you have the same right to your opinion that I have to mine, and must answer for it in the same manner. But all this does not settle the point, whether the Bible be the 'word of God,' or not. It is therefore necessary to go a step further. The case then is: --
You form your opinion of God from the account given of him in the Bible; and I form my opinion of the Bible from the wisdom and goodness of God manifested in the structure of the universe, and in all works of Creation. The result in these two cases will be, that you, by taking the Bible for your standard, will have a bad opinion of God; and I, by taking God for my standard, shall have a bad opinion of the Bible.
The Bible represents God to be a changeable, passionate, vindictive Being; making a world and then drowning it, afterwards repenting of what he had done, and promising not to do so again. Setting one nation to cut the throats of another, and stopping the course of the sun till the butchery should be done. But the works of God in the Creation preach to us another doctrine. In that vast volume we see nothing to give us the idea of a changeable, passionate, vindictive God; everything we there behold impresses us with a contrary idea, -- that of unchangeableness and of eternal order, harmony, and goodness. The sun and the seasons return at their appointed time, and everything in the Creation proclaims that God is unchangeable. Now, which am I to believe, a book that any impostor might make and call the 'word of God,' or the Creation itself which none but an Almighty Power could make? For the Bible says one thing, and the Creation says the contrary. The Bible represents God with all the passions of a mortal, and the Creation proclaims him with all the attributes of a God.
It is from the Bible that man has learned cruelty, rapine, and murder; for the belief of a cruel God makes a cruel man. That bloodthirsty man, called the prophet Samuel, makes God to say, (i Sam. xv. 3,) "Now go and smite Amaleck, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not, but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass."
That Samuel or some other impostor might say this, is what, at this distance of time, can neither be proved nor disproved, but in my opinion it is blasphemy to say, or to believe, that God said it. All our ideas of the justice and goodness of God revolt at the impious cruelty of the Bible. It is not a God, just and good, but a devil, under the name of God, that the Bible describes.
What makes this pretended order to destroy the Amalekites appear the worse, is the reason given for it. The Amalekites, four hundred years before, according to the account in Exodus xvii. (but which has the appearance of fable from the magical account it gives of Moses holding up his hands,) had opposed the Israelites coming into their country, and this the Amalckites had a right to do, because the Israelites were the invaders, as the Spaniards were the invaders of Mexico; and this opposition by the Amalekites, at that time, is given as a reason, that the men, women, infants and sucklings, sheep and oxen, camels and asses, that were born four hundred years afterwards, should be put to death; and to complete the horror, Samuel hewed Agag, the chief of the Amalekites, in pieces, as you would hew a stick of wood. I will bestow a few observations on this case.
In the first place, nobody knows who the author, or writer, of the book of Samuel was, and, therefore, the fact itself has no other proof than anonymous or hearsay evidence, which is no evidence at all. In the second place, this anonymous book says, that this slaughter was done by 'the express command of God:' but all our ideas of the justice and goodness of God give the lie to the book, and as I never will believe any book that ascribes cruelty and injustice to God, I therefore reject the Bible as unworthy of credit.
As I have now given you my reasons for believing that the Bible is not the word of God, that it is a falsehood, I have a right to ask you your reasons for believing the contrary; but I know you can give me none, except that you were educated to believe the Bible; and as the Turks give the same reason for believing the Koran, it is evident that education makes all the difference, and that reason and truth have nothing to do in the case. You believe in the Bible from the accident of birth, and the Turks believe in the Koran from the same accident, and each calls the other 'infidel.' But leaving the prejudice of education out of the case, the unprejudiced truth is, that all are infidels who believe falsely of God, whether they draw their creed from the Bible, or from the Koran, from the Old Testament, or from the New.
When you have examined the Bible with the attention that I have done, (for I do not think you know much about it,) and permit yourself to have just ideas of God, you will most probably believe as I do. But I wish you to know that this answer to your letter is not written for the purpose of changing your opinion. It is written to satisfy you, and some other friends whom I esteem, that my disbelief of the Bible is founded on a pure and religious belief in God; for in my opinion the Bible is a gross libel against the justice and goodness of God, in almost every part of it.
THOMAS PAINE.
---------------
“A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement” - Thomas Jefferson
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with.” Ron Paul
Very good find MMJ!
very interesting read!
i think i got it from a fellow dailypauler
---------------
“A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement” - Thomas Jefferson
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with.” Ron Paul
Bump
the Victor!
