0 votes

Daily Paul Collectivist vs Daily Paul Individual-Anarchists

A Collectivist (as a minimum -- a starting point) Groups and Generalizes people into absolutist positions -- such as; "all cops are evil."
-----Us vs Them (unionist mindset)

An Individual-Anarchists (tries his or her best to) never do this. No ones perfect but when they error and collectivize (smile) they will appologize or correct themselves.
----- I-and-I (We as Individuals -- Rastafarian Anarchism)

A "gentlemen" is always always an Individual-Anarchist.

Is there anyone in the U.S as much a gentle-man as our Ron Paul? Seriously.

People who work with him say he is so sweet and non-forceful that any subtle disagreement with his position he automatically relents. He had to work very hard against this trait during the elections -- remember when we were like "RP needs to be more blunt and forceful."

Abdicators of Free-Will are never gentlemanly -- They "lump" -- They "group" -- They "collectivize" (smile) -- They are Socialists in essence. They are always looking for the next leader to abdicate to -- Abdication to an Individual-Anarchist can never work -- because the I-A never wants the responsibility -- they abore the slavery of it. I-A = I-and-I

"All Cops are Evil Nazis" -- "All Cops will (as fact) Kick people in the head when they are done, when they get the opportunity."

911 was a "Gov't Inside Job" -- All 1,800,000 gov't employees?

A collectivist always (overtly so) generalize -- Because of anger and frustration. Because they are bankrupt emotionally/logically or maybe it's just that their account balance is low; some are in deficit - haha.

A collectivist has no peace -- Their heart is full of fear. They have no sollutions -- They are Welfarists (as are all collectivist) even if they say they are "pacifists" their abdication creates "warfarism."

Daily Paul should become an Individual-Anarchist Site

Instead of the "We the Abdicators" -- we become "We the Polishers" (of liberty). Sometimes "We the Sandblasters" hahaha.

Gentlemen

and

Gentlewomen

An Individual-Anarchist will say "Build #7 warrants further investigation -- I'll hold off on speculation over who did it, so we can get our day in court."

The collectivist says "Screw the day in court -- Let's burn the house down -- Let's lump in all-of-gov't" -- A 1.8M conspiracy-theory drives page-counts better than Irrefutable Facts (Build #7). I will be labled a "de-bunker" (in collectivist fashion) because I disagree with the Universal All-Gov't Inside Job Speculation.

Flame On!

I-and-I (the Universal One - or "We the Individual" perspective)

I-and-I -- respects "we" as "individuals" and "unity" -- It's probably one of the most potent spiritual statement out there. Thank you Shiva Haired Big Spliff Smoking Rastafarians for keeping it simple.

Octobox




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OctoBox VS OctoMom

OctoMom
- Obsesed with brooding hordes of children
- Caught up in wellfare checks
- Imagines she is fighting a conservative lifestyle
- Is entertaining to talk about on fox news

OctoBox
- Obsessed with brooding hordes of anarchists
- Caught up in technical jargon
- Imagines they are fighting a collectivist lifestyle
- Is entertaining to talk about on the daily paul

============================

Glen Beck -- An Exposed Enemy:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/90198
Glenn Beck Supports NAFTA and taking your job:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/86643

============================

Glen Beck -- An Exposed Enemy:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/90198
Glenn Beck Supports NAFTA and taking your job:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/86643

OpenRevolt -- That was clever

I've rued the day they named her that -- nice frame up and comparison :)

"obsessed with brooding hordes of anarchists" -- I'm an individual-anarchist and I'm obsessed with liberty and only recently have I decided to take on the collectivist. A mild obsession nevertheless.

Well played sir.

I agree 100% with you on Glenn Beck (I believe you and I were the first ones to out him on DP) - 5-8 months or so ago.

You'd be fun to play the dozens with.

Octobox

Octogoon Pegs In Round Holes vs. Octopus’s Garden*

Ironically, at first I thought OpenRevolt's post was going to set up the dialectic ambivalence between simply Closed To r’Evolving vs. Openly Revolting Snark … but I nearly misjudged his potential had I jumped to such a conclusion. His post was clever, humorous and elegantly communicated thoughts about how he hears points raised by a particular individual here on DP who is not shy about telling us where, and with whom, he stands.

