Home » Forums » Daily Paul Liberty Forum

0 votes

From Minarchism to Anarchism in Ten Easy Steps - A Guide for Constitutionalists

Submitted by gcopenhaver on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 19:03
in

Posted here: http://mises.org/Community/forums/t/8184.aspx

From Minarchism to Anarchism in Ten Easy Steps

A Guide for Constitutionalists

  1. The Public Sector, III: Police, Law, and the Courts - Murray Rothbard
  2. Police, Courts, and Laws – on the Market - David Friedman
  3. The Private Production of Defense - Hans Hoppe
  4. The Production of Security - Gustave de Molinari
  5. Chaos Theory - Robert Murphy
  6. No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority - Lysander Spooner
  7. Fallacies of the Public Goods Theory and the Production of Security - Hans Hoppe
  8. Market Anarchism As Constitutionalism - Roderick Long
  9. Do We Ever Really Get Out of Anarchy? - Alfred Cuzán
  10. Libertarian Anarchism: Responses to Ten Objections - Roderick Long (Audio)


»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How do we get there?

Submitted by Brit4RonPaul on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 21:31.

It is total waste of time to argue about the feasibility or desirability of a zero government world.

It is much more productive to ask: "How do we get there?"

Suddenly, all the bullshit hair-splitting theological arguments disappear. Then the practical politics begins.

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

If people don't think it's

Submitted by gcopenhaver on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 21:45.

If people don't think it's feasible (and it seems that most people don't), then "how" doesn't really matter, yet. Why would anyone care how to get to a "zero government world" when they want government?

Are you serious?

Submitted by Brit4RonPaul on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 22:07.

"If people don't think it's feasible (and it seems that most people don't), then "how" doesn't really matter, yet."

On the contrary, a world where no-one initiates force or steals sounds like paradise to me. Certainly no need for government in that eventuality.

One question: how do we get there?

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.

On the contrary, a world

Submitted by gcopenhaver on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 22:23.

On the contrary, a world where no-one initiates force or steals sounds like paradise to me.

I think you're the only one on this thread talking about some fantasy world where "no-one initiates force or steals". There will be people violating rights whether a government exists or not. The market will be able to handle this better than any government has, but most people don't think that's feasible.

b

Submitted by freespeech on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 21:09.

~peace

—

~peace

Some good articles

Submitted by hawkiye on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 20:39.

Some good articles there!

-----
Get Prepared!
Only dead fish go with the flow...

—

-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!

Get Prepared!

bump

Submitted by dabooda on Tue, 06/02/2009 - 23:19.

I second the motion. Gotta bookmark this, and work through the whole list.

—

Recommended reading: The Most Dangerous Superstition, http://www.larkenrose.com/store/34-books/2019-the-most-dange...