Legal support to private status of FED
Here is the legal refrerence to 2 cases that affirmed the private status of the fed....
John L. LEWIS, Plaintiff/Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellee. No. 80-5905. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 2, 1982; Decided April 19, 1982; As Amended June 24, 1982
"Plaintiff, who was injured by vehicle owned and operated by a federal reserve bank, brought action alleging jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, David W. Williams, Jr., dismissed holding that federal reserve bank was not a federal agency within meaning of Act and that the court therefore lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. Appeal was taken. The Court of Appeals, Poole, Circuit Judge, held that federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.
Affirmed.
Tell everyone you know,,,,there is no "quasi public" going on here.
The president appoints 2 governors...but the president was appointed by the owners of the fed....so he appoints the men the Fed tell him to appoint....quasi public NO.....quasi modo maybe...I have a hunch this fed is a quasi modo...good hunch...I'll get back on that hunch..ok? ;)
