I was just reading an article from TIME. Scrolling through the comments, I couldn't help but notice how everyone was attacking Dr. Paul for wanting to end these "social safety nets." Admittedly, I have not studied politics and economics as much as I probably could have, I was pretty tied up the last eight years fighting more than one "war on terror".
Can anyone explain how it got this far? I figured there was no point in fighting the liberals in a comment section, so I thought I would pose the question here.