Washington Times says Fed is an agency in the US gov't
Submitted by xxx-by_request2 on Wed, 06/17/2009 - 13:35Misleading first sentence must be countered, everybody. They (the Washington Times) needs to fix this blatant error or blatant lie, however one chooses to interpret it! Call or email the Editor!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/16/plan-gives-f...
»

















Let's call/write today
Link to Washington Times contacts right below in my post for the "evening crowd".
You guys are never ending with your "the Fed is 4th Branch"
I was trained as an Economist (money and banking -- econometrics) -- Plus I'm a Mises fanatic. I can tell you beyond all possible rational/philosophical/ecunemical certainty that "The Fed" is not part of gov't.
It has abdicated power over the Congress and President -- for sure.
It can indirectly dictate policy -- it has control over the money supply (the abdication of congress from 1913 forward).
The Fed is the head of a Banking Cartel -- in and of itself it has no power; the heads (the trillionairs) and banking families have all the control.
When/If the Fed is audited -- Obama will call on the IMF to replace it. Taking the power "officially" outside of the U.S. This of course is irrelevant because the power is global anyway.
I wouldn't be suprised if they didn't come up with a more powerful agreement.
Dems and Repubs will unanimously (or near it) rule in favor of IMF control.
Octobox
*&^ Constitution --- Constitutional Rationality
A bump for the evening crowd!
Bump!
Here is the list of contacts for the Wash Times!
David Jones, I think, is the best person to call here, but certainly, there is plenty of info in this link where we can bombard lots of people!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/contact-us/
I understand why there's been so much back and forth on this thread about exactly what the Fed is--that's why Griffin's characterization of it as a "creature" is so perfect. Maybe we should ask if the staff at the Wash Times has read it, specifically Ms. Hill. Also, the language she used: "...in the government". The use of the preposition "in"? Bad...really bad. Had she said "of the government", she would have given herself some wiggle room by being able to say, well, it's not really a part of the government, but the board is appointed by the government, but it's sort of acts on behalf of the government, yadayada. But "in the government"? Proves she is completely ignorant on the topic or she knows and got away (for now) with a flat out lie.
It is a corporatist entity plain and simple
With all the worst aspects of being private and public:
It is private in the sense that the People have no control over its actions, it has essentially closed books, it is OWNED by private interests, etc.
It is public in the sense that it has the force of government backing its activity, it is granted cartel regulatory powers, it is granted a legal tender CURRENCY MONOPOLY, etc.
In essence, it is the BEAST. The worst hybrid of private and public in our current land. A pox on the so-called "land of the free".
_________________________________
Freedom - Peace - Prosperity
Yep, like I said before:
A free market will never exist as long as there is monopoly control over the money supply.
--------------------------------
"the only thing that keeps the banking system from failing is general ignorance about how the banking system works."
----------------------------
They said it because it is true.
Of course the Fed is a part of government otherwise you would be able to say it is a creature of the free market - which it is NOT. This monstrosity is not an entity of the private market and any attempts to say it is usually comes from socialists and statists. It is a government cartel with a swath of special privileges that prevent it from competition. It is one of the worst gov't monopolies and should either be privatized or abolished.
"Greater than the force of mighty armies is the power of an idea whose time has come"
- Victor Hugo
What do you mean by "privatized"?
By privatized do you mean stripped of all its government privileges including its legal tender monopoly?
_________________________________
Freedom - Peace - Prosperity
Absolutely
Let other forms of currency compete with the Federal Reserve Notes and let entrepreneurs assume its market share (PayPal, gold, silver, or even beanie babies). If people like using FRNs then that works but at least allow individuals to "opt-out" and choose according to their personal preferences. I think this was a great proposal by F.A. Hayek and I would recommend the Daily Paulers that want to further nationalize the Fed to read F.A. Hayek's free-market alternative "The Denationalization of Money".
"Greater than the force of mighty armies is the power of an idea whose time has come"
- Victor Hugo
Thanks for the humor!
brought a smile to my face after a long day. (and reading the thread 4 down)
------
Libera me, let the truth break, what my fears make..
Libera me......from this dark dream, to the life-stream! --Leslie Phillips
What's next after End the Fed? Repeal the XVI and XVII Amendments!
But that man should play the tyrant over God, and find Him a better man than himself, is astonishing drama indeed!~~D. Sayers
There is no difference between an authoritarian government from the right or the left...F. A.Schaeffer
I'm definitely with that
End the unconstitutional Fed legal tender monopoly and then amend the Constitution to allow free market money.
_________________________________
Freedom - Peace - Prosperity
Kind of
of topic. But did anyone see Bernankes little PR stunt on 60 Minutes the other night? What a nice man he is. Trying to save the country and all. What did they say. He has been preparing for this his entire life. hmmm.
The sheeple sure got a load of c**p about how the fed has been such a saviour to our countries financial well being. and how not printing a bunch of money is what caused the great deppression. It was quite a show. We would have been ruined long ago without the fed dontcha know.
There's a lot of comments pointing that out already!
I LOVE IT!! We're doing it! It's working. The regular folks are seeing it! Hooray. This is a small victory.
Explore Orthodox Christianity
the comment
section made my day!
quoting Ron Paul
"Federal Reserve is as federal as Federal Express".
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."
-- Patrick Henry
Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
“The most important element of a free society, where individual rights are held in the highest esteem, is the rejection of the initiation of violence.” Dr. Ron Paul
The federal reserve isn't
The federal reserve isn't really that private. If it were then it wouldn't have the power over setting interest rates- and wouldn't be politically connected at all. Do any of you really think that washington doesn't work hand in hand with the Fed? If it were to be made more "public" than private would it be any better? No.
The argument that the Fed is "private" and that's why its bad isn't a very good argument. The problem is that it exists plain and simple. Any central bank that exists is unnecessary and harmful.
It pretty much is a government agency.
And now that the Fed is going to be given broad regulatory powers, it will be pretty hard to argue that it's not a government agency.
"Bankers are putting poison in our food and water." - Psychotic dirtbag conspiracy theorist fake-libertarian, exploiter of Dr. Paul, Alex Jones
Hey Washington Times! Tell it to the JUDGE..........
If the courts find that the Fed is private...what the F else is there?
John L. LEWIS, Plaintiff/Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellee. No. 80-5905. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 2, 1982; Decided April 19, 1982; As Amended June 24, 1982
"Plaintiff, who was injured by vehicle owned and operated by a federal reserve bank, brought action alleging jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, David W. Williams, Jr., dismissed holding that federal reserve bank was not a federal agency within meaning of Act and that the court therefore lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. Appeal was taken. The Court of Appeals, Poole, Circuit Judge, held that federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.
Affirmed.
. . .Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks . . . are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.(lawyers and judges)
Shut off the TV....thank you.
Unify
Any Phone Numbers
let's call
Already lots of comments in
Already lots of comments in their comments section regarding this. This is GREAT!
Bad journalistic error
Bad form.
_________________________________
Freedom - Peace - Prosperity
Or more media/Fed
Or more media/Fed propaganda?
Either way
It is the editor's responsibility to have journalistic integrity and either by failure or corruption he/she has not demonstrated that in the first line of this article. Hence, very poor form.
_________________________________
Freedom - Peace - Prosperity