A Warning: Our Grass is being replaced by Astroturf
Jeffrey Grupp at infowars warns about what the April 15th Teaparties were all about.
---
Two recent Infowars.com articles (my article and the JustGetUsThere article) in the past few days have discussed how the mass media is hijacking the patriot and Truth movements by (1) attempting to take over the debates about the issues that the patriot groups have been discussing for decades by suddenly, all-at-once blasting them into the mass media in a twisted, vacuous, and manipulated way, and (2) by taking over the anti-Fed “revolution,” also by spotlighting it vacuously in the corporatist mass media. But we know that if the New World Order wants to hijack the patriot and Truth movements, they won’t just do it from these angles, and instead they (A) will attack it from many angles, and more importantly, they (B) will use their attack to, additionally, set up their Brave New World. This article is about (B), and what I want to suggest is that the New World Order is deliberately false-flag-attacking the Fed in order to ultimately destroy it, leaving the perception of a void in the financial world, wherein they will fill that void with THEIR choice of a new banking and money system: global currency, global bank, global governance/government. More specifically, here’s what I theorize is commencing:
1. The New World Order is using the corporatist mass media to co-opt the real anti-Fed revolt (originally started by WeAreChange), in order to blend it with a fake anti-Fed revolt that they are setting up, in order to incite a broad anti-Fed revolution among the US citizenry, which should hit high gear later this year, if not by summer.
2. The New World Order will use what I just stated in 1, and the pre-planned and staged problems with the increasingly weakening banks and US dollar (which will ultimately collapse fully), in order to modify or abolish the Fed and the current money system.
3. And the New World Order will present a specific solution to this pre-planned scenario I just stated in 2 in order to replace the current banking and money system with, they will tell us, a ‘better’ system: a world banking and money system
Read the rest of the article here:
http://www.infowars.com/the-end-the-fed-protests-are-the-sec...
can you say that in Chinese?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/04/english-only.html
WE ARE GOING TO WIN!
___.---.___
.' ( ) '.
) /)' '( )
',_( ';-;'\_,'
|-|
(")
I watched that Rachel Maddow
I watched that Rachel Maddow clip where Krugman called them astroturfing events, and I admit I'm now plagiarising the term as well, because he's the first one I ever heard use the term. I'm just running with it now, because people now know what it means, and I think there's a bit of astroturfing going on with the teaparties. I noticed Jane's comment on the "One million" thread about being "fake angry" people. I don't think people are being fake angry. I don't doubt whether anyone is angry. Hell, all 300 million of us shouldn't have any problems finding a reason to be angry. So, the only part I see as being astroturf has been in the marketing of these events by the MSM.
Wait a minute...
The first time I heard the term astroturf, it was in reference to Obama supporters, during the election, and from a Ron Paul supporter!!! In fact, I believe it was right here on this forum, although it may have been ronpaulforums! It was definitely one or the other! F*** Krugman and the rest of MSM! There's not an original thought amongst them!
NJ
Crummy Krugman plagarised this term!
Plagiarism is the author's attempt to use the work of other people as your own, without disclosing their involvement. Astroturfing is exactly the oppose: it is an organization's attempt to attribute their own work to other people without disclosing the involvement of the organization.
If I said Paul Krugman was a plagiarist because he quoted other people in his columns (with attribution), that would be ridiculous. I would owe him a correction. And possibly monetary damages. Words mean things.
Yet, in today's New York Times column (in which he makes some reasonable points about the sad state of the Republican Party), Paul Krugman grossly misuses a term to libel a variety of people.
Continued:
http://www.thenextright.com/jon-henke/the-tea-party-protests
I'm inherently distrustful
I'm inherently distrustful of the MSM, as I believe their track record has proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted.
Don't you find it odd that the MSM traditionally ignores us, yet in this case, the teaparties were hyped up in the media by both the left and the right? The left leaning MSM derogatively called them teabagging events of an astroturf nature. The right leaning MSM hyped them as if they favored our grassroots from the beginning.
I just have been at this too long to not see that they are trying to use us. Is it a coincidence that on the eve of the C4L in St. Louis that the MIAC report surfaced? Is it any coincidence that the DHS report came out just days before the teaparties?
And I dispute as you do, the idea that the real anti-Fed began with wearechange. That's an obviously ridiculous assertion. The real anti-Fed movement dates back to 1913.
And you were just duped..
...by Nancy Pelosi, one of the biggest hijackers. And the anti-Fed movement was started long before those in the "We Are Change" were even BORN.
I am not sure I follow this current conspiracy theory. How is a "fake anti-Fed movement" going to work? People are waking up to the idea of who controls our money and that's a good thing, whereas in the past they would have thought anyone talking about this was nuts.