Weekend Watching: The Trials of Henry Kissinger

0 votes

Kissinger. The original neocon fear & war monger.

This documentary is based on the excellent book, The Trial of Henry Kissinger by Christopher Hitchens.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

National Security Advisor takes orders from Henry Kissinger

Retired Major General James Jones is our National Security Advisor (NSA). Addressing the Council on Foreign Relations he told those in attendance exactly what his chain of command is. "As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today."

Read More;

www.examiner.com/x-4285-Salt-Lake-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2009...

National Security Advisor takes orders from Henry Kissinger

Retired Major General James Jones is our National Security Advisor (NSA). Addressing the Council on Foreign Relations he told those in attendance exactly what his chain of command is. "As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today."

Read More;

www.examiner.com/x-4285-Salt-Lake-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2009...

Beware - This is CFR disinformation in part

There is no doubt as to Kissinger's perfidious and criminal past, but remember, he has been the darling of many administrations, including GOP, has been one of the chief architects of CFR and NWO strategy at the behest of the Rockefellars for many years, and can be found at the core of their policies... he is however, expendable. There is long history of the wolves eating their own when they are old, when the time is ripe, and especially when they are in danger and need to sacrifice for the greater cause.
As such, this film is a NWO concept, containing many points of disinformation, including the support of the build up of globalist power by us such stories as the Pinochet case. That man, actually a savior of his nation Chile from Communism planned by the CFR, and the only military leader to voluntarily give up power to an elected government once having seized it from the communist dictator who was planning the destruction of all the congress down their... by murder. Though that is a story of dis-information all of it's own, nevertheless the story of the communist supporting Spanish judge trying to issue warrents against a forigner while he was in England, and that government acting upon them, is a black mark for freedom and totally in support of the NWO!
That this film praises such, while at the same time exposing Kissinger, should be huge cause for warning bells going off in our heads. The NWO is getting desparate and is starting to sacrifice their own to gain the false trust of the liberty movement!

To learn of Kissinger's heavy involvement with the Rockefellers, put through Harvard for grooming, one only need to search the archives of www.thenewamerican.com ... try this link:

Kissinger was first a German born US Army Sargent in WWII, caught spying for the NKVD (KGB), then over the years magically transformed into Harvard baby and into the service of the Rockefeller's and the NWO.

Bottom line is I do not trust this film... but the ramifications of it's production may be huge!

Below is a short snippet from an article showing his cover-up of the knowledge of Arafat's ordering the murder of the US Ambassador.

"In 1973, Arafat’s Black September terrorists stormed the Saudi Arabian embassy in Khartoum, taking U.S. Ambassador Cleo Noel, U.S. Charges d’Affaires George Moore, and Belgian diplomat Guy Eid hostage. The following day they brutally tortured and executed all three men. Arafat feigned innocence — and the U.S. government feigned belief in his innocence.

Deception of this sort is to be expected of a terrorist. However, far more reprehensible and shocking is the fact that the U.S. government and other Western governments gave credence to this charade for decades, even though they had proof it was a lie. In the case of the Khartoum operation, for example, we had ironclad proof that Arafat had ordered the murder of our officials.

For years, James J. Welsh, a National Security Agency analyst, had been trying to force this fact into the open. Welsh had been the NSA’s Palestinian analyst who intercepted Arafat’s voice transmission specifically ordering the execution after the hostage takeover. However, apparently under the orders of Henry Kissinger, then President Nixon’s National Security Adviser (and soon to be secretary of state), the existence of the tapes and transcripts of Arafat’s order were kept secret.

Through successive U.S. administrations, as Arafat and the PLO were elevated to new heights of respectability, the secrecy surrounding Arafat’s guilt in the Khartoum murders was maintained. It was not until 33 years later that the truth was finally admitted."

(from: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/857)

Beware of these articles... they will become more prevalent as the NWO looses their grip... as the liberty movement spreads it's 'power through knowledge' over the electorate, especially in the universities, where they are already loosing the grip once held by NWO professors.

