0 votes

Is Michael Badnariks' Constitution Class (as seen on YouTube) "biased"?

Seeking your opinions here:

1. Regardless of how much you personally like the class, do YOU think that Mr. Badnarik's class is patently biased either for or against any certain political party?

2. Do you think that the AVERAGE AMERICAN would think that Mr. Badnarik's class is patently biased either for or against any certain political party?

3. If you answered yes to either of the previous questions, can you suggest a way to make a course that would NOT be perceived as politically biased?

In case you haven't seen it, here's a link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpUXGOqO1r0 (I found it to be a pretty good primer on the Constitution.)

Jack Pelham
Rule of Law Revolution
www.ruleoflawrevolution.com

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I have watched Badnarik's

I have watched Badnarik's class several times and as he says, " I don't care who you vote for, just don't vote republican or democrat." which makes me think he is well informed as to how corrupt both sides of the aisle are. I feel his entire interest is in educating the public on the constitution and i very much appreciate him for doing so.

You are really good

at asking questions without giving a clue why you are asking. Do YOU think the class is biased? Apparently. I had not thought about it. Now I will have to go watch again in that light. The way to present an unbiased class is to specifically do a class with that intent in mind. If he is biased, then he could do it without bias. Most Libertarians are the least biased people around.

LLL, the reason....

...I ask that way is that I'm trying not to taint the question itself. I want the question to be as neutral to the guy who thinks Mr. Badnarik is biased as to the guy who thinks he is not.

The reason I'm interested in this is that I'm currently researching methods of teaching the Constitution to the masses in the most non-biased and politically-neutral and non-threatening way possible. This is why I was curious on people's take on Mr. Badnarik's class---as well as their best guess as to what others would think.

I watched it for the first time last week and did not find it deeply partisan. It *is* fairly "biased" in one sense: that he has very firm opinions about the meaning and about the current state of things. In other words, he has already drawn a lot of conclusions, where the average American hasn't even read the document for the first time. I do not fault him for that, mind you. But what I AM wondering about is whether there's a way to teach that class without so much conviction.

But please don't misunderstand me. I do NOT think his convictions are wrong. Rather, I'm simply WONDERING how the average American joe will take him. Will they see him as an extremist BECAUSE he has deep convictions? Is it too much all at one time? How might they respond differently to Mr. Spock if he were teaching instead?

These are the kinds of questions I'm plowing through. His class is great, but I'd like to know if there's a way that's even greater. I'm working on an hypothesis, but would like to get as much feedback as possible to this present question first.

Jack Pelham
Rule of Law Revolution
www.ruleoflawrevolution.com

If you're sucking air

Badnarik's class is for you.

***
Freedom is not: doing everything you want to.
Freedom is: not having to do what you don't want to do.
~ Joyce Meyer

Freedom is not: doing everything you want to.
Freedom is: not having to do what you don't want to do.
~ Joyce Meyer