Maybe we should form a new party, "Anti-Federalist Party"?
Submitted by manwith4kids on Sun, 06/14/2009 - 21:05
This would be in the spirit of forefathers. We need something new besides Libertarian or Republican. Maybe we form a wing of the republican party. Something has to be done different as we are making ripples in the ocean. Thoughts are welcome.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020448230457421...
»
Yes
Federalism is a sham. Newt Gingrich openly admits that Hamilton is his political idol.
That's where he got his big-government mentality from.
How about the
Party's Over party. LOL
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
anti-federalist.org
http://anti-federalist.org/
_______________________________________________
randpaul2010.com | schiff2010.com | kokeshforcongress.com | rjharris2010.com
I have problems with the name.
Although the meaning is clear to people who read history, I don't think many folks would vote for an "anti-anything" party. Since the objective with a new third party would be to build as broad a base as possible, a more-inclusive-sounding title might be a better choice.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
States Rights Party, a division of the Republic party.
anything better than current party.
IT IS NOT A WASTED VOTE!
I like States' Rights Party.
The way things are headed, decentralization looks like the strategy we must choose anyway.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Dr. Paul is right, it is easier to re-take the Republican party.
They are supposed to be the descendants of the Anti-Federalists.