Time is of the essence... the grassroots needs to go into the precincts now! Use the KISS principle, and show them the reason for their pain, then throw out the incumbents! Getting bogged down with these complex expose's will confuse and drive them back to whomever is on the ballot voting, rather than throw out who ever was on the ballot last time!

"Suspicion is a Virtue, if in the interests of the good of the people." Patrick Henry

"We are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of Nature has placed in our power... the battle, sir, is not to the strong alone - it is to the

Ouch. This is horrendous

I have heard some true hate expressed for HK but now I have seen some of the reasons. I personally find his thick accent disgusting and wonder why a foreigner is ruling our country totally unelected. Death will take this swinging lump of garbage but his little minions will have to be dealt with.

Watched it and was shocked.

Watched it and was shocked. What a manipulative, cunning, evil, @#$%er! The guy was playing people every which way and laughing all the way to the top--all the while helping to slaughter millions of innocent people. I knew he was rotten but the real story is much worse.

To me it seems that American leaders easily bow down to smart, white men from Europe with thick accents--similar to what the Japanese do to Americans. (Make note of this Europeans: if power is what your crave then head on over to the US and will make you an "expert" on foreign policy--just put on your resume that you survived something.)

Lastly, the guy was a swinger??? LOL! That creeps me out. It's almost like he did it just because he had to prove something. I'll bet the guy doesn't even like women. Probably gets more of a thrill out of a roadkill....

Guess who else worked for Kissinger? Geithner.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/magazine/17china-t.html?_r=1

He [Geithner] then spent three years at Kissinger Associates, working with Brent Scowcroft, the future national security adviser, and helping Henry Kissinger write chapters on China and Japan for one of his books. From there, he joined the Treasury Department and began a meteoric rise through the bureaucracy.

Thanks Michael for another piece of the puzzle

I'v allways liked thriller's and Detective movies/books. Seem's I'v found myself living in one of the scarest one's anyone could of imagined.

Be careful

Christopher Hitchens is one of the "religion is the root of all evil" crowd. I have nothing against atheists in general, but the extreme atheist movement that claims "belief in God is a form of mental illness" and "raising one's children in a religion is a form of child abuse" is very dangerous. It rejects the concept of sin and allows its believers to justify any type of behavior in the name of their cause. The most violent and brutal regimes in history have been those under atheist leaders.

I understand your concerns

I understand your concerns about christopher hitchen...I used to be a big fan of his writings earlier however after receiving much acknowledgment of his in depth research he just changed...

he became aggressive in his beliefs...the debate between him and george galloway (british MP) which is on you tube is interesting and george aptly puts him in place

There is the good and the bad

about religion. Depends on what part he is talking about. You definitely cannot support religion without some discretion now. I am Christian, but I am not religious. I sympathize with atheists who cannot get it right because Religions are speaking more loudly than pure Christians these days.

Spirituality is good

religion mostly not so

Sure

But I consider my own religious training as a youth to be a gift, even though I don't currently practice that religion.

Ya, Hitchens is wrong on that imo

I think the initiation of coercion is the root of most evil, not religion.
But, I do agree with Hitchens in rejecting the concept of "sin". I think it's retarded.

I think Ayn Rand had a good critique of it:

"(The Doctrine of Original Sin) declares that (man) ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge - he acquired a mind and became a rational being. It was the knowledge of good and evil - he became a moral being/ He was sentenced to earn his bread by his labor - he became a productive being. He was sentenced to experience desire - he acquired the capacity of sexual enjoyment. The evils for which (the preachers) damn him are reason, morality, creativeness joy - all the cardinal values of his existence."

There's a difference

between "original sin" and "sin" in general. Ayn Rand is not condoning the murders of freedom loving individuals who oppose a totalitarian regime.

I believe organized

religion is the problem. There's nothing wrong in believing in God and the bible.

