Jekyll Island Project Media Blackout; Bob Schulz Refuses Press Coverage

Again WTP is after money from the liberty movement, and at the same time creating a total non-event distraction which has zero power or constitutional authority! It is a plain money raiser for WTP, to help with his other 'lost' cases and issues, most of which resources are used for defense, the precious funding usually going into the coffers of the left wing ACLU attorney Mark Lane!

Frankly, the true allegiance of WTP to the liberty movement, is called into question... it is an odd and self centered organization it appears, and bears watching before leaping!

It does not focus on Ron Paul's projects, but attempts to fight battles where there is no issue supported constitutionally, such as trying to force congress to respond to him! Of course Congress does not HAVE to respond... imagine if every one of the thousands of petitions required response. This was never intended by the founders in that sense. This can be a distraction and confusion to new people in the liberty movement.

WTP founder friendships with the Rockefeller family should be clarified, along with his support of an open Constitutional Convention, which he pushed more than a decade ago already. I am suspicious of his true motives. He did not really support Paul, but ... Schulz, and where he inters into cases, bad law is created. He has co-opted others material without permission, and used other famous names to promote his money drives for meetings... there are a few others who shamelessly do this also! He is not alone.

Beware that you do not get sucked in for your whole wallet.
------------------------------------------------------------------

"Suspicion is a Virtue, if in the interests of the good of the people." Patrick Henry

"We are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of Nature has placed in our power... the battle, sir, is not to the strong alone - it is to the

From: EdwinVieira
to bob@givemeliberty.org
date Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:13 PM
subject Report of Jekyll Island Conference

Bob:
Just for the record--I was not "in absentia" at the recent Jekyll Island conference, as reported
by you in your e-mail on the subject. That term implies that one is an attendee who simply could
not show up, for one reason or another. I was not an attendee, but merely sent you a statement of
my approval of "the Continental Congress idea", provided that it was conducted according to certain
standards, which I set out in some detail. That, and only that, is the extent of my approval.
Obviously, I do NOT necessarily support whatever was discussed or decided at the Jekyll Island
conference, as I had no part in the discussions, deliberations, or decision-making. If people want
to know my position on any of the issues ventilated at the conference, they must consult me
directly, and not assume that any conclusions stated by the conference attendees reflect my
position.
Thanks for keeping this clarification in mind in the future.
EdwinVieira
to bob

8:41 PM (20 hours ago)
Follow up message

Reply from Edwin Vieira to Bob :

Fine, you are quite correct. I presume then that you are in agreement that I was not present "in
absentia", let alone "in praesentia", or in animo, at the conference, and therefore should not be
listed among the "leaders" who participated there or are or will be participating in future
activities on behalf of the Continental Congress. I do not appreciate having my name listed among
participants in projects in which I did not participate and am not participating, and as to which
my non-participation was made clear before any participation by actual participants.
I presume that you will make the appropriate amendations in your internet report on the Jekyll
Island conference, with respect to the removal of my name from the peculiarly prominent position it
was given in the original list of "leaders", or for that matter from any such position.
Thank you.