Libertarian party website Nolan chart slams Ron Paul - "Ron Paul shows his true colors"

Hi The Patriot,

I think the name of the website caused you to assume that it is operated or owned by David Nolan. He does not own or operate it. The "Nolan Chart" website was started in 2007 by Walt Thiessen from Virginia. Thiessen just used the name "Nolan Chart" to get attention because it is a very well known political chart developed by David Nolan. Although David Nolan had a website when he ran for Congress in 2006 in Arizona as a Libertarian, it is no longer up on the web. David Nolan did found the Libertarian Party in 1971 but he did not found the website "Nolan Chart."
The Libertarian Party's website is www.lp.org and has a video on its front page of Ron Paul being interviewed by Judge Napolitano on Freedom Watch.
I don't agree with Mr. West's disapproval of Ron Paul. I think he is really off on a tangent and wrong. I started the Ron Paul Meetup Group in Seoul, Korea and donated the maximum to Ron Paul's campaign. I am also a proud Life Member of the Libertarian Party. Please don't confuse the LP www.lp.org with other people's websites. For example, the "Daily Paul", is not owned by Ron Paul and there are many articles posted on the "Daily Paul", that Dr. Paul would not agree with. To say that Mr. West's article on the "Nolan Chart" is on the Libertarian Party website is as incorrect as saying some article on the "Daily Paul" is on Ron Paul's website.

Lets work for liberty and not fight each other.

Anyone can post on NolanChart, it takes a few minutes to sign up, and you can begin posting immediately. In fact most of the Ron Paul posts you'll find on there are VERY positive. I posted on there frequently during the primaries and almost universally got positive responses... relax...

If such an advance were made upon a woman, a reasonable defense would be a sharp slap across the perp's face. Dr. Paul not slugging the guy was an exercise in restraint, a reflection of his decency, since a punch to the nose, in my view, would have been an appropriate act of self defense.

when he dropped his pants and Sexually Harassed Ron Paul. Then as Ron tries to escape Sacha Exploits and Intensifies that response by Blocking Ron's escape. This raises it to the level of Sexual Assault. When our fight or flight response is activated, the fight or flight system bypasses our rational mind. A person cannot be held accountable for his actions and/or words while under the effects of this fight or flight response. Sacha was responsible for what Ron said then, but Ron might have resisted later saying “my supporters are gonna figure out, why in the world I didn’t sock this guy in the nose”. He should not be ashamed to his supporters for his Flight response. In stating this He may have been in error. Though he may very well have been justified, in physically persuasive force in his attempt to escape, he chose Flight in an induced irrational moment. Ron's peaceful actions in this moment, gives confidence to the people that he will act appropriately in a peaceful manner regarding foreign policy in difficult times, and reserve the "punch in the nose" as a last resort. The question arises whether Ron should at the least make a report and see what law enforcement recommends and let them state for the record what should be done. We have evidence on video of it even where Sacha blocks Ron's escape. Many rape victims choose not to report these types of crimes because they feel that they deserved it or that it didn't really hurt them all that much. But the perpetrators go on to victimize other people, and they suffer severe emotional pain and suffering.

How about equal protection from being thrown to the wolves?
Defimation of character
yes ???

WTF?? If he had been offered crack and called the guy a "junkie", would the Libertarian party call him biased against drug users and show his "true colors" on the war on drugs?? Awful logic.

I don't care how libertarian correct, Nolan Chart correct, Raychel Maddow correct it is, if some little creep pulls down his pants in an attempted creepy sexual advance, one that would be disgusting to most all but the most perverted out there, I believe calling the person a queer to be a mild response.

Sorry, but for those who disagree, put yourselves in the victim's shoes the next time someone you just met pulls his pants down in front of you in an effort to invite sex. (That includes both sexes.) I wonder how libertarian correct you will be.

"Even individuals who chose to love someone of the same sex."

This article is warped. Since when does this Bruno nonsense suddenly become "choosing to love someone of the same sex?" I actually think this Bruno deal should be considered a sexual crime.

BTW. This is the second time I have read some disgusting article on Nolan Chart in regard to Ron Paul.

party presidential candidate Bob Barr was the author of the defense of marriage act. it is mere semantics to attack ron paul over a film. i am bi, and totally not offended. get over it.

Blame Jesse Benton for having him in this situation in the first place.

I've thought about making a Fire Jesse Burton Facebook group, but I'm seriously more ticked off about this incident the more I hear of it

-------------------------------------------------------
Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Not War, Welfare and Bankruptcy.

------------

So what if he was flustered and left the interview quickly? I sure as shit wouldn't hang around if some guy was doing that.

When it comes to RP's stance on Gay Rights, he has consistently said that the only kind of rights he believes in are individual rights.

Gay marriage? No problem get the government out of the business of giving marriage licences.

Don't ask don't tell? All I've ever heard him say on the subject is that all soldiers should be treated equally-- if their behavior is disruptive give them the boot regardless of sexual orientation.

Etc, Etc...

My favorite part of the article was the bit about the "The Pledge of Allegiance." What sort of fuckwad libertarian upholds the Pledge of Alleigance (to the government) as something good?

This article is long on "rights" and short on responsibility; which is basically our whole problem as a country. Everybody wants their rights but they won't accept responsibility for themselves. Pathetic, this lady sounds less liberty minded and more collectivist to me.

being gay, marriage rights,gays in the military, or any of that stuff have to do with anyone of any sex or sexual orientation have to do with anyone of any sex or sexual orientation pulling down thier pants and putting the moves on you in that situation? And if you want to get technical, when i was a kid and RP is old enough to be my father. Queer meant wierd or strange. Not gay. So calling him queer was not at all out of line. Under either meaning. Some stranger pulls his pants down around me I'd high tail it out of there and have some choice words too.