NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - Sensitive Information

0 votes

You MUST watch this brand new video immediately, whether you are a "9/11 truther", a blowback / incompetence theorist, or on the fence. (If anyone remembers the video of the infamous cab driver cab driver that was posted here a few weeks ago, this is the full video from which that clip was taken, and it provides a full context for his statements.) The website has tons of additional evidence and an FAQ section. Fasten your seatbelts

-humanic

P.S. If you find this information as important as I do please comment below so that the thread remains active and more people can see it

http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com

To whom it concerns, i.e., everyone:

In 2006 Citizen Investigation Team launched an independent investigation into the act of terrorism which took place at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. This exhaustive three-year inquest involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day.

Be forewarned: Our findings are extraordinarily shocking and frightening. They are also deadly serious, and deserving of your immediate attention. This is not about a conspiracy theory or any theory at all. This is about independent, verifiable evidence which unfortunately happens to conclusively establish as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a false flag "black operation" involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.

If you are skeptical of (or even incensed by) this statement we do not blame you. We are not asking you to take our word for it, nor do we want you to do that. We want you to view the evidence and see with your own eyes that this is the case. We want you to hear it directly from the eyewitnesses who were there, just as we did.

Please understand that this information is not being brought to your attention simply for educational purposes. It is presented within the context of a “call to action” accompanied by a detailed step-by-step strategy intended to inspire and empower you to do something about it. But first, please familiarize yourself with the evidence by viewing and paying close attention to the 81-minute video presentation, National Security Alert.

Thank you for your concern and thank you for your action.

Sincerely,

Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis

Citizen Investigation Team

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

say you believe this

What did they do with all those people on the "plane" that didn't crash into the Pentagon? I'm just wondering.......

"Many of us agree that you and I have no right to use coercion against people who don't owe us anything. The same prohibition applies to groups of people who constitute the government. The reason is simple: unjust acts do not become just when legalized. "

"Many of us agree that you and I have no right to use coercion against people who don't owe us anything. The same prohibition applies to groups of people who constitute the government. The reason is simple: unjust acts do not become just when legalized. "

This is addressed in the FAQ on the site:

Frequently Asked Questions >> If Flight 77 did not hit the building what happened to its passengers and crew?

http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/faq-passengers_and_crew....

What "all those people" are you referring to?

How many are you personally aware of? How many of the passenger families have you seen incensed over the government cover-up or non-addressing of so many anomalies...unlike the ground zero families who are ubiquitous? How many of them are at the forefront of calling for a new investigation like the ground zero families continue to do? Where do they congregate to commiserate? How many interviews have you seen with these families? How much money was dispersed to passenger's families from the 911 compensation fund we all donated to? Did it help ease their pain or keep them from financial trouble? Are they thankful for it? Do any of them feel compelled to speak? Are there many quotes emanating from interviews with these families (other than those named Olsen or Beamer)?

How do cell phones work aboard an airliner at altitude and speed...especially in 2001? Have YOU ever connected a call from say 25,000ft. at 500 knots?

**“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” ~ Mark Twain **

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

Excellent questions.

One thing that I can't seem to get my head around is:

If the explosves were on the inside, then why wouldn't we see much more building debris on the lawn?
It was pretty evident with OKC, that the windows were blown outward, and not inward.
They certainly seemed to get as much stuff covering the Pentalawn ( foam, sand) as quickly as they could afterward..

★★★★★★
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."

dunno...shaped charges?

plus...what was in the dumpsters that we see billowing with black smoke...airplane parts like a couple of pieces of cowling?

**“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” ~ Mark Twain **

"...there is no doubt that it (socialism) could not possibly have affected us so widely and so deeply as it has, had it not been heavily financed". - B. Carroll Reece

bump

bump

Humanic

I have another question.

What punctured through all the rings of the Pentagon? Do you think explosives were planted to make it look like something penetrated all of those rings?

★★★★★★
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."

Well, as I said below,

given that absolutely no one saw a missile, global hawk, or any other flying object on the south side, and since no one saw the light poles fall over/get knocked down, and since there is abundant evidence of staging of the light poles (some of which is addressed here), the only logical conclusion is that it was done by pre-planted explosives, just like at the WTC.

To go into a little "educated guessing" about how this could have been accomplished:

As Richard Gage of Architects of Engineers for 9/11 Truth frequently points out there was a huge Elevator Modernization project that had taken place at the WTC just prior to 9/11, which was reported on in Elevator Magazine in March of 2001 (PDF of aritcle here), which would have given them the necessary access and pretext to rig the building for demolitions. Also, the elevator renovation team with ACE Elevator's fled the building after the second plane hit, which was described as a highly unusual thing for them to do since the industry usually takes pride in helping with rescues. (See here for much more info on this.)