I just have a problem when both are used to solicit money, Then religion becomes a business. A tax exempt business. And that is what I have a problem with. That and when they cross over from religion into politics.

I don't get that

Are you saying that religions should be taxed?
Shouldn't you be opposed to taxation? Taxation is theft.

Yeah

I don't get that either.

A few lessons from this video.

America attacks vietnam, cambodia. They are the victim. But give them a chance, and they turn into monsters in the exact same way. Same for indonesia.

Until society develops a way to "filter out" the very intelligent, very determined and very psychopathic people who aspire to power, these events will continue to occur (see afghanistan, gaza, iraq, pakistan).

Unfortunately it does not seem like things will change any time soon - this is human nature.

Suddenly, that asteroid seems to have a much friendlier face.

Further comments

And as someone has noted, an international criminal court is an institution that can be hijacked just like all trans-national entities are now controlled and used for opposite goals.

It seems to me that beyond the human tragedy here, there is a mathematical inevitability in such events. It is given by the fact that to protect innocents, protect life - in other words, fight for good, you have to stop doing what you're doing, stop getting ahead in life in monetary and lifestyle terms. And do good.

Good doesn't pay. Evil pays. Therefore, Evil will always win. As it has on its side the will to power of mankind.

Well

Will to Excellence > Will to Power

It is foolish to assume that good does not pay. FALSE.
_________________________________

My liberty-minded home base of thought:

www.ponderthis.net

_________________________________

Freedom - Peace - Prosperity

I would disagree with you both

I remember that line in the movie Gandhi, where he says that good always prevails over evil. The thought that popped into my mind immediately was, "no it doesn't." It kind of strikes me as saying something like, "summer always prevails over winter." Which is true, until winter takes its turn prevailing over summer.

And on the cycle goes. It seems that they take turns - reigns of good and evil. They fight back and forth, as they're represented in the yin yang. Dark vs. light, night vs. day, evil vs. good.

There was very little place for men like Kissinger back at the time of the first Revolution. Now they are embraced as heroes by the power structures.

One day the tide again will shift, and movies like this, and people like Ron Paul help lead the way for light to prevail once again over darkness.

Depends on your definition of good.

universal constant of Karma always wins in the 4 dimension. It's the whole matter vs anti-matter argument.. well truth, what ever that may be, be told.

You can't have one without the other.

Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/

Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Only good can win in the end

One of the things we have been conditioned to believe is that all men are born equal. The truth is that just like species develop over time we as humans develop over time. Some are way ahead and some are way behind. We have difficulty in believing how evil some leaders can be but there is nothing strange about this. They are simply human beings who are less developed. Like most people thousands of years ago they havent developed compassion and cant feel guilt. On the contrary killing weeker beings is seen as strengt and right. We need to understand that compassionate loving people are humans at a higher development and as time goes by all humans will develop into loving beings.

define good.

please.

Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/

Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Good = love

oops

wrong spot

This was very informative, but only scratched the surface

Henry Kissinger was the architect of China's one-child policy -- a diabolically clever way to get your perceived enemy to enfeeble itself by killing off billions of it's own posterity over the course of a generation or two. Kissingers carrot to the Chinese was our manufacturing jobs.

Also, I only heard one mention that Kissinger was a Rockefeller lackey. Seems to me that sliding over this fact is very odd ... the proverbial elephant in the room. Everything Kissinger was about had to do with bringing on the NWO for his bosses. He was surely taking orders from behind the scenes the whole time, so no wonder justice never caught up with him.

It will, however.

Speaking of China's "one-child" policy,

it seems to me that it has been an abject failure, as their population since the policy was enacted has grown from around one billion to 1.3 billion. So not only has their poplulation NOT gone down, but has increased! How could this have happened if the one-child policy was being enforced in any way at all?

I have never seen this issue addressed!

It doesn't make any sense, does it?

If every 2 people are only producing 1 child, the population would have to go down..I'm curious to know why it didn't.