0 votes

Remotely activated CYANIDE inside NEW implantable RFID GPS tracking CHIPS !!!

Remotely releasable CYANIDE inside NEW implantable GPS tracking RFID CHIPS !!!
Fox & CNBC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGO8zc5DDw4

The INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas: cyanide poison inside RFID implantable microchips = ultimate control killer chip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axDlUNYB5IE

HD FOX NEWS Version: Cyanide-equipped RFID chip! Patent Denied in Germany
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmZmrVLdaTY



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If it's on YouTube, it MUST be true!

YouTube is nothing but a giant propaganda machine. You can find an alarmist video to convince someone of just about anything on there. When all I see to back up some extraordinary claim is some link to a YouTube video, I dismiss the claim as B.S. If there is some real tangible evidence, post the link to something other than a highly biased fear mongering YouTube video.

Post REAL sources, or it's not true.

EDIT: I see someone posted a link to an old story below. Interesting. My original post above still stands for 90% of the fear-mongering crap that people post on here though.

It's a good policy

How many times have I clicked on a youtube and it was just some guy talking to a web cam? If it were at least important enough to type up, I would be more likely to follow a new issue. I wouldn't expect you to click on every youtube out there just because the topic seems urgent anymore than I'd expect you to open every email with an urgent-sounding subject line.

Defend Liberty!

Exactly

Too many posts here have a simple alarmist subject title, with nothing in the comment section but some YouTube video link. That's when I skip it and just go on to the next post. Write something, a summary or just a few sentences at least. I don't blindly click on a video link without that. And you're right, it's always some dude who just talks into the camera, or something with scary music and scrolling quotes, etc. Funny stuff! Propaganda lives!

Just because you don't want to believe it, it doesn't make it BS

If there's one thing the last couple years have taught anyone, it's 'listen to the conspiracy theorists'. We actually lost members here over chemtrails, or chaff-laden contrails as the Air Force calls them. But it turns out that even though all those people didn't want to beleive it, it was still true. Don't be so damn naive.

Damn naive?

And just because you believe it, or want to believe it, doesn't mean it's true.

I already said, before you all posted your replies that I saw the link and read the article.

Sure, at least consider alternative views, but most of these alarmist YouTube videos are propaganda/fear mongering. I'm surprised many "enlightened ones" here actually believe anything that blows their way. That's being "damn naive."

ok....

Will the origional article from Germany be enough for you.. or do you want to be standing there with the patent in hand when they reject it?

http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20090515-19313.html

This is old news... I had thought everyone already knew it.

But the macabre innovation that enables remote killing will likely be denied copyright protection.

“While the application is still pending further paperwork on his part, the invention will probably be found to violate paragraph two of the German Patent Law – which does not allow inventions that transgress public order or good morals,” spokeswoman Stephanie Krüger told The Local from Munich.

The patent application – entitled “Implantation of electronic chips in the human body for the purposes of determining its geographical location” – was filed on October 30, 2007, but was only published until last week, or 18 months after submission as required by German law, she said.

“In recent times the number of people sought by security forces has increased,” the Jeddah-based inventor wrote in his summary.

The tiny electronic device, dubbed the “Killer Chip” by Swiss daily Tagesanzeiger, would be suited for tracking fugitives from justice, terrorists, illegal immigrants, criminals, political opponents, defectors, domestic help, and Saudi Arabians who don’t return home from pilgrimages.

I've no idea why you would call it fear-mongering crap tho... it is just reality. Which sometimes it is in your best interest to be informed about... :)

~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~

?

I already said, before you all posted your replies that I saw the link and read the article.

There were nothing but YouTube links to back up the subject line. I don't watch YouTube videos for "proof" as they're mostly propaganda or at least very slanted, complete with scary music and scrolling quotes and tag lines.

patents do not require

working prototypes. I think it would be much more difficult to do this than you might think.

some Issues are - The amount of poison needed, how it would be delivered ( either the RFID device would be intravenous, and thus really small, or under the skin, and thus not be able to deliver the poison as easily. I don't think it is impossible, just difficult.

The real danger with these things is the possibility that the people with the RFID device would not know it is deadly, since already similar large devices have been used - most notably in Erie PA, where a man was fitted with an explosive collar, linked to a cell phone. The cell phone went off, and Ka boom. It would be easy to fit peole with an ankle bracelet type device that would do the same thing.

Cool

I'll just get the patent for myself. I'll make it so it could deliver a variety of substances so I can pretend I want to use it to deliver grandpa his heart medicine in a pinch. Then, I just won't make any.

Defend Liberty!

Why is it always the short timers who chime in...

on the CT stuff telling us how ridiculous and wingnutty such talk is?

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

Short timer, cute.