Am I understanding correctly that OR would align with those of us who think our friend Octo/Box/Mom has underestimated the grains of truth that seem to substantiate prejudgment influencing attitudes of fear and loathing which greets those who may be seen to embrace the stereotype by choosing to don a badge in the new world . Many uniform wearers aspire to fit the all-too-prevalent image of shaved-head–steroids-intoxicated–bad-boys.(Remember when TV stopped the reruns of Andy Griffith; Adam 12 – ‘protect and serve’; and Dragnet – ‘just the facts, mam’ and started in with Starsky and Hutch ?). Today the caricature of hardass nazi cop is more universally familiar than the equally characteristic generalization of shyster lawyer.

I suspect the problem is more a consequence of self image among those in the respective professions. Who are their heroes? What ideals do they uphold? Who are their mentors and leaders? Politics, pull and Peter principle are the operative forces effecting advancement, and indeed survival in the career. So who do the ambitious in these fields emulate.

BigT makes the right point. Shouldn’t we hope that Octo/Box/Mom tucks tightly under His wing these ugly ducklings before they start to spread Their wings. He wants to initiate them to Daily Paul and Oath Keepers. May this fraternity prove a better police academy.(To now mix my metaphors – I’m sure you both … or should I say - each … will understand): I, for one, am glad Octo’s got the ball. It takes a team player to quarterback a winning team. What’s more, I’m happy he’s such a good sport. ;-)

*[ "Octopus's Garden" is a song written by Ringo Starr with a little help from George Harrison (although it is credited solely to Starr, as "Starkey").
Harrison commented: "'Octopus's Garden' is Ringo's song. It's only the second song Ringo has ever written, mind you, and it's lovely." He added that the song gets very deep into your consciousness "because it's so peaceful. I suppose Ringo is writing cosmic songs these days without even realizing it."

The idea for the song came about when Starr was on a boating trip with his family in Sardinia in 1968. He ordered Fish and Chips for lunch, but instead of fish he got squid (it was the first time he'd eaten squid, and said "It was OK. A bit rubbery. Tasted like chicken."Then the boat's captain told Starr about how octopuses travel along the sea bed picking up stones and shiny objects with which to build gardens.

Starr said that hearing about octopuses spending their days collecting shiny objects at the bottom of the sea was one of the happiest things he had ever heard, inspiring him to write this song.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopus's_Garden

I like what you said here

A carefully thought out and laid out line of reasoning.

I know 1000's of cops (literally) but I don't know 900,000 cops

I've posed the very questions you've raised here -- many times over the years.

It depends on the region -- Big City Urban Cop vs Suburban Cop vs Rural Cop -- as to where they get their influences.

All the Adam 12 cops are retiring or darn near it.

The greatest threat we face with the "next generation" of cops is that in this generation the older cops are dropping like flies -- injury, stress related disease, 68% divorce rate, alcohol abuse, early retirement and entering the private sector - etc etc.

My point is there will be no more mentoring in the future. The next generation will predominately come from returning military (to ease the training budgets of cash-strapped departments).

These young men will predominately come from somewhere else and not have a stake in the community -- in the 70's and 80's cops almost always came from within the community they policed -- now exponentially they come from elsewhere. This is a cultural and tactical nightmare (not knowing the streets or the temperament of the residence - the history).

I don't see a way to stop it other than helping Ron Paul do exactly what he's trying to do and roll up our sleaves: Strike-the-Root (End the Fed) and Get involved Locally (become the social and economic mentors of the next generation -- like I'm doing).

Great Post LibBerte

Octobox - I love Cephalopods

:-)

-

that's good

hahaha!

Hey! That's inciting a fight!

hahaha!

uhm

by creating a dichotomy grouping people between "collectivist" and "individual-anarchist", and then proceeding to make generalizations about both,

doesn't this become a collectivist screed?

Yonemoto: I'll answer this again

No problem.

Yes in absoltist terms it is collectivist reasoning.

But I did not make an absolutist statement -- By the consistency of my other posts you can see that.

I never said "all or most" DPers are one or the other category. I said there is a growing fight between two emerging philosophies: One who take an Individual-Anarchist Position and the other (un-wittingly) takes the Collectivist position.

A collectivist takes one bad cop and through very consistent posts blames ALL or MOST cops -- "Nazi Cops" - "Gastapo Police" - "Evil Cops" -- "Some one needs to Stop the Police" -- "Grab your guns" - "Cops are out of control"

The individualist says: one bad cop - one persecution.

