0 votes

"WeAreChangeLA" insinuates Ron Paul in Las Vegas

With a recent publication of a WeAreChange ambush video (the LA chapter of 9/11 activists), a guerrilla journalist implies Republican House Member Rep. Ron Paul has knowledge of a government conspiracy to intentionally kill almost 3,000 of it's own citizens.

In a dark and seedy video, after a false flag question and with matter-of-fact words, the golden haired beauty [Kyley from WAC] asks the former presidential candidate
"Why don't you come out about the truth on 9/11?".

Watch the accusation here:

Implying the implausible that the 73 year old doctor holds information of a grand scale cover up but refuses to release his inside information is tantamount to treasonous.

Does WeAreChange want to hang this grandfather of 15 ?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

divide and conquer

divide and conquer


I've noticed lately this site has been infiltrated with these trolls.On and on we go.
Don't you have something better to do?

There's another idiot posting articles from David Duke;WTF is going on here?

I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees...

I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees...

Your title is grammatically incorrect

and doesn't make any sense.

Although Rick Perry may be a paid advertiser on the Daily Paul, both he and Kay Bailey Hutchinson are neo-cons. Instead, vote Debra Medina in the Republican primary for Governor of Texas.

"the only thing that keeps the banking system from failing is general ignorance about how the banking system works."

Are you sure you want to keep on with this?

How many times are you going to change your title anyway? Did '"WeAreChangeLA" Accuses Ron Paul of Treason' not work out so well for you?

You changed to a more benign title, but now we have '"WeAreChangeLA" insinuates Ron Paul in Las Vegas'

IveSeenTheConst, if you insist on trying to make something out of the question posed to Ron Paul, be aware that you are also going to have to deal with the flip side:

HIS ANSWER...and what it "insinuates".


If everyone pursued the truth with their tenacity we'd be living in a much better country.

She did put him on the spot, and RP intimated that he's got a full plate going after another group of criminals (possibly the same). I agree with his answer. I think Dr. Paul should be putting the pressure on the Fed and the focus on monetary policy, and that WAC should continue kicking ass.


They did not directly accuse him of treason. They asked him the question "Why don't you come out about the truth on 9/11?"

I don't believe in this 9/11 truth stuff, but the idea that asking that question means they are calling the congressman a traitor is not true.

You're the one who said that not them.

You know they didn't even state what they meant by the "truth" so what that means leaves the question even more open ended for the person who is fielding the question. Obviously it has an insinuation, but I don't get how you make these wild jumps.

"Obviously it has an insinuation"

ok then. better now ?

That is just idiotic . Now it becomes clear , You turn an

innocent question into some type of accusation ? Now if it was Barney Frank or any of the lot who run and hide at the question that is different .

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !

I didn't get that impression

I think you are reading too much into it maybe. It seems to me that WAC LA was happy with his answer because he told the truth--that it would be political suicide. That's way more than any other politician then I can think of has admitted.

We've all seen

and talked about this video already.
Nobody else who saw it, took it that way.

"I'veSeenTheConst", is just trying to put his/her trollish spin on it.
A very weak attempt to advance his/her agenda.
It's the typical "make something up and try to deceive some people with it" ploy.

If none of the rest of you remember, "I'veSeenTheConst" was a regular troll here about 6-12 months ago.

He is pathetic.

His little " Let's all go support the bruno movie" thread was painfully obvious, as have been his many attempts at grabbing attention and starting controversy over the last couple of years..
He is a swirlmark on the toilet bowl of Liberty.
I'm sure he'll get a free pass to do as he pleases.
Sorry to bump this, but I had to agree with you Big T.

who cares.

It's a goofy group, but why does asking the question "Why don't you come out about the truth on 9/11?" have anything to do with treason? This thread is dumb. She asked in a reasonable way to she wasn't screaming.

This treason stuff is something the most neoconservative republicans would say in their responses to everything. Everyone who doesn't think what I think is a traitor to the central government!