I didn't realize you had to be in the clique to post here.

I already said, before you all posted your replies that I saw the link and read the article.

I still stand by my YouTube propaganda statement though.

By the way, have you seen my YouTube video that I just posted about how the oxygen we breathe causes cancer? You'd better stop breathing oxygen....just watch my YouTube video and you will be amazed! Remember, if it's on YouTube, it's TRUE!

Here is a "printed" story with confirmation of the technology

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=94070&sectionid=351020604

But why is this coming up again now?

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

hmm, Sounds improbable

You need 2 or 3 drops of Cyanide to kill someone. Imagine the size of 3 drops of water. It seems unlikely you could implant that in someone's veins.

For me

the first and last of the above videos will not come up and the middle one is from May, 2008 near as I can tell.

Both

The first and the last link you've provided have been removed by YouTube. The infowar link still works . . . for now.

Blessings )o(

Blessings )o(

My dog died

and we went out for a new pup, guess what you cant get a dog unless it is chipped now. How do you get them removed?

too late now

You get your dogs off craigslist, and tell the shelters you will not support them because they insist on chipping animals, which causes cancer in them.

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

Chipping animals causes cancer?

I would like to see some legitimate documentation on that!

Forget how to run a search engine?

http://www.petdogblog.com/do-animal-computer-chip-implants-c...

You are on a COMPUTER. It has access to these tube things called "the intenets."

One quick search found this. I did my digging down this bunny hole without any help at all, you are welcome for the head start.

Is that how you seek truth? If you do not already know something to be true, you require someone prove it to you before you bother to check into it yourself?

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

paul4won, excuuuuuuuuse me!

I just asked for some LEGITIMATE documentation of your claim.

The point is

many of the long time members here, get tired of spoonfeeding the "toddlers", that demand proof, when they have the same resources at hand that we do.
It's called research, and requires a little bit of work. Do the research, and come to your own conclusion. Don't take my word, Alex Jones' word, Paul4won's word, or anyones for that matter. Find the truth for yourself.
Every time I see a post like this, I think of a toddler in a high chair, demanding some mashed carrots.

★★★★★★
http://www.documentarywire.com/
http://freedocumentaries.net/c/All/

I was giving you grief, humor does not type well

The thing about seeking truth was serious, though. And posted for the benefit of any who do that. Pet peeve: "Show me a link to that" as a reply always blows my mind...

edit: OK, I just noted legitimate was in all caps, so I take it you could not bother to click the hyperlink on the story I posted? Now I am rolling my eyes at you. If someone points you at a bunny hole, they give you the option of looking inside or not. I really cannot click every click for anyone but me.

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

paul4won,

why should it bother you if someone, when making an unsubstantiated statement,
is asked to substantiate their statement with a link to a LEGITIMATE site, verifying what they are stating?

After all, this IS the "intenet" (your word). One can easily find some place that agrees with what they believe to be true.

Again, excuuuuuse me, but I choose to not accept that chipping animals causes cancer!

Roll your eyes, if you wish - that is your prerogative.

doesn't everything

doesn't pretty much Everything cause cancer?

http://www.scorecard.org/health-effects/chemicals.tcl?short_...

http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/cancer%20list.htm

All it takes is a trigger, and every Body is different.

You choose not to accept? That's gotta be handy.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09...
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/11/technology/11micro.html?_r...
That's 2 friggin minutes of asking thequestion, "really?"
I'm not 100% sold, but there seems to be some real evidence that something is up. Enough that my dog won't be getting chipped. You do zero research and you have the nerve to question 9-11 truth? Wow. Proves my point about from-the-hip naysayers.

Mike Lawson,

quote:
"You do zero research and you have the nerve to question 9-11 truth? "

What the hell is that about?

We are talking about chipping animals here!

You've done it again.

Have another cup of coffee!

Excuse me for butting in Mike

but, I said the EXACT same thing on the chemtrail thread.

I provided you senate bills, International Treaties, and did I get any thanks? Of course not. You just ran with your tail between your legs.

You ARE too lazy to do your own research, and then come into a thread where people are having an intelligent discussion, and make snide condescending remarks. It gets old after a while.

rhino is a perfect example, of pouring hours of spoonfeeding info to someone, with zero results. If you want to find truth on something then do your own work. It is much more satisfying.

★★★★★★
http://www.documentarywire.com/
http://freedocumentaries.net/c/All/

You choose not to accept? Did you do any digging?

I choose to seek truth. But whatever. The research is what it is, but you can certainly "choose" to ignore it.

I choose not accept that the Federal Reserve exists. How is that going to pan out for me do you suppose?

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

paul4won, yes I choose to NOT accept

your statement as a FACT!

I am free to do so!