The RP-type says; "how can I change or better the situation"
The Groupist-type says: "how can I flame harder with no intention to help."

Now here's the funny part. I never called out one person (who did not comment first) nor did I say in my post "so and so" individuals are collectivist. They assumed who I was talking to and outed themselves, hahaha.

Don't worry though -- as an individualist who's proven (over his career) to help those willing to be helped I will continue to make this basic argument.

900K cops -- 10 unique friends / family -- 9,000,000 potential fans of Liberty. Let's educate them on LEAP - Oathkeepers - Austrian Economics; rather than lambast them during their free-time as they are during every single shift.

I hope that answers your question / accusation.

Octobox

heh heh heh

-

oh, ingrid already posted

oh, ingrid already posted this below.

It bore repeating.

Thanks, both of you.

Octobox Good Posts -VS- Octobox Bad Posts

You have a few decent posts Octobox. But I think a lot of them suck.

Let me go check a few....brb.

all right. I've apparently confused you with someone else. I haven't found a post (out of 15), that strikes me as ignorant, or willfully stupid.

you actually seem fairly reasoned. ;-)

(me shuts down flame thrower)

A wise man with a good heart,

impossible to defeat.

Rock on, good man.

-

If some of the posts DID suck

Would you have withheld the "wise man, good heart" compliment? How does approval of 15 unspecified posts that we cannot see for ourselves somehow equal "wisdom and goodness"?

Frankly, I find this terribly annoying.

It's a greater virtue to act right.

Than to be right.

How is it "acting right" to praise a fool?

?

I wrote to you below as well.

I responded. Thanks.

Makia - Energy flows where thought goes.

Pono - Effectiveness is the measure of truth.

DFwrider: You are a very lucky man/woman

As I began to read that post my hand instinctively went for my katana -- luckily I read all the way through the post before I respond -- then I saw your jest [and spared your life] ;)

I wear a katana and a holstered ceramic vector (9mm) -- for future reference. Tread lightly my friend, smile.

*bows to warrior*

Hahahahaha - Great Delivery (post)

Octobox

bump

answer my question

I wonder why its like pulling teeth to get a straight answer

why do yes or no ? take mile long posts and 2 or 3 days

things like this make me say hmmmnnnnnnn.......

Fergmx1: You are insistent that I answer your questions :)

I am against the Patriot Act and Homeland Security -- why do you insist on labeling me?

Explorer Program

Is the above link what you are talking about?

Explorer Program 2

Is that more like what you are talking about?

They've had these types of programs since 1990 -- probably back to the early 80's.

What about this one?

Cadet Training

Well if you don't like these programs -- there are a few options for you.

#1 Blog about it -- Rail and Flame
#2 Abdicate to a Politcian (get them to do something)
#3 Approach these people as a Constitutional Instructor -- Introduce RP's position papers on Federal Reserve and 2nd Amendment Rights.

I'm against the organizations if my tax dollars are being used to pay for them -- If the parents consent and if it is private backed -- then it's all gravy because that's how a free-society works. Tax dollars NO.

I don't think most kids spend very much time in these programs.

Octobox

hahaha!!! thanks for proving my point again

It is impossible to get a straight answer out of you on stuff that should be obvious because of the trouble we are in. You act like you dont know what Im talking about, then post vids of firefighter training! Hey genius I was referring to the New York Times article that showed homeland security (yes your tax dollars) training 14-16yr old boy and girl scouts with riot gear and machine guns to be NAZI thugs. It was all over the front page of this site and impossible to miss. They even ran drills about taking out iraq vets after they come home AND STILL YOU MAKE EXCUSES!!!!!

Why do I insist on labeling you? Please I am lol so hard it hurts. YOU are the one trying to put everyone in two seperate camps. (just like left and right) But my favorite is your last sentence. " I dont think most kids spend very much time these programs." Move along everybody nothing to see here!!! To me you are like a shiny new plate glass window on a sunny day, because I can easily see right through you.

Fergmx: I never said there were only two camps

I said I was against Homeland Security and Patriot Act -- Not because they were suggested or offered as a solution to some problem -- In a free-market we'd have protection services -- even pre-emptive ones. The difference is we would not have tax or wage theft to cover the cost.

You answered the question for me -- It's gov't sponsored so I don't support it. If this was 100% private funded I wouldn't care as long as they were not violating my rights.

