Phone call from flight 93 coached? Listen to this!

To me, that "tell my children I love them" line was the most telling of all. Put yourself in her shoes (assume the story is real) and ask, would I just use the generic term "my children" instead of "Billy" and "Sally"? It certainly very very fishy.

The untimely July American Airlines / Qualcomm announcement acted as a cold shower. Barely acknowledged in press reports, it confirms that the Bush administration had embroidered the cell phone narrative (similar to what they did with WMDs) and that the 9/11 Commission's account was either flawed or grossly exaggerated.

*******************************************

Concluding Remarks

A large part of the description, regarding the 19 hijackers relies on cell phone conversations with family and friends.

While a few of these calls (placed at low altitude) could have got through, the wireless technology was not available. On this issue, expert opinion within the wireless telecom industry is unequivocal.

In other words, at least part of the Commission's script in Chapter 1 on the cell phone conversations, is fabricated.

According to the American Airline / Qualcomm announcement, the technology for cell phone transmission at high altitude will only be available aboard commercial aircraft in 2006. This is an inescapable fact.

In the eyes of public opinion, the cell phone conversations on the Arab hijackers is needed to sustain the illusion that America is under attack.

The "war on terrorism" underlying the National Security doctrine relies on real time "evidence" concerning the Arab hijackers. The latter personify, so to speak, this illusive "outside enemy" (Al Qaeda), which is threatening the homeland.

Embodied into the Commission's "script" of 911, the narrative of what happened on the plane with the Arab hijackers is therefore crucial. It is an integral part of the Administration's disinformation and propaganda program. It constitutes a justification for the anti-terror legislation under the Patriot acts and the waging of America's pre-emptive wars against Afghanistan and Iraq.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO408B.html

While I am open-minded on the topic of just who was responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001 hijackings, I found this video utterly unconvincing, and did not find it to provide proof of anything except the predetermined suppositions of its producer. Really, does anything think it actually did? I cannot begin to imagine how I would sound while making a similar phonecall, and can imagine a vast range of possibilities.

How anyone would find this video or the taped phonecall "evidence" of any conspiracy is beyond me.

Just wondering.

Are you now going to tell me to "bite you" like you did to the poor soul that dared question your JFK post?

I asked, as little 8 months ago and using a Nokia, if my airline pilot friend....leaving from Regan...would call me over Virginia on his way to Phoenix.

He tried many times. He couldn't.

**“The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.” ~ Mark Twain **

I believed the official story up until about a year and a half ago... I was a huge Limbaugh and Hannity retard back then.... But once I saw Building 7 coming down so fast... I said... NO WAY! Now stuff like this comes out and it just makes me wonder even more.

9-11 is the biggest fraud EVER perpetrated upon the WORLD! WEll, besides the FED, of course. TOTAL LIE! Bin Laden hasn't even BIN indicted! "not enough evidence" -FBI

I would like RP more if he just asked for more investigations... maybe he has... I dunno... But you seriously, got some issues if you can't smell the lies steaming off the 9-11 cr@p pile.

Does my burka make my butt look fatwa?