Anybody feel like having a 9-11 fight?

Or why not create one -- Because the average topic in here is more Jonesian then Paulian -- seriously.

Are you aware of how many DPers we've lost over 911-Truth (et al)?

I brought 15 people to this sight and every single one of them left owing to 911-Truthers -- Most Americans are the type of Patriots (or wannabe Pats) that would accept (as an introduction to gov't dismantling) the notion of "End the Fed" -- It's a simple argument and demonstratable inefficient abdication of Congress.

They will embrace an end to Taxes -- as a 2nd step.

As a distant 3rd step the end of the Department of Education.

The 98% who voted against us -- Did so, because and in part, of the fringe elements that are the most vocal all over the net. Remember Daily Paul at one time was the preeminent site for Ron Paul info.

We used to have several big name Mises Professors posting here -- We've lost a lot.

I train Military and Law Enforcement in Defensive Tactics and Conscious-Sleep and none of them are even close to ready to believe or take serious 911-Truth claims. Please don't mention Ventura -- He's loved by "real" Navy Seals, but he was a Frog Man (not a Navy Seal) and is thought of as a celebrity-soldier who was nowhere near any action in Vietnam. UDT's rarely if every saw direct contact missions. Trust me I trained many of these guys.

It is "either or" because Ron Paul (our namesake on the site and url) is against the notion of an inside-job -- Making the every single day conversation of it -- The 1000 or more posts, a DailySlap in his face (my opinion). He was asked no less than 4 times in national debates and post debate interviews about 911-Truth.

Let's get the statistics -- I bet 911-Truth and people like me trying to get you guys to let it go until after 2012 are the most post topics.

2nd place would be Chemtrails -- 3rd Fema Camps - 4th Birther (and that's only been going since last June).

When I say there's no new evidence -- Name one politician on board that's ready to go to court? When I say no new evidence I mean that can link it to an "inside-job"

And even if somehow it was a private-job (insurance scam) -- Building 7 -- It would still mean that the Gov't was completely incompitant.

I "know" it was an inside job -- Because of all the targets - Building 7 - The airtrafic fiasco - The un-snapped fighter jets -- et al. I'm a 911-Believer -- I know however that RP has lost some credibility over this.

Rodger Hedgecock and Schnitt both recently mentioned RP's "followers" who believe of an gov't inside job -- They have 10,000,000 viewers each week. If we could removed the RP from the front of the Truth-Movement is all I'm saying -- Why is he forced to give it credibility? It's like identity theft to go on his sites and support something, as his follower, he does not support.

That's not the point. The point is we need to steer the 98% or maybe some tipping point percentage -- maybe 20% of the folks who didn't vote for RP and when that happens we win something.

Ron Paul wants to win End the Fed -- Can we give him that -- Or are we going to demand that if there's one thing that wins it must be 911.

I say keep 911-Truth separate from everything Ron Paul -- Let it stand on its own.

Why should I go somewhere else -- If I bring a friend to this site -- It's Chemtrails - Birthers - FEMA Camps - Truthers

Octobox

exactly how to keep the people stupid and they have beefed it up in a big way this year. If you watch only an hour of TV now you find yourself losing about 30 IQ points an hour if you don't realize you are being bombarded with stupidity that is .

*******************************************
*,`*•.¸.•¨¯¨•.__________________III Live like you mean it
~~ | ~ () ~[|||||||||||||||||||||[~} Your life is your own