1 vote

Poll: OK...so let's see where our opinions fall on the whole 911 thing...with initial Tally as of 11pm June 11...

It is getting a little difficult to count but it looks like:

Tally Thus far: A-7 (with a few caveats) B-182

Curiosity is killing me. Since we are now back to spitting in each others coffee over this whole 9/11 thing, with some seriously worried about marginalization of themselves, or the liberty movement, through affiliation with people who doubt the government's story...let's find out who IS in the majority?

No need to editorialize or complain about the choices here. Just give a simple answer. For those that just can't help themselves and have to find a "C", understand that there is none. The Ron Paul "blowback" theory is an answer for the "why" question with regards to the official story and if you see things exactly like Ron purportedly does, then your answer is A.

You, like Ron Paul, are adhering to the explanation that 19 hijacker's and their Afghanistan based leadership were responsible for the devastation that day, fires were the cause of the collapse of the NY Buildings, Passengers attacking the hijacker's brought down the Shanksville plane and American Flt. 77, under the command of a hijacking team hit the Pentagon and last but not least, no "insider" conspiracy to plan and bring these events about existed. We are not polling motivation...we are not polling nor postulating alternative theory.

Just answer the question...

I'll keep the count and update each evening...

Vote:

A
I believe the government's explanation for the events of 9/11

B
I do not believe the government's explanation for the events of 9/11

VOTING B DOES NOT ALIGN OR COMMIT YOU TO A DINNER DATE WITH ANY SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE EVENTS OF 911. IT SIMPLY MEANS THAT YOU DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT YOU WERE TOLD ABOUT THAT DAY AS DEFINED ABOVE...PLAIN AND SIMPLE!



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I identify myself as

a 'Truther'- [B]

B

I vote B.

This poll means nothing.

Even mainstreamers aren't going to go for A much.

Defend Liberty!

Hmmm

"Even mainstreamers aren't going to go for A much."

Why not? It is the line of demarcation between wacko alternative theories and "mainstream thought". Mistakes are not lies, unless they really are. What I am curious about is how many people believe that there is a substantial divergence from the truth evidenced in the purported conclusions of the 911 commission.

There is nothing here that needs much thought. The answer goes right to your belief system. What I wanted to see was, how many of us here have a belief system that allows for altruism and good faith in the government with regards to its efforts to inform the people about 911.

It doesn't mean much, I'll give you that but so far it points to a rather lop-sided distrust and "may" alleviate fears that such thought is not mainstream acceptable now-a-days. Then again maybe it doesn't going back to the Metallica analogy below.

Still it provides food for thought as to what type of person involves himself here and whether or not certain topics are either relevant or not in the grand scheme of motivating action...whatever that action may be.

It seems that many were brought to Ron Paul BECAUSE of their awakening to the 911 anomalies. I know I was...yes even though Ron Paul has never expressed a like-mindedness on this subject, (other than a willingness to re-investigate) he was simply perceived as the most honest one of the bunch and his ideas agree with the paring of power from those that use it to their advantage and to the detriment of us all.

**“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” ~ Mark Twain **

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

While this poll is informal

While this poll is informal when a minority view goes mainstream that means plenty.

Maybe because...

Mainstreamers that believe the official story are now a minority?

Have been since this year...

~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~

A resounding "B"

It can't be...can it?

It can't be...can it?

B

9/11 is the thread that once pulled will unravel EVERYTHING.
The Federal Reserve
The Banksters
The Military Industrial Crime Cartel
The Chemical Producers
The Israeli Crime Syndicate
The Bush Empire
The Pharma Crime Syndicate
The IRS
And the Bilderbergers

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
World's Greatest Business
http://www.gbemembers.com/webintro.php?view=wmv

"The Number one reason people lose money is the FEAR of losing money." Sir John Templeton

trust DR PAUL

I trust the good DR PAUL, A for blow back
B----- for who's blow back !!!!!! 911 report lump of crap
I lean much further toward BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
plus the fact that metal doesn't turn molten until at least 2500 degrees,airplane fuel burns at 1200 -1500 degrees,once again WHO'S BLOW BACK !!!!!!!!!!

B

of course

B

No brainer.

