Barry Jennings - The Ultimate Smoking-Gun of 9/11?
.
I would request that this thread be kept - AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE - to analyzing only the Barry Jennings testimony/ABC News interview.
There are hundreds of threads on these forums with endless name-calling and bickering about various other 9/11 topics.
I request that all interactions in this thread be kept to only Barry Jennings.............but it's ONLY a request.....as I have no power to stop anyone from doing or saying anything else.
Having said that, I would like to make several points as to why I believe that this may end up being the ULTIMATE smoking-gun to the whole 9/11 nightmare.
First off, here's the OFFICIAL ABC interview of him emerging from the chaos just after being rescued from WTC-7:
Barry Jennings - 9/11 Early Afternoon ABC 7 Interview
Therefore, it's a PROVEN fact that he was rescued from that building LONG before it collapsed at around 5:20 pm
Now here's Dylan Avery's and Jason Bermas' uncut interview with Barry Jennings. By the way, as most of you know, Barry died last year from still-uknown causes in his early-50s.
Can someone who is a 9/11 skeptic please explain how Barry Jennings and Michael Hess were trapped by explosions in WTC-7 BEFORE either of the Twin Towers collapsed?
No name-calling is needed in this thread.
I just want a reasonable explanation as to how this is possible.
Why would a private investigator tell Dylan Avery to......
.
....never contact him again regarding Barry Jennings' death, and that it's a police matter?
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
I'm thirsting for more Barry Jennings commentary
.
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
"All this time I'm hearing explosions"
.
.....says Barry Jennings.
If it was the towers collapsing, that would have only been 2 explosions 30 minutes apart - IF those could even be considered explosions from his vantage point.
"All this time I'm hearing explosions" is pretty damning in my book.
He was very adamant that both towers fell AFTER the landing gave way on the 6th floor, although I agree there was a statement he made that he didn't clarify when he said "gone".
He CLEARLY states, before they made him clarify, that he was trapped in there when both buildings came down.
He stated that when he looked down and "saw cars and busses on fire, and the he looked one way, the building was there, and I looked the other way, it was gone".
I believe I just figured-out what he meant by that.
I sincerely believe he was saying that part of WTC-7 was already GONE from explosions on that side of the building and at that level.
I SWEAR that's what he means at that point.
He could not see the Twin Towers from his perspective, and that's why he said he had no way of knowing they had collapsed when the emergency workers fled from trying to rescue them on both occasions....so therefore, when he said "gone", he was NOT referring to the Twin Towers, but to part of WTC-7.
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
An objective look at the interview
Would have to say that he was a bit confused about the time line.
1. He did not know when the 2nd plane hit - he was inside and could not hear it ? ?
2. went to the 6th floor, there was an explosion, had to go back to the 8th floor, broke out the window, and when he looked the one tower was gone.
3. Later he said that the explosion was before either tower fell, but he did not look out, so he did not see the tower fall. he mentions something about the policemen running away, but the part of the interview is very unclear. He doesn't even mention what it was like in the building when the towers fell, though he must have noticed it - we know that there was some damage to building 7 when the towers fell.
4. the interviewer is suggesting answers, for example, the explosion coming from beneath him - good objective interviewing would have included the interviewer in the shot, so we could see any body language as well. note that even though he said that the explosion was up, he said the lobby looked like king kong 'stepped"on it - indicating downward force.
5. To me another odd thing is that he heard explosions, went home, and much later WTC fell - if this was controlled demo the explosions should have been around the time the building fell, not four hours before it fell. It would be odd to do half of the demo, wait a few hours, then do the rest ? ?
This is no smoking gun.
I do feel sorry for Mr. Jennings and his family, he went through a horrendous experience, and untimely death.
Thank you, ironman for the points
.
Those are, indeed, valid points.
However, I'm re-watching the interview right now and I've come upon the point where he says they (Hess and Jennings) were in the stairwell and when they got to the 6th floor, Jennings said the landing gave-way - there was an explosion - he was left there hanging.
Ok, so let's just ask the question, is it POSSIBLE this could have been the first tower falling and hitting WTC-7?