We see the same M.O. at the Pentagon. Government Executive reported that:

"On Sept. 11, Pentagon construction crews were doing final, touch-up work on the first wedge after more than three years of renovation"

Michael Flocco, whose son died in the Pentagon on 9/11, and who helped with the rebuilding process called Operation Phoenix, said on Larry King:

"... some of the columns and the windows had previously been reinforced for the first phase of the renovation. It was a five-phase renovation program. The first phase had just been completed only a week before."

So again, we see the perfect pretext under which that area could have been rigged.

Also, once again we see the odd evacuating of contractors at the last minute before the strike, just like the "elevator modernization" crew left the WTC just before the collapse. See here on History Commons: Contractors Evactuate Pentagon just before It is Hit. As they point out, there is no evidence that anyone else was evacuated before the strike.

Thanks again for the detailed response, and your patience.

So I'm guessing that the holes that went through the concentric rings of the pentagon, lined up with the "official" flight path that was sold to the public.

This is very intriguing. Thanks for all your research.

★★★★★★
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."

Yes, exactly

The damage to the building, starting with the facade, going through the destroyed columns, and ending with the infamous C ring hole, is compatible only with a very specific south side approach with a margin of error of only about one degree. It is not at all compatible with the north side flight path described by all of the witnesses seen in National Security Alert.

See here for a detailed analysis with graphics from the ASCE building performance report.
http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/faq-can_north_side_plane_hit.html

See here also:
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=615

There are no witnesses on record in independent interviews who specifically place the plane on the south side flight path. As you saw in National Security Alert, ALL of the witnesses who were in the best locations to see where the plane was in relation to the gas station place it on the north side, meaning that it could not have hit the light poles, and that it could not have hit the building, because the damage pattern would have been totally different.

This is why Officer Roosevelt Roberts and others saw it still in flight AFTER the explosion, and why the elaborate "second plane cover story" that I described below was put forth to convince anyone who saw the plane flying away that it must have been this non-existent "second plane" that they saw and not THE plane.

June 20th

bump...

Bump!

"(Better) to be confused in the search for truth than fully confident and sound asleep in a dream of lies." ~ Michael Nystrom

"it is good for the establishment to adopt liberty ideology, but it is not good for those who have already adopted liberty to fall to the feet of the establishment." ~ Annica2

I saw a video, about a year ago

about this. This is the expanded and professional edited version. I now have no doubt that the plane did not hit the Pentagon. And I remember watching this before and I knew in my gut that the cab driver was telling the truth. So, it is quite apparent to me that the Commercial jet and a "global hawk" converged on the Pentagon at almost the same instance in time. The jet flies away, and the global hawk does the damage. This would explain the light poles, the smell of cordite(not mentioned in this video), the jet lifting up, the jet flying away. It would also explain the slower than NTSB speed of the jet from an observer in the Navy annex.

SirFelix

Don't let your "gut feeling" get in the way of an objective analysis of the facts. NO ONE saw a Global Hawk or anything else on the south side. Global Hawks are huge. Their wingspans are only about ten feet less than that of a 757. It's absolutely impossible for a global hawk to fly on the south side unseen by anyone. (And if this alleged unseen craft was something else significantly smaller it would have been too small to hit all of the light poles.)

EVERYONE saw one and only one craft. They saw a large commercial airliner and nothing else. As you know they all saw it on the north side of the Citgo station and therefore it did not hit the light poles nor the building.

You're also overlooking the fact that Lloyde is seen deliberately lying in this video. He admits in the preinterview that his neighbor was "up on the bridge" when he took the closeup pictures of Lloyde's cab. Then when the cameras start rolling he tries to claim he was nowhere near the bridge. Even after he is shown pictures clearly showing him on the bridge (including his neighbors pictures!) he still acts like he doesn't believe it, even though a short while earlier he already ADMITTED that he knew he was up on the bridge. Why do you think he's purposely lying about his location and trying to move himself north? It's because there was NOTHING on the south side.