Some congressman, honestly or not, recently mentioned that they have never heard of the collapse of building 7. Anybody ever asked RP if he has heard about, or better still, seen the collapse of B7? Why do people assume that congress is kept in the light about what is really going on? Lets face it, most have no clue about how money works. RP knows his economics and applies common sense to form foreign policy..but from what pool of pure intellect is the conspiracy over 9/11 going to spring from? Simply from supporters who politely ask him to take another look. And start with freefall collapse of B7 and the architects and engineers for 9/11 truth!

B

As stated previously, I am not a building expert nor an explosives' expert..
However, there are too many unanswered questions. A "new" investigation is in order, imo...

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond
BAN ELECTRONIC VOTING!!

I vote B

[b]12.160Mhz Social Network
Resisting the New World Order
http://tinyurl.com/12160mhz

Bio Watch :
http://snardfarker.ning.com/group/flu

Chat room
http://12160.chatango.com/
[b]

B.B.Because the Offical story is B.S.

"B"cause all these Questions were never answered!

- AWOL Chain of Commanda.
It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack - George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield - all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.

- Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation''s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?

- Wargames / Air Defense Failures
US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack - including multiple hijackings, suicide crash, bombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were "real world or exercise." Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an "inside job"?

- Demolition of WTC7
Proof from Larry...

- All the Signs of a Systematic 9/11 Cover-up
Airplane black boxes were found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were "disappeared" and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report.
US officials consistently suppressed and destroyed evidence (like the tapes recorded by air traffic controllers who handled the New York flights).
Whistleblowers (like Sibel Edmonds and Anthony Shaffer) were intimidated, gagged and sanctioned, sending a clear signal to others who might be thinking about speaking out.
Officials who "failed" (like Myers and Eberhard, as well as Frasca, Maltbie and Bowman of the FBI) were given promotions.

- Disposing of the Crime Scene
The rapid and illegal scrapping of the WTC ruins at Ground Zero disposed of almost all of the structural steel indispensable to any investigation of the collapse mechanics.

- Anthrax
Mailings of weapons-grade anthrax - which caused a practical suspension of the 9/11 investigations - were traced back to US military stock. Soon after the attacks began in October 2001, the FBI approved the destruction of the original samples of the Ames strain, disposing of perhaps the most important evidence in identifying the source of the pathogens used in the mailings. Were the anthrax attacks timed to coincide with the Afghanistan invasion? Why were the letters sent only to media figures and to the leaders of the opposition in the Senate (who had just raised objections to the USA PATRIOT Act)?

- Stonewall
Colin Powell promised a "white paper" from the State Department to establish the authorship of the attacks by al-Qaeda. This was never forthcoming, and was instead replaced by a paper from Tony Blair, which presented only circumstantial evidence, with very few points actually relating to September 11th.
Bush and Cheney pressured the (freshly-anthraxed) leadership of the Congressional opposition into delaying the 9/11 investigation for months. The administration fought against the creation of an independent investigation for more than a year.
The White House thereupon attempted to appoint Henry Kissinger as the chief investigator, and acted to underfund and obstruct the 9/11 Commission.
And so on....B, Because this Offical story is A COVERUP!

- Unanswered Questions and the "Final Fraud" of the 9/11 Commission:
The September 11th families who fought for and gained an independent investigation (the 9/11 Commission) posed 400-plus questions, which the 9/11 Commission adopted as its roadmap. The vast majority of these questions were completely ignored in the Commission hearings and the final report.
The membership and staff of the 9/11 Commission displayed awesome conflicts of interest. The families called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration member and close associate of "star witness" Condoleezza Rice, and were snubbed. Commission member Max Cleland resigned, condemning the entire exercise as a "scam" and "whitewash."
The 9/11 Commission Report is notable mainly for its obvious omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods - ignoring anything incompatible with the official story, banishing the issues to footnotes, and even dismissing the still-unresolved question of who financed 9/11 as being "of little practical significance."

SirRic

B

Because I don't believe the investigation was thorough enough thus how could you explain it properly.

Refreshing to see this tally ... as the trolls are out in force.

