Comment: That must be why they discuss 'carbon tax'...

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: They are talking about (see in situ)

That must be why they discuss 'carbon tax'...

I'm just bringing it up for discussion, so welcome.

You seem to have bought into this global warming... oh, I'm sorry.... it's global climate change now, right?

That's because they forgot that many of us who lived through the 70's were already exposed to this BS still remember! Remember "The Coming Ice Age"? Remember the scare tactics they deployed back then? They hope you don't so I try to remind people.

If a tactic works, you are certain to see it again. They passed the 'ecology based' bill back then. They know the scare tactics work. They barely put a new face on it and trotted out the same crap four decades later. Now instead of the next ice age, they pushed the 'global warming' scam.

Everyone my aged guffawed when we first heard it. Couldn't believe they would try the same thing again. But there are a lot more people who don't remember.

So your hair-splitting, word-mincing tactics don't move me. A BS story is a BS story no matter when it was dated.

So, I'll stick by my statement. However you slice is, this sort of thinking will not benefit the people. It was never meant to. It was meant to make the life you've come to know unmaintainable. The elite will simply pay their 'carbon tax' and continue as they have been. Al Gore won't give up his jet or his 20K square foot home... but you won't be able to put gas in your car or keep your heat on.

That's what it's all about.

Remember, when they talk of reducing 'carbon footprints'... you've got two.

I may not know the truth, but I know when I'm being lied to...

I may not know the truth, but I know when I'm being lied to...