Now that you have my answer -- You can go back to your lair and find something else to rail about.

All that being said -- I love warrior training. Knives - Guns - Sticks - Hand-to-Hand.

I trained my daughter in all of these and she has saved herself 4 times. One of them she took-out 3 attackers one wielding a knife -- laid them out. She was 13 and they were 19 - 21. They pulled her into a dark ally - exposed the knife - and probably had the intention of raping her. She elbowed and kneed her way out of it - was cut by the knife slammed against a dumpster but wound up breaking the noses of two of them and crushing the nuts of another. She's 5'3 and 130lbs (probably 5'2 and 100lbs back then).

Is she a "Nazi" -- Are these kids Nazi Youth? I don't think so -- but I don't want the Gov't training them - regardless.

Octobox

My girls love their first lessons in "kungfu"

4 and a half and 2 and a half.

"Daddy, can we do the kungfu thing?"

Push hands. Awesome. When they are taller, san sou will be a blast for them i'm sure.

Yeah, it's the gov't sponsorship that blows. But no law is going to stop bigotry, or anger. That's why i share this stuff with my daughters, and those I care about.

Many of our solutions are going to be judicial and individual - the mass political movement is only part of this project.

-

He's not going to generalize and say

that all these programs are inherently evil, that is the point of his OP.

Because he says "There are good things about these programs, there is positive potential, working with kids IS important, you know" you want to throw the baby, and octobox, out with the bathwater.

I'm sure if you got a group of kids together, you'd think that teaching them how to be assertive and important to work on a team.

The reason most kids don't spend very long in these programs, and for most it probably only contributes to their general apathy that many are programed with - is because the context of trying to teach them these important skills is bogus. The content is fine. But i'll be a million bucks a Ron Paul supporter or two is in on those programs, and others similar.

If my son wanted to participate, I'd let him and talk to him about his motivations and experience. A boys father is usually way more powerful of an influence than other experiences. Should be like this when the the children are young.

-

You give yourself away, Octobox

You must be in the dreaded collectivist camp because with this post you separate the DP into two "collections" of persons: collectivists and individualists.

Ingrid2: I didn't divide into two campes

#1 I never said "all daily paulers" -- I said Daily Paul Collectivist vs Daily Paul Individual-Anarchists -- there are plenty of people who fall in one or both of those categories -- also there are people who do not post, so we don't know.

#2 I never said you or Fergie were in the collectivist camp -- I just said what the characteristics were and then you guys replied (as did a few others).

#3 I never said "Absolute Collectivist" -- As if there's no hope for return, hahaha. I was referring to those whose posts are "predominately" collectivist in nature.

I defined my terms -- It's obvious what I'm saying -- I just don't know how you guys are arguing it.

I want to bring cops and first responders in here - To learn from the intelligent DPers who post here often. I want them to learn about LEAP - Oathkeepers - and Austrian Economics.

Really what I'm doing is pointing out two emerging philosophies on DP: Individualist (people who see a crime and blame the individual) and groupist (people who see a crime and isolate an entire population).

There are areas where the two camps agree; which is fine. The areas we disagree on are without civility -- bullying and name calling abound.

Would Ron Paul welcome these folks or would he exclude them (or chastise them for the actions of distint individuals)?

Octobox

Octobox

Here's a fair question, with a little bit of prefacing.

Surely, the LE personnel realize that because of the widespread abuses in their profession, that many people have come to distrust them.
Certainly this concern is not limited to DP in any way.
Yet, you seem to infer that it is people on the DP that are preventing you from recommending LE personnel to come here.

So, why can't the LE personnel just come here and take the "good with the bad", understanding that their profession needs cleaning up, and that the response from angry posters is perfectly normal under the present circumstances, and is to be expected. After all, this is what "cleaning up" is all about, isn't it? If there weren't any problems, massive numbers of people wouldn't be pissed.

The idea that we all have to submerge our actual views on the subject, simply to create a false atmosphere that makes the LE personnel "feel at home" is not genuine. They need to see reality, not some "fake atmosphere".
It's time for them to deal with what's been made by their profession. They can look at it, and work on cleaning it up.
Seeing the magnitude of the job ahead of them might be just what they need to start taking some action to clean up the mess that their cohorts have made.

BigT: I had 17 (or so) LE friends on here - they all

left when in June of last year we went from Daily Paul Activist / Educational site to becoming a 911-Truth / Fear and Loathing site.