You're also ignoring the impossibility of his story, physical and otherwise. Think about what you are saying. You are saying that a Global Hawk, which went unseen by every single witness, flies on the south side, hits light pole number one, which is roughly 40 feet tall and i believe 247 lbs... that light pole turns on its side, flies through Lloyde's windsheild, does NOT scratch his hood AT ALL, does not make any significant hole in his back seat, yet somehow remains suspended above his cab. Then almost immediately, within minutes of the attack, a silent stranger (who Lloyde first calls "his friend" and then changes it to a stranger) comes by and helps him pull this giant, heavy pole out of his car, STILL without damaging the hood AT ALL. And then Lloyde (an old man), falls down with the pole, yet still holds it up, still doesn't scratch the hood, the stranger DOESN'T HELP HIM, but gets back his car and drives away. And NO ONE sees any of this! AND there' s a giant scratch in the road coming from the median leading up to the pole for no apparent reason. And it's just a coincidence that he admits that the event was "planned" by people with "all the money" "for their own reasons" and that they used him, and that they "came across the highway together". Come on man, please think about how ridiculous this is. It's not compatible with the evidence or physics or common sense.

You're also ignoring the damage to the generator trailer. Do you really think a Global Hawk could hit all five light poles, and hit and turn the generator trailer, AND cause all of the damage to the building, all without even touching the lawn in addition to not being seen by a single witness? (See my first link for more info on the generator trailer damage).

I know that Lloyde being such a soft-spoken, friendly guy makes it hard to believe that he could be complicit in such a horrendous event (which is undoubtedly why he was chosen for this role), but the evidence cannot be denied.

(There' two long interviews with Lloyde here if you haven't seen them yet)

If you examine the wingspan of a global hawk, you will see that

it is quite capable of knocking down the light poles in the NTSB flight path.

Also, the air speed is comparable, to what the witness in the Naval Annex reported.

The passenger jet pulls up and flies away, the global hawk does the damage.

This is as plausible as any theory presented thus far.

Aircraft flying low to the ground, will only be seen by people close to their flight path.

The witnesses are not lying, or mistaken for that matter, they are telling the truth as they see it.

So if they are telling the truth, the answer lies, with whatever scenario, fits the truth.

We have witnesses who say the plane fly away.

We have witnesses of a northern approach.

We have light pole damage of a southern approach.

You do the math.

None of the witnesses, have profitted from telling the world what they witnessed.

Common sense.

Please re-read my post

You wrote:

"If you examine the wingspan of a global hawk, you will see that it is quite capable of knocking down the light poles in the NTSB flight path."

I did not say otherwise. I explicitly said: "Global Hawks are huge. Their wingspans are only about ten feet less than that of a 757." I agree with you that the wingspan is large enough to hypothetically knock down the poles, because it's a demonstrable fact.

You wrote:

The witnesses are not lying, or mistaken for that matter, they are telling the truth as they see it.

Most of them are not lying, but Lloyde is. As I explained he ADMITTED that he knew he was "up on the bridge" before the camera started rolling, and that is where the photographs clearly show him to be. After that he tried to claim he was nowhere near the bridge, even when shown the clear photographic evidence. If you watch "Eye of the Storm" you will see that the guy is very lucid throughout most of the day and not an idiot . He was not confused. He was lying.

"The passenger jet pulls up and flies away, the global hawk does the damage. This is as plausible as any theory presented thus far.

No, it absolutely is not. As I said, "NO ONE saw a Global Hawk or anything else on the south side." As I also said, given their size "it's absolutely impossible for a global hawk to fly on the south side unseen by anyone." Also, NO ONE saw the light poles get knocked down. (Some people mentioned the light poles being knocked down in their early accounts but did not say that SAW it happen, and when CIT questioned them on this, they admitted that they did NOT see it happen, but rather saw them down later and ASSUMED that they got knocked down). NO ONE saw the pole in Lloyde's car either, nor is there a single photograph of such a thing, even though it would be quite a sight. You're also ignoring the evidence of staging, including the big scratch in the road indicating that the pole was dragged. You're trying to invent a scenario that will make it such that Lloyde doesn't have to be lying, but this scenario is not supported by the evidence, and in fact is contradicted by it.

Please read/watch
1. http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/faq-were_light_poles_dow...
2. http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/faq-staged_light_poles.html
3. http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/videos-firstknownaccompl...
4. http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/videos-eyeofthestorm.html

My problem with a Global Hawk

is that the wings are sooo long and thin, that they certainly should have sheered off after hitting light poles, causing it to crash and burn into the lawn.

Also , how could a light weight aircraft like the GH, go through 4 or 5 rings of the pentagon?

★★★★★★
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."

