0 votes

Second Amendment Upheld By Ninth Circuit As "Against A Degenerate And Tyrannical Government"






Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted

January 15, 2009—San Francisco, California

Filed April 20, 2009

GOULD, Circuit Judge, concurring:

I concur in Judge O’Scannlain’s opinion but write to elaborate my view of the policies underlying the selective incorporation decision. First, as Judge O’Scannlain has aptly explained, the rights secured by the Second Amendment are “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition,” and“necessary to the Anglo-American regime of ordered liberty.”

The salient policies underlying the protection of the right to bear arms are of inestimable importance. The right to bear arms is a bulwark against external invasion. We should not be overconfident that oceans on our east and west coasts alone can preserve security. We recently saw in the case of the terrorist attack on Mumbai that terrorists may enter a country covertly by ocean routes, landing in small craft and then assembling to wreak havoc. That we have a lawfully armed populace adds a measure of security for all of us and makes it less likely that a band of terrorists could make headway inan attack on any community before more professional forces arrived.

1 Second, the right to bear arms is a protection against the possibility that even our own government could degenerate into tyranny, and though this may seem unlikely, this possibility should be guarded against with individual diligence.

Third, while the Second Amendment thus stands as a protection against both external threat and internal tyranny, the recognition of the individual’s right in the Second Amendment, and its incorporation by the Due Process Clause against the states, is not inconsistent with the reasonable regulation of weaponry.

All weapons are not “arms” within the meaning of the Second Amendment, so, for example, no individual could sensibly argue that the Second Amendment gives them a right to have nuclear weapons or chemical weapons in their home for self-defense. Also, important governmental interests will justify reasonable regulation of rifles and handguns, and the problem for our courts will be to define, in the context of particular regulation by the states and municipalities, what is reasonable and permissible and what is unreasonable and offensive to the Second Amendment.

Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

interesting "When


"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny."
-Thomas Jefferson

I am more concerned about the return of my money than the return on my money. --Mark Twain

This is great.

"The credit expansion boom is built on the sands of banknotes and deposits. It must collapse.", www.mises.org

"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com

Committees of Safety Conference Call Tonight 9pm ET


Join the Committees of Safety on the weekly national conference call every Wednesday night 9-11 PM EST. Call in (724) 444-7444, then Call ID: 35794.

The calls are co-hosted by Walter Reddy and Devvy Kidd, and would also like to hear from as many of you as possible. *Next conference call 4-22-09

You can also listen to the call live at www.talkshoe.com/tc/35794 as well as listen to past conference calls.

World's Greatest Business

"The Number one reason people lose money is the FEAR of losing money." Sir John Templeton

Auto - un-caps...love it. The source doc was all caps

World's Greatest Business

"The Number one reason people lose money is the FEAR of losing money." Sir John Templeton