The "fear and loathing" is a combination of "Chicken Little Hysteria" and "Hating Police" as if they are a hive-mind rather than individuals -- instead of following RP's example of individual-liberty, individual-responsibility, and individual-persecution with the intention of healing.

BigT: I have said this so many times that I do not expect people to "get it" but you are lumping individual officers who error, are un-suited for the job, or who are ill from stress over the entire LE population of 900K people.

Besides - the main question on DP is -- how would RP conduct dialogue with cops -- as individuals or as a hive-mind -- as a gentlemen with the intent to help -- or as an evil horde needing to be publically flogged?

Octobox

Then these "individuals"

need to "un-lump themselves" and start distinguishing themselves from the rest of the thugs.
If they come on here with the recognition that the LE profession is badly tarnished, and begin discussion groups with people and other LE officers about how they are going to fight the corruption and stop the abuses by fellow officers when they witness it happening,and form freedom-solidarity groups among their ranks, then I see no problems with anyone welcoming them here.
Think "Jack McLamb".

If these individuals start professing that they are going to refuse the orders that the corrupt politicians dictate, and will stand up against it, then we can talk.
If any of these individuals wants to make excuses for "why they have to do these abusive actions" and get all "whiny" about us not liking it, then we don't need to talk.

I don't know of anybody here that wouldn't welcome any LE personnel that posts about how he is working to advance the freedom agenda, and how he is working to stop the "bad apples".
It would be awesome PR for the good police, for it to become known that they are actually doing something to stop the abuses of the bad apples, and not just standing by.

It's just like a business. If my business had terrible PR about horrible customer service, and my business reputation suffered, then it is on my head to go above and beyond the call in customer service, to overturn that bad reputation. It may take years, and get only a partial result. But when people have a sour feeling about something, they aren't too quick to change their minds. And there's been years and years of LE "doing their jobs", which entailed hideous breaches of the public trust, en masse. It's gonna take a while to turn that around.
Now is a good time to start.

BigT: No one is posting the1000's of citations for valor

that are awarded every year -- There have only been negative posts (save the ones I and a few others have posted on my "Nazi Cop 2" thread).

They are not distinguishing themselve to you because you do not know 900K cops -- You do not know 1000's of cops (as I do) -- You do not know 50 cops or even 10 that are your best friends or very close acquaintences. You are viewing their world and them as individuals through blood-stained rose colored glasses.

Since you are asking them to 'step up' you must know that they have not been stepping up -- which suggests you've investigated this.

How many medals of valor or honory citations went out in 2008 and what were the circumstances? Can you name one -- for whom -- and for what act of valor. Or do you believe those are 100% publicity stunts?

Okay forget acts of valor -- Let's look at one area I think Cops really shine -- above and beyond the call of their duty.

Police Activities League -- What is it - How many hours are spent being "big brothers or big sisters?"

There are over 500 PAL centers in the U.S serving 500,000 or so kids per year in such sports as: Judo, Boxing, Basketball, Beach Volleyball, Educational Tutoring, Baseball, Football, Soccer, Hockey (in some states), Track and Field, Yoga, Wrestling, Karate, MMA, Gold - etc. Shaq - Tiger Woods - Michael Jordan are big supporters of P.A.L

Here's a video (there are 100's of these): PAL

At "40 seconds" you can see an officer with diabolical plans -- after working with these kids this officer (you an tell this is true because we have a video) that she wants to run out with the other 900K officers and smash some skulls.

There 100's of these videos and in them there are happy children -- "Psssf; obviously these are the children of crack parents who get a nickle bag if their kids will smile for the lying fascist director."

Here's another one -- This one shows "black people" having "fun" with cops -- Off camera another video captures what's really going on (subversive)!!!

PAL2

There's nothing these folks can do to show you the positivity they are trying to bring if you ONLY study the negative.

900K Cops -- 10 Uniques Friends / Family -- 9,000,000 potential fans of liberty. Quick hatin' and start participatin' - smile.

Good Luck With Absolute Terms of Receptivity

I think you need to ask, "am I focusing on a super-minority of incidences that are negative and ignoring the potential of 9M RP fans or the good work that's already being done?"

We just need to privatize the police force -- With budgets being cut this is the time to strike -- The Free-Market would save their jobs.

Octobox