This news is from a fan who noticed that web traffic to the Ron Paul site tripled after the debate, while visits to other GOP candidate sites dropped precipitously.
Although the Paul site has only been operational since March, the recent volume closely approaches the highest visit counts to the Giuliani and McCain websites and is currently five times higher than the major candidates.
ABC news has finally admitted to Ron's showing of support in the debate with this article here:
If you read the ensuing commentary, you will see that savvy Paul supporters do not buy the idea that one guy with a computer voted 80,000 times!
Let's hope FOX NEWS understands that they will not get away with any hanky panky on May 15th...
John McLaughlin is one of the most respected commentators on TV today. In his opinion, which you will hear at the end of this video, Ron gave the best performance in the debate.
Is it any wonder? It's easy to give a good performance when you are honest, sincere, convicted and correct!
So, let's review our successes:
I am very upset at the moment. There is currently a concerted effort to censor Dr. Paul's supporter's comments on ABC news going on. Please act NOW!
Call 212-456-2700 and ask to be connected with "dot com". Talk to the gentleman there about it. Voice your concerns over the fact that Dr. Paul was missing from their recent online poll and most importantly that they are removing comments from their online comment section.
(New - thanks rdw)
I am still so excited over how well Dr. Paul did Thursday evening in the California debates. I think this is just the beginning of good things to come. My husband and I were actually out of town Thursday and Friday, but when we got in late Friday evening, a friend had forwarded me the following link and urged me to go vote, which I did.
I found out the convention will be in St. Paul MN next year.
I'm not interested in his canonization, but in his nomination.
Yet I think it makes for a good slogan or bumper-sticker.
Ron Paul in Saint Paul!
I'm watching MSNBC this morning, and of the 2nd tier candidates the only one being regularly mentioned is Ron Paul. The Polls on the internet, the principled positions, etc.
In the debate itself, he wasn't polished, but that was better. He was spontaneous and made sense. Unlike a doll that regurgitates a talking point when you pull a string (and puppets have strings).
I think he accomplished what he needed to at this point.
Thank you for clarifying my mistake. I am glad to see that FoxNews has made the right decision.
I am looking forward to the debate tonight !
Just in case anyone from NH is reading this blog but is out of the loop of our vast network of Ron Paul supporters' websites, here goes!
They haven't said so specifically, but I saw a note (without any link) on the antiwar.com blog, so I searched and this article comes up. Only three candidates meet the criteria, but are they going to make exceptions?
It looks like they just want a beauty contest. If anyone knows the best contact for Fox News and/or the SC party to stop this outrage, please post a comment. For now we might contact Fox News and the SC Republican party.
A student named James Kotecki made good use of his computer and living space for history-in-the-making.
Dr. Paul shares his background and responds to current issues.
The following links will download the digital videos:
This is awesome. Good work to the supporters in New Hampshire who got out there with Ron Paul signs. Talk about forcing the media to recognize you !!!!!!
Dobbs even advertised the upcoming interview on his show. The time is from Ron Paul's site, but I would tune in earlier just in case.