Happy Easter - ENGLISH: Christ is risen! He is risen indeed!-FRENCH: Christ est ressuscité! Il est vraiment ressuscité!-ARABIC: Al'Masiah qam! Haqqan Qam!-FARSI: Issah Ghi-yam kard! dar vagheh ou barkhasteh ast!-RUSSIAN: Христос воскрес!! Jristos Voscres!-ITALIAN: Cristo e’ Risorto! Veramente e’ Risorto!-ARMENIAN: Christos haryav i mérélotz! orhnyal é haroutiounen Christossi! GREEK: Christos Enestes!
for liberty!
Whether or not...
you can attribute these quotes correctly, the fact of the matter is that atheism MUST lead to tyranny. If there is no source of truth higher than ourselves, if there is no being who has the power and authority to set the standard for how we are to live our lives, then we are forced to accept whatever truth is marketed to us most persuasively. Atheism must lead to an elite ruling class. There is no way around it, you can't be an atheist and pro-liberty, you can only be a rebel, that is until you're in charge, then you can be the tyrant.
This is a ridiculous statement
and that's coming from a person of faith.
And atheist can, and often does, believe in personal liberty. In no way does being an atheist require one to accept that some other person is somehow deserving of some sort of absolute power over another person. Most athiests I know tend to follow a "live and let live" sort of philosphy about life in general, something that is very conducive to the message of liberty.
In my experience, it is often people of faith that paint with this ridiculously broad brush and tend to have an attitude like "Somebody's gotta be in charge... might as well be us." See: The Crusades, The Spanish Inquisition, Muslim extremist jihad, Neo-cons, etc.
You have made many sweeping, and therefore flawed, statements.
not so much..
I'm talking from the context of liberty and the reality that there is a God, and he will judge us according to how we live up to his standard. The crusades, etc, are not examples of liberty, they are psuedo-religious tyrannies, where an elite class convinced the masses that they had God all figured out for them, exactly the same as any other tyranny, except more evil in the fact that it perverted religion to accomplish its goals. The elite of this kind of tyranny set themselves up as gods, or at least as God's proxy. God is personal and big enough for every individual, his only proxy is Christ.
I think the broad brush you should worry about is this belief that people can in fact "live and let live" without a God to guide them. Your assuming that the things you justify keeping, will never be the things that someone else justifies taking. Fortunately for theists, the Bible says, "thou shall not steal, and thou shall not covet." A standard by a higher authority than me about personal property rights, and I'm thankful for it.
Atheist can only use observation and science to ascertain truth, they have no higher authority for it. Therefore their perceptions will be lensed by their own motives. They fiat morality, much like the fed fiats currency. Niether have a standard, gold, God or otherwise.
Well said Forge And that's
Well said Forge
And that's coming from an athiest. Live and let live, don't INITIATE the use of force by violating the right to anothers life, freedom, or property. This is proper because we are here on earth trying to live together, not because god says so. That's my belief and I can adhere to it as well as any person of faith can adhere to theirs.
excellent point...
The last line logically says it all! We see daily in all the totalitarian regimes around the world, the former rebels for "freedom" for the masses acquire their power then the thuggery begins, used against their fellow citizens who were hoping for better. Castro and Winnie the "necklacer" Mandela come to mind.
Goodness and decency are not innate...they are either acquired through being taught that there is something higher than self to obey and the resultant consequences of not doing so, or it is acquired by whatever good example is left of a Christian heritage!
"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom."
"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom." Patrick Henry
If this is the case then shouldn't all the problems of the world
be fixed ? Damned good thing I'm not religious.
*******************************************
*,`*•.¸.•¨¯¨•.__________________III Live like you mean it
~~ | ~ () ~[|||||||||||||||||||||[~} Your life is your own
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !
maybe
if you were religious the problems of the world would be fixed?? sorry, couldn't resist.
Meh.
Happy Sunday.
EOM.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
I squirm in my seat whenever a topic about mysticism gets ...
posted.
Do as you wish ...
But in my opinion ...
An OP on the subject is a bit over the top on any blog.
What do they say about the two things that never should be discussed at a party?
Well, on a blog, I think it should be only one thing.
WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/48994
WAHOR!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/48994
sorry Rhino... but you have
sorry Rhino... but you have no clue.
"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny."
-Thomas Jefferson
I am more concerned about the return of my money than the return on my money. --Mark Twain
“A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Prov. 22:3; 27:12 KJV)
Hey McCain-----┌П┐(◣_◢)┌П┐
Happy equinox! "All great
Happy equinox!
"All great truths begin as blasphemies."
"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."
The equinox
is in mid-March.
Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!
All hail peepus christ.
The father son and holy marshmallow. http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f171/joshthedork/Comments-...
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/