0 votes

ANY CALIFORNIA Law Enforcement Officers here?

I have a few questions regarding the CVC and its applicability.

Im wondering if you are informed that the California Vehicle Code ONLY applies to State and Local Govt. Employees??

This is because the STATE OF CALIFORNIA is a corporation (Standard and Poors Corporation Index), and therefore may only make rules that apply to the employees of that corporation.

This is true of ALL corporations.

GM for example, cant make their employee handbook apply to non employees.

The proof is found in CVC 21052, CVC 4155, CVC 17459, CVC 17460, CVC 12801.5(e)

SEE:
"The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice."- Davis v. Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22, 24.

"Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." - Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." - Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

"...those things which are considered as inalienable rights which all citizens possess cannot be licensed since those acts are not held to be a privilege." City of Chicago v. Collins, 51 N.E. 907, 910

"Illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. This can only be obviated by adhering to the rule that constitutional provisions for the security of persons and property should be liberally construed." Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635 (1884); Exparte Rhodes, 202Ala. 68 71.

"The State cannot diminish rights of the people." Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516

"Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void." Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Never the less they will

Never the less they will still subject you to thier rules at the point of a gun if necassary despite all the legal mumbo jumbo so essentially you are a slave to thier rule like it or not.

-----
Get Prepared!
Only dead fish go with the flow...

-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!

Get Prepared!

meekandmild's picture

Anytime you sign your name

on driver's license, traffic tickets, checks, any licenses, permits, anything with your signature sign it "without prejudice UCC1-207".

When you use "without prejudice UCC 1-207" in connection with your signature, you are saying, "I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement."

http://www.landrights.com/UCC_1-207.htm

http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:mv1pVTb0QdwJ:www.consti...

note: UCC 1-207 was changed

note: UCC 1-207 was changed to 1-308 in 2004 just to make it more confusing!

Not in this state -

According to the Human Resources Department and the Office of the Notary Public at the Secretary of State of the State of California there are no "CALIFORNIA Law Enforcement Officers" as such due to non-filing of the mandated Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution. Any alleged officer is acting purely in their private, not governmental, capacity involving the enforcement of the California Vehicle Code. Said officer's bonding agent does not extend liability to those operating under color of law as the office has been vacated under the thrust of Government Code 1303 and 1770(i).

sounds

about right