Well, as we all know, WTC-2 - the South Tower - the furthest from WTC-7 - fell first.
Would the South Tower's debris have caused the landing he and Mr. Hess were on to give way and sound/feel like an explosion?
Of course, this is assuming it happened as a result of one of the towers collapsing at that time................I have serious doubts about that........and I continue watching now..........
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
would it cause the landing to give way ?
Hard to say, but it would have been noticible.
remember the seismograph readings, the ground and building must have shaken considerably.
Here is a vid from said to be WTC7 after WTC 2 fell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZCbc0FgyKQ
Seems damaged, lots of windows blown out - would a landing colapsed ? I don't know, it does seem unlikely - it would have had to be a lucky hit. it might also depend on what he means by "collapsed" - it may have been impassable. I would bet there was a big gush of air coming up the stairwells when wtc2 collapsed.
Explosions in WTC7
& the OEM abandoned.
Game over for the bullshit. Let's clean this Country up.
RIP Mr Barry Jennings , You died for the truth :(
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Live like you mean it ..... Your life is your own !
http://www.randpaul2010.com
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !
This deserves a
bump. Thank you for this interview, it was very interesting. Keep up the great work.
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must. like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.-Thomas Paine
The R3volution requires action, not observation!!!!
Let's go ahead and assume the timeline of Barry Jennings' story
.
If Barry Jennings' story is true - and Michael Hess seems to corraborate this - what does it mean?
What does it mean that he and Mr. Hess were almost killed by bombs going off in WTC-7 BEFORE either of the Twin Towers collapsed?
Does this point to al-qaeda..........or.............?
Just asking questions......that's all.
Another interesting item, towards the end of the interview with Barry Jennings on the "uncut" video, he mentioned also being interviewed by News 12.
Where on earth is THAT interview, I wonder?
I bet they heard his story and finally realized he was referring to WTC 7 and they buried that interview BELOW the Hudson River...........or poured thermate all over it.
That footage collapsed into the garbage-can at free-fall speed into its own filmprint.
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
I'm not trying to provoke fights/name-calling.........but.....
.
....I wonder why the Barry Jennings situation usually leaves those who believe the official story SILENT.
Could Barry Jennings be the achilles-heel of those who are trying to protect the official conspiracy theory?
Again, I WELCOME explanations of the Barry Jennings testimony and news interview.
Where are the explanations?
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
No its just timing
Of course if there were many responses you would say - look at all the trolls, they must be paid disinfo people - this is an important part of the story or there wouldn't be so many people trying to discredit it. regardless of what happens, you have an explanation that will back up to your opinion.
Ironman, I promise I won't throw the 'troll' term around....
.
...or any other type of name-calling.
I am truly fascinated with this aspect of the 9/11 story and I want to see if there are any holes in it.
If someone can identify any holes in the Barry Jennings story, please step forward.
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
You said absolutely nothing
with that response.
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
oruval - 911 is a religion with you
So its pointless to try to discuss it with you.
Suffice it to say I would like another independent investigation, just like you.
But I would be willing to have someone other than alex jones do the investigation, I doubt if you would.
.
great informative threads deserve bumps
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."
-- Patrick Henry
Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
"How can we justify to the unemployed and underemployed in the United States the incredible cost of maintaining a global empire?" - Dr. Ron Paul
Dylan Avery on Jack Blood concerning Barry Jennings' death
.
Several months back, Dylan Avery gave this update regarding the death of Barry Jennings on the Jack Blood Show.
The private investigator Dylan Avery hired quit the investigation into Barry's death and pretty much told Dylan to stay away from him. Evidently, the investigator ran into some scary roadblocks.
Here's the audio of this interview. (get the slider and move it to the 10:10 mark):
Dylan Avery discusses death of Barry Jennings on Jack Blood Show
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
thanks for posting
a great interview
---------------------------------
"The essence of freedom is the proper limitation of government". ~ Founding Fathers
----------------------------------
"The essence of freedom is the proper limitation of government". ~ Founding Fathers
Giuliani's reason to vacate WTC7.
This might help answer the question raised by Galileo in the last paragraph of his earlier post....
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/category/911-investigations/
What happened to
Hess? Is he still alive and can he collaborate the story?