Truth isnt easily found

and at the beginning a patriots cause is ridiculed and laughed at. In time when his cause is proven then he becomes a hero to all for his perseverance and his fight for truth and justice.
Remember when Ron Paul was thought of as a loon a crazy just like his supporters, laughed at, ridiculed we knew then it was them and not our cause that was unjust. The same thing happened with 911 we were called loons crazy conspriacy nuts, as the facts start coming in it becomes clear that too many fallacies are eveident in this crime scene and we have to listen carefully for deception takes a clear mind and diminishes its clarity.
Be clear on this, we were lied to and yet to get the answers we all have a right to know we must stay strong and not wavier for the truth shall be set free. Its never too late to realize you have been deceived. It is an awakening we have all been through its just another stage of the agenda we all know is coming.
The truth shall set you free.

pretty good film

My biggest beef with this is their explanation for the light poles. The Secret Service did it the night before? They're saying light poles where taken down, to look like they were hit by a plane, out on the street without anyone seeing, and without anyone seeing them before the attack? That's a hell of a stretch. Otherwise I like the info.

Bump!

Wake up RPers! We aren't the kooks of the r3VOLution. This is very real.

I just watched it....

and I hope this video takes off. Well done. People are not as emotional/irrational about the pentagon as they are the towers. This video might be more likely to open people's eyes.

Very good point

I agree.

I also like it because they can't muddy the waters as easily by bringing out their "experts" to battle our "experts" like they try to do with the WTC, you know? (Although their experts have admitted freefall now, and not been able to counter the peer-reviewed info, so I think they pretty much failed at this point.)

In my experience most people can plainly see that it is impossible for these witnesses to be simultaneously incorrect in the same way about the flight path from their various yet excellent vantage points.

interesting

very interesting...

"Unite Or Die"..

I respect the need to investigate the event

I do,however, respect the need to focus our energy on the perpetrators.

After watching Money Masters it becomes clear that 9/11 events were just another "event."

In fact, relatively speaking, a small one.

A group of men who control the central banks of this world are who we need to focus on.

The 9/11 movement is too carefully controlled to yield what is needed.

I suggest that if the young men who produced this video have learned anything through their research, they would agree with what I am saying.

They could have studied the fire bombing of Dresden and gotten to the same point....very powerful people "present" world events to us through the media.

We must look behind all the events as a whole and determine their goals and identities.

They own the central banks. Effort and resources spent on small details IS WHAT THEY WANT.

It is how we are distracted and controlled.

In 8 years the 9/11 movement has achieved one thing and one thing only.

They have fully discredited and isolated themselves.

This is and has been the goal of the men in power.....mission accomplished.

As these video producers agree with this conclusion

"The men in power orchestrated this event".............then they must agree with this:

"the men in power fully pre planned the truth movement in advance and have used it to their advantage since 9/11.

Get away from the truth movement and expose the families that own the banks...it is a far bigger lie and is far more important that we expose it.

Unify

B.S.

The Money Masters is great and all, BUT THAT CAB DRIVER LOOKS GUILTY AS SIN!!!!
He AND his wife need their butts dragged into somewhere, offered immunity, and we start from there.

★★★★★★
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."

Jefferson, you could strech

Jefferson, you could strech the cab driver and his wife by the neck for as long as they could dance and still not be getting to the true source of the problem! They more than likely were told by someone who heard that this is what was told by someone they don't know that they might, maybe do if they should be given the go ahead by someone else.

Yes it's confusing to be a pawn, but they are expendable and know nothing.

FOCUS on the bankers...they have the history of controlling things to the detriment of free people. Their most notable setback (in history) being that Christ's ONLY act of violence was to throw the money changers (bankers, of thier time) out of the temple. Fable or not, just how bad of an evil did the hero see these money changers to be?

I hear you...

It is just frustrating to not be able to get a starting point, and start tearing flesh off of the bone.
I have done my part in support of HR 1207 and S604. I can't help but feel it will be defeated somehow though, but I am holding out hope.

Hope without action is pointless.

★★★★★★
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."

I'm glad this never ends , The pentacon was released years ago

This film is like the son of Pentacon . Muahhh ha ha ......( cough ) Mua ha

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Live like you mean it ..... Your life is your own !
http://www.randpaul2010.com

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !

bump

I will be making 9-11 a campaign issue. Tonight ,the manager for our GOP Congressional "favorite son" candidate is coming to our County Committee meeting. I will be offering to send this video to them both. I have 4 questions for ALL candidates this year. "Do you support a new investigation?" is the biggee.

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.