The Great Bank Robbery: How the FED is destroying America
Submitted by legalizeliberty on Tue, 06/30/2009 - 20:15http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-06-30/The_Great_Ban...
As global leaders struggle to rescue their nations from economic breakdown, the legitimacy of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency is under attack. Perhaps the problem lies with the Fed.
A large part of the “super” in the American superpower is based on the modern creed of liberal democracy, which serves as the motor of free-market capitalism. And the lubricant that keeps this colossal machine humming at full speed 24/7 is the US dollar. So before we risk any conjectures on the future prospects of America’s versatile banknote, which presently serves as the ‘world’s reserve currency,’ perhaps we should know more about who controls it.
In the Fed We Trust
It usually comes as a shock to people – especially diehard Americans who place infinite trust in their sacred Constitution – when they discover that the US dollar is not a product of the American government. That’s right, fellow consumers, that crumpled wad of dollars in your pocket is the product of the U.S. Federal Reserve, and despite the very official title, is about as “federal” as Federal Express. The reality is that the U.S. Federal Reserve is a profit-making venture just like Wal-Mart, General Motors or McDonald’s.
Yet the US Constitution clearly states (Article 1, Section 8) that one of the many functions of government is to “coin money, regulate the value thereof.” Indeed, this task was deemed so important that the Founding Fathers mentioned it ahead of the obligation to “raise and support armies.” The Constitution says absolutely nothing about outside parties being responsible for printing money or regulating interest rates.
To quote Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, “The privilege of creating and issuing money is… the supreme prerogative of government.”
Today, a handful of blue-blooded American politicians (a very rare breed these days, it seems) are beginning to echo ol’ Abe on the very same issue.
Ron Paul, the congressman from Texas who made an unsuccessful bid for the 2008 Republican Party presidential nomination, represents a growing number of Americans who want to see the Fed severely tamed, or put out of business altogether.
“Congress created the Fed although it had no constitutional authority to do so,” Paul told his peers during a recent House investigative meeting. “We forget that those powers not explicitly granted to Congress by the Constitution are inherently denied to the Congress and thus the authority to establish a central bank was never given.
“Congress… has essentially given up its oversight responsibilities over the Fed: there are no true audits; Congress knows nothing of the conversations, the plans, and the action-taking in concert with other central banks. We get less and less information regarding the money supply each year,” Paul continued.
continue reading at the link
http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-06-30/The_Great_Ban...





Congress did not create the fed
They conveniently stepped out of the way of the men who OWNED them and allowed the charter to be passed. The charter was created by the Morgan Warburg money trust and that is the truth.
Watch Money masters.
Unify
Congress was corrupt, but I don't think it's wise to imply....
That they created the Federal Reserve system...
http://www.mises.org
They clearly didn't willingly create the system, they authorized the system to go into effect because the private bankers demanded from all it's customers the creation of a Federal Reserve monopoly.
Congress was somewhat co-erced as usual into authorizing the establishment of a Federal Reserve, because the legislation was passed in the middle of the night.
Congress at the same time acted as an enabling mechanism for the Fed to truly take over, meaning if the Congress and it's campaign owners were not so corrupt in revolving door lobbying, they couldn't have enabled the Fed to take over.
But in the longrun the Private International Bankers is who truly created and designed, the Federal Reserve government. We were not even polled on this decision.
As a junior scholar of this time in history I have one thing to
say.
I fully and wholeheartedly disagree with you.
The fed bill was passed with the full knowledge of Wilson and the congress.
Wilson was one of them and evidenced ZERO leadership and ZERO courage in the face of the men who owned him.
The cowards in congress were fully COMPLICIT in the passing of the act. Warburg managed the situation flawlessly.
The necessary number of votes were "home for the holidays" when the bill got passed....
To this I say bullsh%$!
This jack had been front page for 20 years.
The congress KNEW this was going down and they were all bought and paid for.
It was PLANNED to pass near the holiday to give them all the necessary excuse.
The New York Times TRUMPETED Wilson signing the bill.
It was a rig job from the damn start NO IMPLICATIONS NECESSARY.
These people are cowards and murderers and the congress was complicit and is to this day.
Link to charges brought against fed below.
http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html
In 1933 McFadden filed charges with the judiciary committee. This was a criminal enterprise long before the act was passed.
Has congress acted on the charges brought by the head of the banking and currency committee?
NO!
They are all complicit in conspiracy to commit fraud. Coerced? No. Bought and paid for? Yes....there is a difference.
The fed bill had been publicly discussed for over 20 years. Rig job.
Unify
Thanks tstorey
Great site! I enjoyed it. :o)
Yes they are complicit cowards...But NOT the creators..n/t
*
Thanks*)
Thanks for your informative comment.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government -- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests."
-- Patrick Henry
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
My website: http://www.libertypoet.com/
STAND WITH RAND 2016