I often encounter articles seeking to support America’s worldwide military interventionism by asking non-interventionists like Dr. Paul “What would you have done about Hitler?!”
I suggest the best response is to point out that if Dr. Paul had been President instead of Woodrow Wilson, there would never
have BEEN a Hitler. I invite you to evaluate my argument, and would love to receive your comments. I'm hoping this can become a widespread and effective counter to those who would use the Hitler question as a rhetorical cudgel against Dr. Paul.
Here is an excerpt from an article I wrote on the idea of 'blaming America' for 9/11. I come to the conclusion that Ron Paul blames the government, while neocons are actually blaming Americans:
There are the two positions that seem to exist within the Republican. Boiled down, one side believes that the terrorists hate 'us' for 'our' freedoms. The other believes they hate 'us' because of 'our' military interventions.
So I ask, "Which side is actually blaming America?"
This September 11 is the anniversary of one of the most momentous occasions in US History:
Indeed, it is the 70th anniversary of this courageous stand taken by an exemplar of American heroism!