Price Fixing in Ancient Rome
As might be expected, the Roman Republic was not to be spared a good many ventures into control of the economy by the government. One of the most famous of the Republican statutes was the Law of the Twelve Tables (449 B.C.) which, among other things, fixed the maximum rate of interest at one uncia per libra (approximately 8 percent), but it is not known whether this was for a month or for a year. At various times after this basic law was passed, however, politicians found it popular to generously forgive debtors their agreed-upon interest payments. A Licinian law of 367 B.C., for instance, declared that interest already paid could be deducted from the principal owed, in effect setting a maximum price of zero on interest. The lex Genucia (342 B.C.) had a similar provision and we are told that violations of this "maximum" were "severely repressed under the lex Marcia." Levy concludes that "Aside from the Law of the Twelve Tables, these ad hoc or demagogic measures soon went out of use."[1]
The laws on grain were to have a more enduring effect on the history of Rome. From at least the time of the fourth century B.C., the Roman government bought supplies of corn or wheat in times of shortage and resold them to the people at a low fixed price. Under the tribune Caius Gracchus the Lex Sempronia Frumentaria was adopted, which allowed every Roman citizen the right to buy a certain amount of wheat at an official price much lower than the market price. In 58 B.C. this law was "improved" to allow every citizen free wheat. The result, of course, came as a surprise to the government. Most of the farmers remaining in the countryside simply left to live in Rome without working.
Continue at: http://mises.org/story/3498





















Bump
Guess we'll all have to move to DC.. :(
Good read, thnx
Who needs to pay attention to historical facts?!?
Jeesh, what are you trying to say here? That history has proven that the government meddling in what ought to be the private and free market always leads to problems? Maybe back then, but now we have the interwebs, and of course, the end all be all argument to end all arguments, 9/11!
/end sarcasm
Seriously though, it's a great article and Mises is a fantastic web site. If only people would learn to actually learn from history, we'd all be better off.
I guess I should have put "911" in the title :(
"Government spending cannot create additional jobs. If the government provides the funds required by taxing the citizens or by borrowing from the public, it abolishes on the one hand as many jobs as it creates on the other.", www.mises.org
"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com
No need to put 9/11 in the title.
I think the article was a great read. I'm sure many here have read it, problem is that it's not as disputable as 9/11 so we read it, agree and move on.
Good read though. Thank you for sharing. It is info that we need, and I promise you we are digesting.
So cheer up. The fact that no one is flaming each other in this article is a means that we agree.
Aku Soku Zan
Aku Soku Zan