I often encounter articles seeking to support America’s worldwide military interventionism by asking non-interventionists like Dr. Paul “What would you have done about Hitler?!”
I suggest the best response is to point out that if Dr. Paul had been President instead of Woodrow Wilson, there would never
have BEEN a Hitler. I invite you to evaluate my argument, and would love to receive your comments. I'm hoping this can become a widespread and effective counter to those who would use the Hitler question as a rhetorical cudgel against Dr. Paul.
Message to Ron Paul Campaign: How to win the Warmonger Neocons, especially after the CNN/Teaparty Debate!Submitted by JTTC on Tue, 09/13/2011 - 02:05
Ok if you want to win their votes WHILE maintaining your integrity (which is a given, naturally) you need to STOP saying 9/11 was a result of US foreign policy or that we invited 9/11 upon us. I know we did, trust me, but hang in for a second.
INSTEAD, you need to ride the anti-Washington wave and start emphasizing it is the result of Washington D.C. using our military unconstitutionally which aided to out of control spending. As you once said, "We get out marching orders from the constitution." And what's more, we have to borrow from China to do it! This will make them think twice.
Rick Santorum tries to say Dr. Paul "blames America" for 9/11. This is nothing but desperate, pathetic demagoguery. Personally, I hold neocon trash like Rick Santorum culpable for 9/11, as he & his ilk are those who supported policies of interventionism, preemptive war, & decided America was the "policeman" of the world. These arrogant, ethnocentric, uneducated saboteurs of the Constitution are those who are truly to blame for the blowback which exposed itself on 9/11. And I would say this straight to his face.