Fiat Terror, Fiat Currency.

Both are at play bankrupting our humanity.

I say they are like each other, because the hurdle to discussing the nature of fiat currency with colleagues, friends and family, is often as equally challenging as trying to have a conversation about ginned-up terror threats, overblown scares of pandemics, and even/especially the hall-of-mirrors source of blowback. Only difference, is the inversion. One has at its very heart the eternal poison pill of inevitable financial collapse every time it is applied, while the other is more phantom simply promising to scare us to death by fear, however bankrupting us for real as we chase our own tail evermore doing little else.

I've been wondering if the resistance to discussing these two different items are sociologically and psychologically similar? Scientific and governmental misfeasance is bad enough because even though it is demonstrable without accusations of intent, we as a people employing these public servants are still unable to prevent or remove such mistake-ers from Office as They invoke innocence from charges of malfeasance.

Additionally, added from the conspiratorial angle, if such a natural predisposition to discount real threats (fiat currency), while inversely fearing possibilities greater than probabilities (such as 'terror') is magnified by intention through media and government malfeasance (if the phrase "preponderance of evidence" means ANYTHING, thus the very real responsibilities to address this in full once considered) and rushes forth inductive fears a thousand fold causing our loved ones to overt their eyes at all costs... how then do we address this?

Anyone care to discuss?