President Obama Likely to Pick Pro-Abortion Supreme Court Justice After Souter
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
May 1, 2009
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Now that pro-abortion Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his future retirement in June, speculation turns to President Barack Obama. During the presidential campaign, he made it clear he would only appoint a pro-abortion activist to the high court if given a chance to nominate a new judge.
During the presidential election last year, Obama claimed he wouldn't have a pro-abortion litmus test for the high court-- “I think it's true that we shouldn't apply a strict litmus test” but he has said in the past that he thinks any Supreme Court nominee should support the Roe decision.
He admitted that “Roe versus Wade probably hangs in the balance” because the next president will appoint one or more Supreme Court judges.
“I would not provide a litmus test. But I am somebody who believes that Roe versus Wade was rightly decided,” Obama added.
Submitted by Ron Aldof on Fri, 05/01/2009 - 09:58.
Liberal leanings.
Ron Paul for POTUS 2012
—
***********Ron Paul for POTUS 2012***********
*************Obama Is A Communist!************
**********Repeal the 17th Amendment**********
Double the size of the House of Representatives
$$$$$$$$$AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE$$$$$$$$$$
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says the Court needs another Woman
which is great as long as she is not at all like Ginsburg
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-05-05-...
Follow me on Twitter for breaking news on Ron Paul and the U.S. Economy:
www.twitter.com/AbolishTheFed
The agenda is pro-abortion.
President Obama Likely to Pick Pro-Abortion Supreme Court Justice After Souter
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
May 1, 2009
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Now that pro-abortion Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced his future retirement in June, speculation turns to President Barack Obama. During the presidential campaign, he made it clear he would only appoint a pro-abortion activist to the high court if given a chance to nominate a new judge.
During the presidential election last year, Obama claimed he wouldn't have a pro-abortion litmus test for the high court-- “I think it's true that we shouldn't apply a strict litmus test” but he has said in the past that he thinks any Supreme Court nominee should support the Roe decision.
He admitted that “Roe versus Wade probably hangs in the balance” because the next president will appoint one or more Supreme Court judges.
“I would not provide a litmus test. But I am somebody who believes that Roe versus Wade was rightly decided,” Obama added.
More:
http://www.lifenews.com/nat5013.html
Always more to these stories than meet the eye
Clinton lawyer who argued before Supreme Court found dead in apparent "suicide"
These stories are connected.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gpxeazwd7h...
"Obamney care," Nuff said.
Perhaps you would be so kind to let the rest of us in on
the connection. Connected because they are both lawyers? Because they are both liberal collectivists?
"The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence." Thomas H. Huxley
Souter's a liberal anyway.
They'll probably replace him with a cloned representation of Josef Stalin.
Souter
Liberal leanings.
Ron Paul for POTUS 2012
***********Ron Paul for POTUS 2012***********
*************Obama Is A Communist!************
**********Repeal the 17th Amendment**********
Double the size of the House of Representatives
$$$$$$$$$AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE$$$$$$$$$$
Fingers Crossed..
Here's hoping that Hell freezes over and Washington's pigs start flying as Obama appoints Judge Andrew Napolitano in Souter's place.
I Don't Think So
Would be great, but:
White House Releases Requirements for High Court :-)
J.K. Baltzersen
Mises Community profile
J.K. Baltzersen
Mises Community profile