--------
Fossils Rock!
'Cause there's a monster on the loose
That's a great question
.
I just found this.
Here's the youtube audio interview with Michael Hess on News9 regarding him and Barry Jennings being trapped in WTC 7:
Michael Hess, WTC7 explosion witness
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
minor correction?
Barry said he was 52 in the interview, if he died last year he would have been pushing 60, not "early-50s" as you mention above.
Very interesting interviews. I had a couple of questions pop into mind listening to this... if you're in a stairwell and there's an explosion, how do you know whether the explosion came from below or above, and how do you get blown back up to the 8th floor without getting crushed? That part is hard for me to imagine.
--------
Fossils Rock!
'Cause there's a monster on the loose
"Key Witness to WTC 7 Explosions Dead at 53"
.
Here's an article by Aaron Dykes:
Key Witness to WTC 7 Explosions Dead at 53
For what it's worth.
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
right, my bad
The interview where he said he was 52 was in 07, I thought it was soon after 9-11. My mistake.
--------
Fossils Rock!
'Cause there's a monster on the loose
I realize someone can simply say that....
.
...Barry's testimony and his interview on ABC could be lies or he was "shaken" and therefore "mistaken".
But really?
Can some of you really claim that?
Why would he mix Michael Hess into this equation if he were lying or mistaken?
What would his motivation be to lie?
IF Barry's testimony is true, there is no possible explanation other than everybody's worst nightmare.....and I think you all know what that is.
.
www.vaclib.org
.
.
www.vaclib.org
Thanks for posting.
I saw the Barry Jennings info on the other 9/11 thread and hoped it would get its own thread.
NIST exploring 9/11
NIST exploring 9/11 conspiracy theory for WTC-7 (2007)
New witness confirms Scholars previous findings
http://twilightpines.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=v...
Abstract: The National Institute for Standards and Technology appears to be moving in the direction of a conspiracy theory about the destruction of WTC-7. This comes as a new witness reports explosions inside the building early that morning, long before the building would be destroyed at 5:20 PM. This reinforces Scholars for 9/11 Truth previous finding that WTC-7 was a controlled demolition, which the government is trying to conceal.
....
Rolf Lindgren, former Vice-Chair of the Libertarian Party of Wisconsin and independent scholar of the events of 9/11, transcribed the testimony and edited it for clarity of English. The complete transcript is below. The witness went to WTC-7 after the first plane struck the North Tower and before the second hit the South Tower. When he arrived at the 23rd floor, he found half-eaten sandwiches and still-steaming coffee. He made some phone calls and was told to leave “right away.” Someone ran into the Center and led him to a stairwell. “When we reached the 6th floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way; there was an explosion and the landing gave way.” He had to climb back up to the 8th floor to find a way out. When he got to the lobby, “the lobby was totally destroyed. It looked like King Kong had come through and stepped on it.. And it was so destroyed I didn’t know where I was . . . (and) they had to take me out through a hole in the wall, . . . a hole that I believe the fire department made to get me out.”
....
Lindgren, who has extensive experience with press releases, added, “Friday afternoon is the best time of the week for the government to bury unpleasant news. Since NIST insists it has found ‘no evidence’ of a controlled demolition, it must not consider the videos of WCT-7’s collapse as ‘evidence,’ because they leave no room for doubt. The fires in Building 7 provide a good cover story to hide the fact that powerful explosives brought it down.” He is also not impressed with Giuliani’s excuse for not going to his command center, which is that another plane could have been headed for it. “But if another plane was headed toward the World Trade Center, then he should have directed that the firemen be removed from all the buildings, which he did not do.” (See http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=rudolf_(_rudy_)_giuliani ).
....
WTC 7 Eyewitness Testimony Transcribed by Rolf Lindgren (edited for clarity with notes)
Sources: http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/190607clips2.mp3
http://69.80.230.7/Archives2/Jun2007/gwrpt1erT/0619071.mp3
http://69.80.230.7/Archives2/Jun2007/gwrpt1erT/0619072.mp3
[Start of transcript]
http://twilightpines.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=v...
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for James Madison.