 |  |
Dedicated to restoring Constitutional government to the United States of America
Most Viewed
by signed in DPers this minute
13 "Red Dawn" or Hoax? Reports of Transport Planes Carrying Foreign Troops across the U.S.6 San Diego Mayor urges jury nullification5 Welcome to the USA-SSR. Adam Kokesh being illegally detained in federal prison under fake charges.5 Pulled over today with no license, license plate, or registration5 Superstition - What the Bible says:
more
User login
Top Recent Topics
Active Forum Topics
 |
 |
 |
Recent Comments
# National Security Letters:
by uastudy
25 sec ago
25 sec ago
# Congress borrows more that they can't pay back.
by Paul_S.
2 min 52 sec ago
2 min 52 sec ago
# So if God clearly says not to
by MaxK
1 min 1 sec ago
1 min 1 sec ago
# You see, the thing is, some
by gomez
8 min 26 sec ago
8 min 26 sec ago
# Todd makes a report on his
by Paul_S.
9 min 17 sec ago
9 min 17 sec ago
# What does it mean?
by dailypauler
10 min 1 sec ago
10 min 1 sec ago
# Foreign troops train in the
by thelastbill
10 min 57 sec ago
10 min 57 sec ago
# I see you've got another one coming up
by boneless chicke...
24 sec ago
24 sec ago
# https://comparesilverprices.c
by John C
16 min 49 sec ago
16 min 49 sec ago
# Wouldn't work
by troy
17 min 13 sec ago
17 min 13 sec ago
# Step two: verify information UPDATE
by Steadfast
4 min 37 sec ago
4 min 37 sec ago
# Brilliant speech! I love the part about the macaws and the
by Gilligan
17 min 51 sec ago
17 min 51 sec ago
# Listening to the hearing now.
by Liberty_Mike
18 min 27 sec ago
18 min 27 sec ago
# hmmm...a San Diego politician
by boneless chicke...
20 min 50 sec ago
20 min 50 sec ago
# step one
by boneless chicke...
23 min 13 sec ago
23 min 13 sec ago
# http://www.golddealer.com/bul
by TJV123
24 min 15 sec ago
24 min 15 sec ago
# Here we can get a hint on what will happen in the future
by beeman
24 min 29 sec ago
24 min 29 sec ago
# The DHS has no reason to be
by Charles Wilson
24 min 40 sec ago
24 min 40 sec ago
Who's Online
134 users currently online.
1,029 users signed in today.
47,740 guest views today.
- RpLiberty75
- TxRedneck
- LissaN
- sawx75
- Conservative Warrior
- Scott Gray
- PatriotsUnderGod
- rex84
- dailypauler
- ProudAmericanFirst
- Harmonist
- rblauvelt
- Benjamin Vander Jagt
- Freedom Ninja
- Habit4ming
- Ubuntu
- njcarlos
- uastudy
- boneless chicken rancher
- detached
- babybear
- Tom Rankin
- Johny-Boy
- TJV123
- MaxK
- troy
- President Paul or Bust
- Chef4Paul
- Steadfast
- SarahLovinLivinIdaho
- Robert Ramos
- emalvini
- joetorio
- summjet
- Paul_S.
- sgray
- Calgary4Paul
- Smudge Pot
- xbanks2
- Joη
- Ira Freeman
- JDarty
- jp202120
- BMWJIM
- fiodax
- carpavel
- bierdegarde
- tasmlab
- richybear
- Camaro
Comment: Well
Well
His position IS potentially more constitutional, that is if we have misconstrued what Rand meant. Which apparently is the case and the reason for the debate. what did he actually mean? You're most likely be right rhino, they are probably both equally constitutional and lead to the same conclusion, only semantics and nuances got in the way. I don't care for your last statement though.
Their differing approaches will not determine who will get elected but rather who they will be beholden to when they do.
Replies to this comment: