Why the battle for Truth and Libery never stood a chance

As troubles in the world are on the rise and people seek information about the world around them, according to an article written over at bloomberg, a staggering 24 million viewers tune into one of the three largest news networks on average.

When we watch a tv show or go to a movie theater and are engaged in the material that is being presented to us via optic and verbal stimuli, we are essentially induced into a hypnotic state. If this were not the case, you wouldnt find yourself crying at the end of benjie, for example, because your conscious mind would be able to recognize the fictitious nature of the scenario that you are observing, and the emotional connection that programming content would otherwise have would be severed. Now its important to understand that hypnosis is a natural, normal state that most people experience every day (think about times when you missed an exit driving on the freeway or day dreaming on the road). Intelligence doesnt shield us from this, in fact its our very intelligence which allows us to be hypnotized. When we are in this state, we become far more suggestible as information is essentially bypassing our critical mind.

now, having said that, take a listen to this 4 minute youtube clip of a news interview.

WATCH VIDEO CLIP HERE ON YOUTUBE

The topic of discussion seems fairly innocuous. Its simply an interview of an author promoting his book, which you can derive some of the subject matter being something about fluffy feel good rhetoric about working together and solving problems in the world and this strange correlation between google and hezbollah.

Now that youve watched it, its time to learn a bit more information on different forms of hypnosis and suggestion.

While conventional hypnosis requires the subject to be in a willing and relaxed state to allow themselves to essentially fall into hypnosis, covert methods have been developed particularly over the last century which allow a skilled hypnotist to barrage your conscious mind with words and information, and in its state of comprehension, insert verbal commands which your subconscious mind may inadvertently interpret differently than your analytical conscious mind. This is a well studied topic (and increasingly becoming more mainstream) called neural linguistic programming (NLP). Segments of suggestion are essentially blended into topics of conversation, and when spoken confidently and smoothly, have the ability to bypass critical thinking, particularly when under a light state of hypnosis to begin with.

Knowing that, watch the segment again. I like this video because its just loaded with potentially covert dialogue.

right off the bat, youll hear phrases like "things we could have never dreamed of" "react quickly to change" "new world (dis)order" before he even goes into introducing the author.

now how the author starts his dialogue is very important. He begins by asserting a string of verifiable fact. "as we pick up the paper... or *watch the headlines here today ", these are all things that people may have done today and we can affirm that they may have happened. (NOTE: this was a command. your conscious mind may not directly read it, but you would be dead wrong to think your subconscious mind hasnt read it in your peripheral vision. look what the title says "OUR NEW REALITY")

More verifiable statements to follow - things that are happening today such as the collapse of the US economy and job loss data. this was a string of verifiable information that has some basic fact of evidence or empirical data to support those statements. Then he ends this string with "...suddenly the world looks very different from what we might have ever expected" - This is NOT a verifiable fact, its an emotional-based analysis which negates defining why this is true (this type of phrase i believe is known as 'deletion'). One is inclined to agree with such a statement having no real connection to the circumstance of the statements being made.

Comments go back to the interviewer. you can hear him saying "everything weve been taught to believe or expect, we cant expect anymore" (the context of this question/statement is being analyzed by the conscious mind. its subconscious association can interpret this as a command rather than an inference).

Author continues - "profound change" , "larger change", (goes on about attacking terrorism it gets stronger) then states that things arent working and then states the lesson of his book. at the end of the sentence, he says "requires a different way of thinking". NOTE: hand gesture near the head. It isnt uncommon to not only use pitch and tone control in your voice to enunciate key phrases but also visual cues to alert the subconscious to pay attention to this next comment.

Then there is this anecdotal connection of google and hezbollah - "never understand using traditional framework" theres then some questionably suggestive phraseology in his explanation but accentuates "adapt" and "respond", again with visible gesture.

further in the dialogue the author is making a point about "highly detailed highly specific plan". this may be genuinely coincidental here, but the gesture of the hand pointing literally at the headline on screen can have the effect of correlating those phrases to the headline "OUR NEW REALITY". then "move towards a solution"

Interviewer goes on and makes a comment containing the phrase "agree... big picture" (rolling hand gestures accentuating these words)

author then goes in to explain the "incredible sense of unease" of political readers. and says the only solution for that blah blah "practically working"

interviewer - "make or break moment"

reponse leading with covert phrase "emerge incredibly strong" and "new rules" of the game and that we need a "radical transformation"

While the context of these phrases were all shaped around a topic that your conscious mind has interpreted to mean one thing, these command phrases are picked up by the subconscious which has a far stronger influence on your behavior than your conscious mind. and sadly to say, your subconscious mind doesnt have that ability to rationally filter context. Your subconscious mind just digested what could be construed as 4 minutes of propaganda for the new world order!

Looking at it this way, no wonder we are losing our nations youth to the ideas of socialist/fascist policies being acceptable. The fight isnt even fair. We're allowing ourselves to be extremely vulnerable and open to some pretty insane suggestion with the tremendous number of hours we spend in front of the tv as a society. We're losing our ability to critically think because we are being suggested, subliminally, how to act believe and on a daily basis.

The game is rigged against us, and most of us are unaware that we're standing on the playing field.