Discover Costa Rica

Discover Costa Rica

B

There's just too many things wrong with the government story. I still want to know where the money to fund this came from and how a passport survived and was found when even the black boxes were lost (even though someone reported them found) among about 100 more questions. On a side issue, I saw Glen Beck linking 911 truth to Al Qaeda and anti-semitism......is he nuts? What would the architects and engineers say to that? he is painting with a wide brush there, the same thing he was just against when the DHS released their report.

"Government spending cannot create additional jobs. If the government provides the funds required by taxing the citizens or by borrowing from the public, it abolishes on the one hand as many jobs as it creates on the other.", www.mises.org

"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com

B

(B is for bullsh*t)

“Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness.” - Mark Twain

since the 911 commission is

since the 911 commission is not an investigation (its a commission) its natural for various theories to be put forward . people should not be judged to harshly no matter which one they hold to . of course if you dont think explosives brought down the buildings your stupid. lol

that's a B

then..lol

Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/

Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Maybe do another better-conceived poll

With the vote tally being virtually unanimous, we haven't learned much.

A better 'A or B' question might ask about the controlled demolition issue only.

Even many people who still accept the basic line that 'hijacked jets alone did it,' do not accept OTHER parts of the govt. story, and so they would vote B in your poll as it stands.

I would much rather know how many in this forum grasp the simple physics problem here.

1truegospel.org

I'm learning that...

It is hard to find a non-wacko here...which is funny since there are some who want the wacko's to simmer down a bit and stop scaring people away.

Could it be that every wacko in the world has found their way here? Is it impossible to imagine that the wacko's are no longer in the minority in the greater population? Is there evidence of a tipping point in popular opinion...one that can no longer be silenced or controlled? Or, has it all ready been reached?

People "go with the crowd"...especially in the USA...and in this day of "free agency"...switching teams is the norm rather than an anomaly. I don't know what this says...but it sure is interesting.

**“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” ~ Mark Twain **

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

what is wacko

Is to unquestioningly believe the same information dissemination apparatus that gave us:

- The Gulf of Tonkin Farce (which led to the expansion of the Vietnam War)
- The lies related to the Lusitania (which led to U.S. entrance into WWI)
- The misinformation surrounding Pearl Harbor (which led to U.S. entrance and full commitment to WWII)
- The covering up of Operation Northwoods (which could have turned the Cold War HOT)
- The covering up of the USS Liberty (war crimes, attack from a so-called "ally")
- The covering up of things such as Operation Paperclip, Operation Mockingbird and COINTELPRO and masking of other such operations to hoodwink the American People.
- The list could go on...

What is WACKO is being ignorant to historical facts AND being belligerent in granting further centralized powers at the same time. That is freaking NUTS!! That is what I see MOST 9/11 "official story" true believers do. They are whacked out!

_________________________________

Freedom - Peace - Prosperity

I agree this can be cork screwing in nature....

and we'd ultimately arrive at a poll exploring supporters of the various theories.

What you point to is that people who don't agree with immaterial facts may vote B, which would be dumb if they truly believe that the substantive portion of the report, as outlined above, is correct and true. I don't think you'll find any of that going on based on the comments added to many of the votes.

Anything that includes planted explosives, with hijacked jets, would point to an out and out lie that could not be reconciled with an A vote.

Don't make it more complicated than it is.

**“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” ~ Mark Twain **

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

I know a guy (idiot) who still thinks 19 arabs did it.

this tally is to see who here is in that boat.

A or B.. Why is that so hard.

Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/

Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/

B FOR BUILDING WTC7

B FOR BUILDING WTC7

B

all the way!

.

who voted A and why that's what I want to know?

Just to piss people off or just because they work at a news corporation?

"Hell is truth seen too late...duty neglected in its season."- Tryon Edwards

"Human beings with love and compassion are some of the most beautiful creatures in the universe... Those without are a plague on us all."

B

for Bullshit. Obviously there were explosives involved, so the 9/11 report is bullshit, hence the whole official 'story' is bullshit.

these folks would probably vote B

190+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
670+ Engineers and Architects
200+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
400+ Professors Question 9/11
230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

however, according to Glenn Beck, they are now right wing terrorists....