0 votes

Ron Paul Polling Match-Ups With Clinton, Obama

Rasmussen Reports, one of the nation's top pollsters, just analyzed the hypothetical general election match-ups between Ron Paul running against Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama.

Ron Paul gets 34% in a head-to-head match-up with Hillary Clinton, and gets 30% against Barak Obama. Among Republicans, Paul gets 65% against Clinton and 55% against Obama.

Paul has a favorable rating of 20% among likely voters nationwide. 38% have an unfavorable view, with 43% not sure. Paul is best known for his opposition to the Iraq War, while his pro-free-market and strict constutitionalist views are less known among voters.

Many Paul supporters may find these results discouraging, but they should not. The fact that this survey was done at all is a great victory, and the results are quite encouraging for a radical upstart campaign. Most people have now heard of Ron Paul, and one in five like him already.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

media coverage

I personally have stopped all my subscriptions to papers like the wall street journal, time magazine, and several others in "protest" to their slanted coverage of U.S. and world news. my thinking is why support the very people who are selling our country out. I find the internet to be invaluable for staying current with events which are shaping my life in the 21st century.

jimt

Name Recognition skews results

This is wonderful. Most people, given a choice between a name they've heard of, and one they haven't, will pick the familiar name, even if they don't particularly like them. The Democrats are not focussed, yet, on the Republican contenders. All we have to do is make him a household name to raise his numbers.

That, and hope people learned their lession voting for "Bush."

And not even yet. Republicans and the primary come first.

Dr. Paul's 20 years in Congress should be very reassuring to those scared to vote for a maverick.

IMissLiberty

You can reach voters in California, here: http://consequeries.com/California-voter-guide

The Key to this Report....


"Paul is viewed favorably by just 20% of likely voters nationwide. Thirty-eight percent (38%) have an unfavorable view while 43% are Not Sure what to think of him."

We know that as people get to know Dr. Paul, they like what he stands for. So, when the 43% gets to know him, I predict that at least 60% will like him. So, that would give him a 55% favorability rating and make him very competitive with Hillary and Obama.

Match-up

I see this as good news. They must be starting to look at Ron Paul as a serious candidate now. This gets him even more name recognition.

Sfp
Chesapeake, VA

Much ado.

.
The elections are 14 months away. Who cares what the numbers are today? Now, if the elections were to be held this coming November, that would be a different story. But it is just too early in the race to pay attention to this stuff.

We must not be distracted by trivia--which this is. We need to keep calling, emailing and showing up for Dr. Paul. That is the only way he will stand a chance of doing well.

Some democrats will never vote for Paul

This is a weird presidential race. With respect to the classic litmus test issues (abortion, guns, taxes) there are candidates on the Republican side that many Republicans just cannot vote for. I don't see why Romney and Giuliani are polling so high because a lot of Republican primary voters would refuse to vote for these people based on the abortion issue and others based on the gun issue.

There are also many Democratic candidates that also fail to meet the primary voters litmus tests. Edwards, Richardson, and Dodd on gay marriage. Hillary and Edwards on the war. So I don't get why these people are polling so high.

Either the polls are seriously flawed, or the people are seriously misinformed.

With that said, I think a lot of Democrats will cross over and vote for Paul in the primaries because of the war and his stance on corporate welfare.

But just remember that usually only 55% of the voting age population votes in any presidential election. I'm counting on a large portion of that 45% being disillusioned voters and turning out for Ron Paul, since I'm one of them and I know of more than a few people that are like me.

Another Premature Prognostication

General election polls are meaningless at this point in the game.

My guess is that 75+% of the people polled didn't really know much, if anything, about the fine Dr.

Besides, 92.3% of all polls are completely fabricated to reflect the agenda of the pollster. Everyone knows that!

Do we know who pays Rassmussen?

Do we know who pays Rassmussen?

Personally, I like the gambling odds where someone's gonna lose money on the opinion best, so I'm for Ron paying few if any pollsters. I just wish I'd gotten in on that very nice trainride in Feb. but money's tight!! :)
JMR